Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Regions and Countries

Home : Regions and Countries : Country Partnership Strategy : Document

Table of Contents
p. 2 of 7 BACK | NEXT
Executive Summary
I. Current Development Trends and Issues
II. The Government’s Development Strategy
III. ADB’s Development Experience
IV. ADB’s Strategy
V. ADB’s Assistance Program
VI. Risks, Performance Monitoring, and Evaluation
Country Strategy and Program 2003-2006: India

I. Current Development Trends and Issues

A. Economic Growth

1. Changing Dynamics of Growth. India is a fast-growing economy with growth rates of 5.6% in FY2001 and 4.4% in FY2002. However, these rates are lower than the average growth of 6.5% in the late 1990s, especially the high growth rates of 7–8% recorded during 1994-1996. The deceleration has sometimes been attributed to external shocks such as the Asian financial crisis of 1997, the events of 11 September 2001, or the poor monsoon of 2002. However, reduced growth over 5-6 years cannot be attributed to transient factors alone. Systemic factors have also been at work, driven primarily by fiscal imbalances (Figure 1). Growth was earlier led by public investment. However, the situation has changed significantly, especially since the late 1990s. Servicing of the burgeoning public debt1, the burden of large subsidies, and a sharp increase in government salaries in the late 1990s following the Fifth Pay Commission Report have crowded out public investment. It declined from 11.2% of gross domestic product (GDP) in FY1986, to 8.2% in FY1993, 6.6% in FY1998, and 6.3% in FY2002. Unfortunately, private investment failed to fully replace public investment as an engine of growth since the private sector was constrained by the large government draft from the total savings pool, and the low level of business confidence. The consolidated fiscal deficit of the central and state governments together is estimated at 9.3% of GDP in FY 2002. Private savings amount to about 26.5% of GDP; private investment, only 16.0%. Thus, almost 40% of private savings are transferred through the financial sector to finance the government deficit. The effect of this crowding out of private investment is compounded by slow progress of policy reforms and by policy uncertainties in some sectors. Reduced rates of public and private investment, in turn, constrain the expansion of capacity, and especially the development of infrastructure, thereby reducing the economy’s growth potential. Consequently, after a brief period of acceleration in the mid-1990s, growth has decelerated in recent years (Appendix 1, Table A1.2).

2. While the Government has no control over monsoons and external shocks (Figure 1), it can embark on an aggressive fiscal adjustment program to reduce the chronic revenue deficit and implement reforms to reduce policy distortion and policy uncertainty. These measures will revive business confidence as well as public and private investment, and shift the economy back to a high-growth path. Fiscal adjustment is discussed in chapters IV and V. Regarding other structural reforms, the results of the reform program initiated since 1991 have been mixed, with significant progress in some aspects and little or no progress in others. Box 1 summarizes the progress on reforms.

Box 1: Status of Structural Reforms

Industrial policy has seen the greatest progress. Public sector reservations have been reduced from 18 major industries to only 3: defense production, atomic energy, and rail transport. Similarly, industrial licensing has been abolished in all but a few environmentally sensitive industries. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, a major impediment to growth of large corporate groups, has been replaced by a new competition law. Trade policy has also been significantly reformed. Although tariff reduction has been slow, licensing restrictions on imports have been eliminated, and fixed exchange rates replaced with a managed float responsive to market conditions. Foreign direct investment (FDI) and 100% foreign ownership are now allowed in a large number of industries, and majority ownership is allowed in all others. FDI procedures have been greatly simplified. In addition, foreign institutional investors are allowed to invest in Indian companies through the stock market up to maximum shareholding limits, which are also being progressively liberalized. Privatization of public enterprises did not begin in earnest until 1999, but is now gaining momentum.

