Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Catalog

Home : Publications : Catalog : Online Publications : Document

Table of Contents
p. 51 of 69 BACK | NEXT
Foreword, Acknowledgments, Acronyms and Abbreviations, Definitions
I. Developing Asia and the World
II. Economic Trends and Prospects in Developing Asia
East Asia
Southeast Asia
South Asia
Central Asia
The Pacific
Cook Islands
Fiji Islands
Kiribati
>>Republic of the Marshall Islands
Federated States of Micronesia
Nauru
Papua New Guinea
Samoa
Solomon Islands
Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste
Tonga
Tuvalu
Vanuatu
III. Foreign Direct Investments in Developing Asia
Asian Development Outlook 2004 : II. Economic Trends and Prospects in Developing Asia

Republic of the Marshall Islands

As a result of limited expansion in the public sector and in primary production, the economy grew slowly in 2003. The late-2003 approval of the amended Compact of Free Association, which reaffirms the importance of private sector development, laid a foundation for achieving long-term fiscal sustainability, though this will require an adjustment to lower levels of public spending.

Economic Assessment

After strengthening by an estimated 4.0% in FY2002 (ended 30 September 2002), GDP is likely to have risen by close to 3.0% in FY2003, following recently revised public expenditure figures and analysis of the main local firms' annual reports. Statistical weakness, however, makes it difficult to assess economic performance.

Copra production expanded on account of higher copra prices, continued government subsidies, and intensified frequency of outer island shipping services. Also, the tuna loining plant turned in higher production figures than in 2002. Government spending expanded, though at a much slower rate than in FY2002, which was the first year of a 2-year boost in Compact funding pending finalization of the amended Compact of Free Association between the US and the Marshall Islands. The upturn in government demand, albeit modest, provided some stimulus to activity in other services sectors, particularly transport and communications. In the retail trade sector, increased competition led to faster growth.

Employment edged up in FY2003, primarily due to the filling of some civil serviceFigure 2.29 vacancies, and government wages rose from the previous year's level (Figure 2.29). However, growth in labor demand fell short of the annual increase in the labor supply (averaging about 2.4%).

The FY2003 budget forecast an overall surplus equivalent to 14.1% of GDP, compared with an actual surplus of 14.8% in FY2002. Tax revenues were expected to rise by 3.1% from the FY2002 level, largely because of a rise in gross revenues and import taxes. External grants, mostly supplied under Compact provisions, were forecast to remain unchanged, accounting for 50.4% of total revenues (exclusive of loan funds). Total expenditures in FY2003 were forecast to rise by 3.8% from the FY2002 level. The FY2003 budget provided for a 5% limit to the growth of general fund expenditures and continued the public service wage freeze (with the exception of some increases in the Ministry of Education that brought teachers' salaries in line with Public Service Commission pay scales). The actual budget outcomes for general fund activities in FY2003 showed that expenditures were well controlled, coming in just under the budget estimate, and that revenues were slightly above the budget estimate, mainly the result of improved tax collection.

The surplus was allocated as a contribution to the Marshall Islands Intergenerational Trust Fund (MIITF), which at end-FY2003 had a total capital of $31 million that was to be the seed money for the Compact Trust Fund to be established in FY2004. However, prior to the general elections of November 2003, $7 million of this allocation to the MIITF was provided as a deposit to the Marshall Islands Development Bank (MIDB) for onlending at concessional rates to two major retailers, and effectively became unavailable for augmenting Compact Trust Fund capital. External public debt in FY2003 was just over 50% of GDP and was dominated by ADB concessional loans. Debt service was at a manageable level following the 2001 repayment of high-cost commercial debt.

Inflation tends to track that in the US, which supplies 50-60% of imports. The estimated inflation rate in FY2003 was 2.5%, up from 2.0% in FY2002. Commercial banking services are provided by the Bank of Guam and the Bank of the Marshall Islands. Due to persistent defaults on consumer loan repayments, these banks slightly raised their lending rates on consumer loans to 18.5% in FY2003. In contrast, MIDB offered consumer loans at about 14%. The interest rate spread remained in the 7-12% range-with commercial loans at the lower end of the scale, and consumer loans at the upper.

The reexport of diesel fuel associated with the fishing transshipment base in Majuro remained the largest export in FY2003, while domestically generated exports were limited mainly to copra cake and coconut oil. After declining in FY2002, it is estimated that merchandise exports picked up by 12.3% in FY2003, but imports, at about five times the value of exports, rose moderately, and as a result the trade deficit remained substantial. Net income receipts and external transfers ensured another substantial current account surplus. The country's location, small size, and high cost structure continued to be the main obstacles to FDI, despite the possibility of receiving considerable tax and regulatory exemptions of the sort granted to the tuna loining operation.

