Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Catalog

Home : Publications : Catalog : Online Publications : Document

Table of Contents
p. 12 of 54 BACK | NEXT
I. Developing Asia and the World - Economic Developments and Prospects
II. Economic Trends and Prospects in Developing Asia
Newly Industrialized Economies
>> Central Asian Republics, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyz Republic
Tajikistan and Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Mongolia
People’s Republic of China
Southeast Asia
South Asia
The Pacific
III. Asia's Globalization Challenge
Asian Development Outlook 2001 : II. Economic Trends and Prospects in Developing Asia

Central Asian Republics, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia

The group of countries comprising the Central Asian republics, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia all face challenging geographic and economic circumstances, including the relatively small size of their economies; remoteness from world markets; long-term isolation from global technology and capital flows; heavy dependence on primary production of energy, minerals, and other commodities; continuing vulnerability to external shocks arising from volatility in international oil and commodity prices; dependence on the Russian economy (which is still the single largest market for their exports); and an industrial structure from the Soviet era that is hardly compatible with an open economy. These formidable economic challenges are further exacerbated by problems of systemic transition and the severance of Soviet fiscal subsidies that have resulted in a sharp decline in human development indicators and emergence of widespread poverty. Recently, the appearance in some of these countries of social, religious, and ethnic strife, which perhaps lay dormant under the strictures of the earlier centrally controlled regime, has added to the uncertainty, affecting the investment climate and growth prospects of these economies.

Faced with such adverse circumstances, the various governments have implemented a large-scale and wide-ranging program of structural reforms, though with significant variations across countries. On the basis of these reforms and with external circumstances finally turning favorable in 1999, most of these economies—with the exception of Mongolia—are now recovering from the economic downturn that lasted, for most of them, from the breakup of the former Soviet Union until the mid-1990s when the decline in GDP was arrested and positive growth was achieved. This recovery was nearly derailed as a result of the Russian crisis of August 1998 that followed in the wake of the Asian financial crisis.

The improvement in the Russian economy since 1999 and the rise in international energy prices have helped generate strong aggregate GDP growth of nearly 5 percent in 1999 for these countries as a whole; this growth improved further to almost 8 percent in 2000. The growth performance would have been better if the agriculture sector had not suffered a severe drought that affected the cotton crop, a major export item, and food grain production in some countries.

More creditably, the improved growth performance has been achieved along with overall macroeconomic stability. The aggregate level of inflation in these seven countries remained high at around 15 percent in 2000. This reflected the positive effects of exchange rate stability and tighter monetary policies. Higher revenues from the oil sector and efforts at improving public expenditure management and tax administration have seen the countries’ fiscal balances improve. Taking advantage of high international oil and gas prices and greater access to pipelines and other supply outlets, the export earnings of the group increased from virtually zero to about 25 percent in 2000 (excluding Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan). This enabled some of these countries to improve their external account balances as reflected in the buildup of international reserves and the significant improvement in external debt-service ability. The Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan, though, face an unsustainable external debt-service burden in the short term. This has prompted a multilateral review of their external debt liability and bilateral negotiations for rescheduling their debt-service flows.

Although the positive aggregate economic performance hides wide variations across countries, the economic outlook for this group is upbeat. Economic growth will remain positive, though lower than in 2000 as oil prices are expected to soften and demand from the Russian Federation and other countries in the Commonwealth of Independent States slackens as a result of a slowing of these economies. Agricultural performance is expected to remain weak if the adverse weather forecasts for the next two years are proved right. Even with strong and sustained GDP growth as achieved in the last two years, per capita income levels in these countries are not expected to return to the levels of the late 1980s for the next few years. Determined policy efforts will be needed to ensure that market-based economic growth does not cause equity disparities to rise further and that growth is inclusive.

For generating sustained growth in per capita incomes and for reducing poverty levels, the countries, to greater or lesser degrees, need to vigorously pursue their structural reform programs. The focus has to be on generating pro-poor growth while maintaining macroeconomic stability. This will require liberalizing the economies further, in keeping with individual country conditions; removing any significant price distortions and controls on the current account; privatizing state enterprises and setting up a regulatory mechanism to ensure fair competition and consumer protection; establishing the institutional framework for private sector-led growth; ensuring that the poorer segments of society participate in the growth process; and putting in place a social safety net that will protect the poor and vulnerable from the adverse impact of cyclical economic downturns.

Box 2.1 Azerbaijan

Economic performance was strong in 2000, with real GDP growth estimated to have accelerated to 11.0 percent from 7.4 percent in 1999. The major contributing factor was the 20-plus percent upsurge in the oil and oil-related sectors in the first half of 2000, which benefited from rising world oil prices. The agriculture sector, however, grew more slowly in 2000, by about 6 percent. Growth in other labor-intensive sectors is estimated to have remained weak. Consequently, the level of unemployment (hidden and open) is estimated at 18 percent in 2000, similar to the 1999 level.