In the financial sector, a phased program of reforms started with the banking sector and capital market and was later extended to insurance. These reforms have been facilitated by assistance from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and other development partners. Administered interest rates have been abolished, prudential norms are being adjusted to meet international standards, and licensing of domestic and foreign private sector banks has been liberalized. More than 90% of banks now comply with capital adequacy standards, the ratio of nonperforming assets has been reduced significantly, and the share of private banks (domestic and foreign) in deposits has risen from 7% to 18% since 1991. FDI is now allowed up to 74% of equity in private banks. Also, a recent landmark legislation empowers the take-over of collateral assets of defaulting borrowers, thereby enabling banks to further curtail nonperforming loans. However, despite significant progress, banking reforms still have a long way to go. The two main challenges are the continuing public sector domination of banking and large public borrowing, which enable the banks to crowd out small and medium-sized businesses. In the capital market, a statutory regulator has been empowered to enforce transparent market participation. Electronic trading has also facilitated transparency. The Unit Trust of India (UTI), a monopolistic public sector-controlled mutual fund vehicle, has been restructured. Foreign institutional investors have entered the capital market, albeit cautiously, with about $21 billion portfolio investments over the past decade. The insurance sector has also been liberalized with a dozen new private companies in life or general insurance. Further development of a competitive insurance industry and further financial sector reform are essential to deepen the capital market and mobilize savings for long-term private investments, which are key to the Government’s high-growth strategy.

Progress in infrastructure reforms has varied from highly to moderately successful in some sectors to almost no progress in others. The most successful is telecommunications. The public monopoly has been abolished. Several private phone companies are now providing telecommunication services alongside public enterprises. Another success story is civil aviation. While international air travel has always been open to competition, the domestic civil aviation market was opened to private investors a few years ago. Two private domestic airlines have now captured about 53% of the market, and there are also several small local operators. The major metropolitan airports will soon be privatized. In the port sector, private investors have invested in significantly expanding the volume of port handling capacity, while the public sector port trusts, which earlier monopolized this subsector, are being corporatized.

In hydrocarbons, production and distribution of crude oil, petroleum, and gas have been liberalized. Foreign and domestic private firms are already major players in exploration, and will enter distribution after privatization of two major oil companies. In the road sector, government policy recognizes that private build-operate-transfer (BOT) investment will be limited to highways, expressways, and bridges that can be tolled, since roads are a classic example of public goods. Public investment was also constrained by shortage of resources. The situation has been transformed radically following the introduction of an earmarked cess on petrol and diesel, which is being used to develop national highways, state highways, and rural roads, with significant assistance from ADB and other development partners. Reforms in the power sector have been less successful. After unbundling generation, transmission, and distribution, private investment was allowed in generation. However, the response was very weak. Private investors knew that power generators would continue to depend on public entities in charge of transmission and distribution, especially bankrupt state electricity boards, to realize payments. The Government, supported by ADB and other development partners, has introduced an incentive scheme to induce state governments to reform the power sector. Distribution has been privatized in some states, and the Government has appointed regulatory authorities at the central and state levels. Railway sector reforms have been weak. The investment program is also flawed, and track renewal and maintenance very poor, leading to frequent accidents. However, the railway department has recently adopted a reform-cum-investment program, partly supported by ADB. Finally, the Government has started reforming inland waterways to encourage private sector investment. This program is also being supported by ADB.

3. Price Trends and Monetary Policy. Inflation declined marginally to 4% in December 2002, down from 4.3% in 2001, despite high international oil prices and a transition to market-determined hydrocarbon prices. The easing of prices despite a deficient monsoon is primarily due to the large surplus stock of food grain and global deflation. Money supply (M3) grew by 15.7% in 2002. The central bank progressively eased its monetary policy stance in 2001–2002 to revive growth, and has also been encouraging commercial banks to reduce their spreads. The central bank reduced the cash reserve ratio from 5.00% to 4.75%, and the bank rate from 6.50% to 6.25%. Subsequently, commercial banks have also lowered deposit and lending rates. However, the prime lending rate (PLR) of the major banks at 10.75-11.50% is still high in real terms. Also, the cost of money remains very high for nonprime borrowers.

4. External Sector. Growth of merchandise exports (11.4%) and imports (6.3%) in 2002 are marked improvements over the negative growth recorded during FY2001. International reserves now exceed $70 billion (excluding gold and special drawing rights), equivalent to over 14 months of imports (equivalent to 13 months imports net of short-term debts commitments). The sustained increase in reserves is mainly due to India’s large real interest rate differential compared to the international financial market. External capital flows are also encouraged by the modest level of external debt at about 21% of GDP, with an external debt service ratio of about 14% in FY2001. The Government has recently initiated some cautious steps to ease foreign exchange controls in view of the comfortable reserve position, and has also started prepaying external public debt.