Policy Developments

The critical policy development in 2003 was the passage into US law in late November of the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act 2003, which sets out the nature and terms of US financial assistance for the period FY2004-FY2023 (Box 2.5). The overall annual financial support potentially receivable in this period, prior to inflation and other adjustments, is in the order of $66 million, or about 60% of the current nominal GDP level. Under the amended Compact, there will be a shift from general budgetary grants to sector grants, characterized by enhanced measures for accountability.

The FY2004 budget was the second formulated within a medium-term and investment framework context, and the phased introduction of performance-based budgeting. It estimates that total revenues and grants will rise by 5.2% from the level estimated in the FY2003 budget. The amended Compact contribution is $57.7 million, including a $7 million US contribution to the Compact Trust Fund. External grants will fund 51.4% of the budget, with tax revenues projected to rise by 3.0% in FY2004. Total expenditures are estimated to rise by 16.4% from the FY2003 figure, so that the budget surplus falls to $7.0 million from $16.0 million in FY2003. The education, health, and environment sectors are to receive substantial increments in their budget allocations.

The Government was returned to office in the November 2003 election and remained committed to the implementation of structural reforms, including the creation of a leaner, results-oriented civil service, tax and tariff reform, SOE reform, and enhancement of the environment for private sector activities. In 2003, a review of management systems and pay scales in the civil service was under way and several initiatives to facilitate private sector development were introduced. These included the amendment of the Development Land Registry Act, increased provision of business development services, streamlining of company registration processes, and the start of a process of strengthening land management and administration. However, transaction costs for foreign investment licensing remained high and no discernible progress was made in reforming the regressive taxation system. The financial performance of most SOEs remained poor in 2003, and the Government had still to follow through on its stated intention to divest itself of unprofitable businesses.

Outlook for 2004-2005

It is highly unlikely that there will be a significant medium-term expansion in the private sector, independently of public sector developments. It is accepted that the key to generating such an expansion is foreign investment in export-oriented ventures, but pilot projects in outer island tourism as well as farming seaweed, black pearls, and fish have not resulted in commercially viable outcomes, and there has been no notable foreign investment since the 1997 establishment of the tuna loining plant. Consequently, the public sector will continue driving the economy over the medium term.

The FY2004 budget provides for a boost to public expenditures, particularly in the health and education sectors, in line with the amended Compact. This is expected to create a demand-side stimulus to the economy, which is forecast to grow by 2-3% in FY2004. Major capital projects will probably only start in late 2004, and this will provide a stimulus in the years to come. In addition, there will be a one-off increase in Compact sector grant assistance in FY2005 of $5.6 million, prior to the phased $0.5 million annual reduction planned for subsequent years. Growth in FY2005 is expected to be around 3%. Cyclones and drought, which have had major impacts on subsistence agriculture and fishing in the past, as well as on physical infrastructure, could cause output volatility in the medium term. Inflation is forecast to remain in the 2-3% range in FY2004 and FY2005, in line with trends in the US economy.

The balance-of-payments profile is forecast to remain fundamentally unchanged in the medium to long term. The performance on the trade account will depend crucially on diesel reexports, which in turn will be a function of the transshipment business and thus the tuna catch and price. Copra production may be stimulated by a possible liberalization of the buying arrangements, but the copra processing plant is heavily subsidized and makes a negative contribution to GDP. The large trade deficit is expected to continue to be more than covered by net income from remittances and official transfers.

Over the long term, the Government faces the major fiscal challenge of managing the adjustment to a decline in Compact funds and placing government revenues on a sustainable basis. A promising start was made with the initial allocation of the bulk of "bump up" Compact funding in FY2002 and FY2003 to the MIITF, but the diversion of $7 million to MIDB in late 2003 is a fiscal governance concern, and sizable budget surpluses will need to be run into the future, in order to build up the Fund to the required level. The medium-term budget and investment framework for FY2004 and FY2005 projects surpluses in the $7 million-10 million range, which at under 6% of GDP may prove to be insufficient to build up the Fund. A comprehensive reform of taxation and tax collection is needed but faces strong opposition from groups with vested interests in maintaining the current tax arrangements. In addition, budget pressures could arise in the long term if sea-level rise causes accelerated coastal erosion, greater risk of storm surges, and excessive saltwater intrusion into fragile freshwater resources.