The current account deficit improved significantly in 2000 to 0.9 percent of GDP ($43 million) from 15.0 percent ($600 million) in 1999 primarily because of a stronger trade balance, on which a surplus of $400 million (8.0 percent of GDP) was posted in 2000 compared with a deficit of $408 million a year earlier. Among the contributing factors were growing oil exports and a smaller increase of imports due to the slowdown in oil equipment imports. Gross foreign exchange reserves increased slightly from $676 million in 1999 to $680 million in 2000, equivalent to about six months of imports. Total external debt rose to $1.2 billion, from $962 million over the same period.

The Government adopted a tight fiscal stance in 2000. The total fiscal deficit is estimated to have been reduced to 2.3 percent of GDP in 2000 from 5.4 percent in 1999. Improved budget revenues and a lower level of public expenditures were the main reasons for this. On the monetary side, an eased policy stance that began in mid-1999 continued. Inflation (measured by the consumer price index) is estimated at 2.2 percent in 2000 compared with deflation of 8.5 percent in 1999. Without jeopardizing currency stability, the Government has continued its flexible exchange rate management approach. The local currency, the manat, depreciated gradually by 7.8 percent to an average level of 4,474 manat in 2000 from 4,126 manat in 1999.

To better manage the expected increase in oil revenues, the Government is aiming soon to put into operation the State Oil Fund, which was established in November 1999. In addition, progress has been made in implementing policy reforms, such as the passage of a civil code (effective 1 September 2000) and an amended tax code (effective 1 January 2001). However, structural reforms, particularly in the banking sector, have lagged behind. Crucial reforms are needed in this sector to improve supervision and strengthen enforcement of prudential regulations in line with international best practice.

The economic outlook for 2001 appears to be promising in view of positive prospects in the oil-related industries and indications of improved performance in agriculture in the second half of 2000. However, real GDP growth in 2001 may be lower than in 2000, due to a softening in world oil prices and a slowdown in foreign investment. In the short term, the Government is expected to maintain its current tight fiscal and slightly loose monetary policy mix. The fiscal deficit has been budgeted at 2.0 percent of GDP for 2001. Improved value-added tax collection and the adoption of the amended tax code will help in this. However, it remains a challenge for the Government to lift much-needed social expenditures, while keeping the fiscal deficit under control. After significant deflation during 1998–1999 and a moderate rate of inflation of 2.2 percent in 2000, inflation in 2001 will likely continue to rise. In view of slowing foreign capital inflows, the manat will be subject to greater pressure to depreciate further.

To maintain investor confidence, the Government needs to make a serious effort in implementing structural reforms. Important areas include privatization, financial sector restructuring, and good governance to establish institutions and the rule of law conducive to a market-based economy. The increasing dependence on oil exports is a concern, and the development of non-oil sectors will be crucial to achieving a balanced external account position and sustainable growth. Understanding this, the Government made the issue of non-oil sector development a priority in its recent development strategy.


The seven economies continue to be characterized by a weak banking and financial sector. This prevents the effective mobilization of investment resources. The small and medium-sized enterprise sector—often the most dynamic sector for creating new competitive industrial capacities and trading ventures —especially suffers from a relative lack of access to financial resources. Particular attention is needed for the development of the financial sector to facilitate the emergence of small and medium-sized enterprises and to help in channeling resources to the rural sector, both of which contribute to pro-poor growth. Human resources development now requires a combination of public and private sector initiatives and resources for meeting the needs of a market economy.

In each of these countries, the government may need to actively intervene to try and diversify the economy so as to reduce its vulnerability from volatility in international energy and commodity prices and to generate employment. Given the geographic isolation of these economies and their relatively small size, any strategy for sustained growth, rapid industrialization, and economic diversification will be facilitated with the emergence of a subregional market. This requires an active program of economic cooperation that will promote the free flow of goods and services and permit the establishment of viable and internationally competitive production capacities. The infrastructure, which was developed in the past to connect these economies individually to the Russian markets, also needs to be revamped so as to permit more efficient resource allocation.

Recognizing these imperatives, and because of the collapse of the Soviet trade system, the various governments have actively searched for viable cooperation ventures among themselves. The establishment of the Interstate Council of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, and Uzbekistan (later joined by Tajikistan) is a notable example. In addition, most of the governments have conducted negotiations on the trade in energy, and have taken steps toward cooperating on resolving the environmental problems of the Aral Sea area. These activities reveal an underlying commitment to economic cooperation, and an understanding and appreciation by the governments that solutions to their common problems must be found.



<<Back
Taipei,China
Next>>
Kazakhstan

© 2009 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page