 |
Table of Contents |
 |
|
|
Central Asian Regional Economic Cooperation :
III. The ADB Initiative Towards Economic Cooperation in Central Asia
B. Phase II: 1999-2002
21. Phase II of this regional initiative commenced in 1999 and seeks to support, in
the context of regional cooperation, the continuing policy dialogue to remove cross-border
barriers and facilitate the efficient movement of goods and peoples. Phase II
maintained the initial strategic thrust noted above and has been guided by the following
tactical concerns:
The ADB’s initiative should stay tightly focused, emphasizing areas of
comparative advantage such as transport.6 Reflecting the ADB’s comparative
advantages, the work in the transport sector should be broad-based, the work in
energy much more tightly oriented, concentrating on specific project areas as
described below. Infrastructure investment projects should utilize the Almaty-Bishkek
Rehabilitation Project as a model for future activities, particularly in the
respect of tying investment to policy reforms designed to encourage trade.
The trade environment has deteriorated, particularly with respect to cross-border
trade. This reflects: (i) regional currencies that are not uniformly convertible, (ii)
frequent border closures sometimes due to security concerns, (iii) tariff structures
that impede trade, (iv) poor governance encouraging corruption in trade and
travel clearance, and (v) national policies oriented towards national self-sufficiency.
The ADB’s policy dialogue, supported by four regional workshops on
trade issues and bilingual publications needs to be continued and strengthened.
The recent membership of Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan in the ADB calls for
careful thought to understand the particular needs of these countries in the
context of the ADB’s regional efforts. Phase II has supported a study of the
needs and relevance of regional cooperation to Tajikistan after it joined the ADB
in 1998. It is anticipated a similar study would be undertaken in Azerbaijan and
Turkmenistan.
Modest, measured activities, should be undertaken to complement and support
strong country-specific ADB programs with regional projects where appropriate.
In this spirit, a workshop on rural financial systems development was held in
Bishkek in October 1999 to support cross-country discussion concerning policy
and institutional needs in the sector. This is expected to lead to further work in
this area. In the future, it may be worthwhile to extend ADB’s regional efforts
more broadly to address regional banking and financial issues. A workshop on
education reforms and policies is similarly planned for the region in 2001.
Equally important, the regional initiative’s plans and activities must be thoroughly
integrated within the country programs. The priorities for action established by
regional discussions must be consistent with ADB’s national programs of
assistance. Establishing pipelines of regional projects, as discussed below,
demand that loan, TA, staff, and consultant resources are budgeted within the
national assistance programs.
A more systematic and institutionalized approach should be adopted to facilitate
further progress in regional cooperation. As activities are moving from the
preparation towards the implementation stage, it is critical to ensure consistency
and compatibility of ADB supported activities with the countries’ development
priorities. Establishing an institutional framework would therefore enable effective
facilitation of high-level policy dialogue and consensus building among the
participating countries and between these countries and the ADB.
___________________
- A relatively focused program is important to effectively utilize limited resources in very staff-demanding
inter-country exercises. See similar conclusions in the recent IES:REG-99026, Impact Evaluation Study of
the Asian Development Bank’s Program in the Greater Mekong Subregion, December 1999. [Impact
Assessment-GMS]
Back
A. Phase I: 1997-1998 | Next IV. Sector Priorities and the Proposed Program 2001-2003 |