B. Poverty

5. Growth-Poverty Nexus. High growth has led to significant and sustained poverty reduction (Appendix 3 A). The latest available official estimates indicate that poverty incidence has come down from 36% in 1993-94 to 26% in 1999-2000. In rural areas, the incidence of poverty is 27%; in urban areas, 23.6%2. The actual number of people in poverty came downfrom 320 million to 260 million during this period. Of this, about 193 million live in rural areas. A great deal of compelling evidence suggests that this decline in poverty is primarily attributable to growth3. The poorer the country and more widespread the poverty, the greater the importance of a broad growth-led poverty reduction strategy (PRS)4, as opposed to direct poverty intervention schemes targeted at specific types of deprivation. Unfortunately, the decline in poverty has not been uniform across states, and regional disparities are pronounced, with the southern and western regions doing much better than the northern and eastern regions5.

6. Social Development and Human Poverty. Poverty is multidimensional. The data cited above refer primarily to income poverty—the proportion of population living below a minimum level of expenditure. They do not capture trends in human poverty, which reflects deprivation in other dimensions of the quality of life. Based on this more inclusive metric, and with a human development index value of 0.577, India is ranked 124 out of 173 countries6. India recently released its own human development report, which reveals a positive correlation between the levels of economic and human development. The report reveals large interstate disparities in social development levels, and also the persistence of rural-urban and gender disparities between and within states. Changes in population structure have resulted in a larger graying population as per the latest 2001 census, while changes in the global environment have enhanced insecurity of livelihood, which impacts on human development. The spread of HIV/AIDS7 and other infectious diseases, stress, and pollution—all pose new challenges to human development (Appendix 3 B). The Government has increasingly recognized that providing basic social services such as access to education, health care, potable water, and sanitation is key to human poverty reduction. Accordingly, the recently approved Tenth Five-Year Plan (10th Plan) has programmed a significant increase of nearly 80% in social expenditure. The 83rd constitutional amendment recognizes the right to primary education as fundamental. Finally, in the more progressive states, participatory planning is being strengthened considerably, and social service delivery has improved following the decentralization of several government functions under the 73rd and 74th constitutional amendments.

7. Progress in Achieving Millennium Development Goals. India's performance in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) is mixed (Appendix 1, Table A1.1; and Appendix 3 A). India is one of the few countries on track for reducing income poverty, and is also likely to achieve the target for enrollment in primary education, and access to improved water sources. However, the country is lagging behind in female secondary enrollment and reduction of infant mortality rates.

C. Political Environment

8. Elections were held recently in six states. Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Delhi will go to the polls later this year. National elections are due in 2004. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party and its allies are in power in the central Government and in seven states. The Congress and other parties are in power in the remaining 21 states. While it has strengthened the forces of federalism, political plurality poses a challenge to coordinated macroeconomic management. However, the systems in place to harmonize state-level economic management with policies of the central Government and the central bank are working well. The success of elections in Kashmir and Gujarat despite terrorist attacks and communal violence is an important milestone in securing peace in the subcontinent. Tension between India and Pakistan has also eased since 2002. However, the global repercussions of the Iraq war could adversely affect economic performance.

D. Governance and Institutional Capacity

9. India has seen significant achievements in economic, political, and civil governance during the past decade, including some important reforms, decentralization, and other institutional changes (Appendix 3 C). However, important challenges remain, such as low levels of public accountability or transparency; bureaucratic inefficiency, harassment, and corruption; persisting law-and-order problems; and an overburdened and outdated justice system8. India’s performance according to the governance indicators of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has, therefore, been mixed, faring fairly well in democracy (polity, civil liberties, political rights, press freedom) but recording low scores for “rule of law and government effectiveness,” and performing poorly in tackling corruption (footnote 6). Performance in participation, trade union membership, nongovernment organizations (NGOs), and ratification of rights instruments has also been moderate and mixed. The recently finalized 10th Plan addresses challenges in governance as a priority.

E. Gender Assessment

10. Women’s status has improved in recent years (Appendix 3 D). The gender development index improved from 0.424 in 1995 to 0.560 in 2002 (footnote 6). The gender equality index improved to 67.6% in the 1990s compared with 62% in the 1980s (footnote 8). A national policy to empower women is now in place, and one third of the seats in local government are now reserved for women. This measure alone is likely to create a strong gender-equalizing force from below. Such improvements notwithstanding, important areas of concern remain. The sex ratio9 in the 0-6 years age group has declined continuously, maternal mortality rates remain high (Appendix 1, Table A1.1) and about 51.8% of women are anemic10. India is also lagging behind the MDG targets on enrollment for girls and elimination of gender disparity in secondary education. Deprivation also contributes to the increasing incidence of trafficking in women and children and of HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.