The Government is committed to poverty reduction and is planning to implement projects aimed at improving transport and basic social services to the outer islands, where hardship is somewhat higher. However, the prospects are that the numbers of unemployed and disadvantaged in Majuro and Ebeye, where two thirds of the population live, will rise. The rate of increase in the labor force is expected to outpace the rate of job creation by a wide margin, making emigration an even more important means of relieving population pressures and placing private sector development as a main item on the government agenda for future economic growth.

Box 2.5 The Amended Compacts of Free Association of the United States with the Federated States of Micronesia and the Republic of the Marshall Islands

On 20 November 2003 the US Congress passed the Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003. The legislation revises the two Compacts of Free Association signed in 1986 with the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI). The 2003 Compact sets forth the terms of financial assistance, estimated at more than $3.5 billion, from the US to the two countries for a 20-year period starting from fiscal year (FY) 2004, i.e., from October 2003.

Over the 17 years (FY1987-FY2003) from the start of the two original Compacts, the US provided a total of approximately $2.1 billion ($1,350 million to the FSM and $750 million to the RMI).

The main objective of the amended Compact is to enable the two countries to achieve economic self-reliance by the end of FY2023. Although there are provisions specific to each of the two countries (see the relevant country chapters), it includes several features common to both (as follows).

Coordination through Joint Committees. Compact funds are to be managed and monitored through a mechanism of joint committees. These are, respectively, the Joint Economic Management Committee (JEMCO) in the FSM and the Joint Economic Management and Financial Accountability Committee (JEMFAC) in the RMI. Among other things, the joint committee in each country will review planning and budget documents of the government, monitor the progress of the country toward sustainable economic development and budgetary self-reliance, review and approve annual grant allocations and performance objectives, and review quarterly trust fund investment reports.

Grants for Key Sectors. Grant assistance under the amended Compact is targeted for specific purposes, with priority accorded to six key sectors. Annual sector grant assistance gradually declines over the 20-year term. The grant reduction amount is matched by a corresponding increase in annual contributions to trust funds established for the two countries. Priority sectors are education, health, environment, private sector development, public sector capacity building, and public sector infrastructure development and maintenance. The allocation of funds among these sectors will be decided through a medium-term planning process to be prepared by the FSM and the RMI governments. Priority funding sectors are education, health, and infrastructure. Public sector infrastructure development and maintenance are identified as one of the grant sectors in the FSM agreement, while in the case of the RMI, not less than 30% and not more than 50% of total grant assistance must be channeled to infrastructure development and maintenance. In addition, in both countries, 5% of the grant amount allocated to infrastructure, combined with a matching amount from the respective government, is placed in an Infrastructure Maintenance Fund.

Establishment of a Trust Fund. Central to the amended Compact is the establishment of a trust fund, in each country. These trust funds are meant to ensure sustainable sources of revenue and foster economic self-reliance, in anticipation of the fact that the financial support under the amended Compact is scheduled to end in September 2023. The amended Compact provides for US government control over the administration of the two trust funds until FY2023. Each country is required to provide $30 million to set up its respective trust fund. Initial contributions by both countries will be augmented annually by the gradually increasing contributions from the US. All earnings from the trust funds will remain untouched until 2023 and will be reinvested. At an assumed annual rate of return of 6%, each trust fund is expected to generate earnings from 2023 onward that would be enough to replace the annual US contributions to their budgets.

Continuing Access to Selected US Federal Programs. The amended Compact ensures continued access to several US federal programs for FSM and RMI citizens, while an agreement was reached to "cash out" other previously available programs. In particular, supplemental education funds were provided in lieu of continued eligibility for certain education grants. For programs that will be terminated, the cash equivalent of the assistance previously provided has been reflected in the financial package. Continued access to essential programs from the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency was agreed until FY2008, while negotiations for new disaster assistance arrangements are expected to start soon.

Accountability and Reporting Mechanisms. New procedures have been introduced to enhance financial accountability and economic management, such as targeted priority areas for grant assistance, expanded reporting requirements, coordination, and overall supervision by the respective JEMCO, and the possibility for the US Government to withhold funds in case of noncompliance with grant terms and conditions. The governments of the FSM and the RMI are required to submit annual budgets with sector expenditures and performance measures, annual reports on the use of assistance, quarterly and annual financial reports, and quarterly grant performance reports. Annual audit grants (in the amount of "up to the lesser" of $500,000 or one half the annual audit cost) are also provided to both countries in order to conduct effective financial control and monitoring.

The amended Compact also deals with defense arrangements, immigration provisions, and special provisions for judicial training.

Sources: United States Congress; Compact Negotiations Office, Republic of the Marshall Islands; Joint Committee for Compact Economic Negotiations, Federated States of Micronesia.



<<Back
Kiribati
Next>>
Federated States of Micronesia

© 2009 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page