F. Private Sector

11. The state-dominated path of development notwithstanding, India has a long history of domestic and foreign private enterprise, going back at least a couple of centuries. The private sector accounts for 74% of GDP and 71% of total investment (Appendix 3 E). One measure of the impact of reforms on competitive private sector development is that half the top 100 companies, ranked by market capitalization, were not in the top 100 when reforms began in 1991. Another measure is that foreign direct investment (FDI) which was virtually zero in 1991, is now around $2 billion per year. However, it is still only 0.5% of GDP compared to 2.0–3.0% in many emerging market countries. Despite the many significant gains during the past decade, much remains to be done. While the control regime is less restrictive than a decade ago, bureaucratic control is still widespread, especially at the state government level, where industries need many clearances for land acquisition, construction, water supply, power supply, environmental compliance, etc. Complaints of delays, corruption, and harassment are common. In trade policy, the average tariff rate is still much higher than the prevailing weighted average tariff in East and Southeast Asia. Many reform measures are yet to be implemented in some infrastructure sectors and the financial sector. Finally, labor market rigidities impede private investment.

G. Environment and Natural Resource Management

12. India’s burgeoning population and rapid urbanization, explosive growth in number of vehicles, industrial activities, as well as the increased dependence of agriculture on fertilizers and chemicals, have led to rapid changes in the quality and stock of natural resources and in the urban environment (Appendix 3 F). In 22 cities, the air-quality index falls in the “dangerous” category. Water availability and pollution are reaching crisis proportions. The growth of human and livestock populations exerts great pressure on land and forests. India thus enacted important laws, especially the Environmental Protection Act of 1986, and established an institutional framework at the central and state government levels to address these challenges. However, more economic incentives, improved environmental monitoring, and better regulatory enforcement are needed to tackle national environmental issues.

H. Regional Cooperation

13. Although the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) has been in existence for 17 years, its achievements have been limited. However, India is now playing a leading role in the South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC) program initiated by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to promote subregional cooperation among Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, and Nepal. The program has made rapid progress, especially during the past 2 years. Working groups of officials from the four countries have developed action programs for priority subregional projects in energy; transport; tourism; environment protection; and trade, investment, and private sector cooperation. The working group for the last theme is chaired by India. Several loans and technical assistance (TA) with subregional implications in the transport and energy sectors are included in the India program. The northeastern states and West Bengal have an especially important strategic role as the eastern and western flanks of SASEC. India is also active in several other regional cooperation initiatives and bilateral programs with Bhutan, Maldives, Sri Lanka, and Nepal.

______________

  1. Total public debt is estimated at approximately 73% of gross domestic product (GDP).
  2. Government of India. Press Information Bureau. 2001. Poverty Estimates for 1999-2000. New Delhi. 22 February. (Issued by Planning Commission, Government of India based on data from the National Sample Survey Organization, 55th Round).
  3. Sundaram, K., and S.D. Tendulkar. 2001. Poverty in India: An Assessment and Analysis, and Implications for Country Strategy and Program in India: An Update. ADB supported study. New Delhi. See also International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2001. India: Recent Economic Developments and Selected Issues, IMF Country Report No. 01/181. Chapter VII. October. Washington, DC: IMF.
  4. Ahluwalia, M. S. 2002. Poverty, Growth and Globalization: Facts, Myths and Misconceptions. Lecture delivered under the Distinguished Speakers Program. ADB, Manila, 30 January.
  5. Deaton, Angus, and Jean Dreze. 2002. Poverty and Inequality in India. Economic and Political Weekly 37(36): 3729-48.
  6. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2002. Human Development Report 2002. Oxford: The University Press (Published for the UNDP).
  7. Human Immunodeficiency Virus /Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
  8. Government of India. Planning Commission. 2002. India: National Human Development Report 2001. New Delhi.
  9. Number of females per 1,000 males.
  10. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). 2000. India: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-1999. Mumbai.


<<Back
Executive Summary
Next>>
II. The Government’s Development Strategy

© 2009 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page