Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Regions and Countries

Home : Regions and Countries : Country Partnership Strategy : Document

Table of Contents
p. 3 of 6 BACK | NEXT
I. Current Development Trends and Issues
II. The Government's Development Strategy
>>III. ADB's Development Experience
IV. ADB's Strategy
V. ADB's Assistance Program
VI. Risks and Performance Monitoring and Evaluation
Country Strategy and Program Update 2007-2010: Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of

III. ADB's Development Experience

A. Impact of Past Assistance

60. Since resuming in 1993, ADB’s operations have expanded in volume and size. By the end of 2005, ADB had provided 55 public sector loans ($3.5 billion), 178 TA projects ($120 million), and 7 projects ($337 million) from its private sector operations. ADB also financed several GMS projects involving Viet Nam. Viet Nam is a top recipient of ADF resources, and is envisaged to be an important OCR borrower. Twenty-one of the 55 public sector loan projects have been closed. Project completion reports are available for 14 projects/programs:

  • 1 was rated highly successful
  • 11 were rated successful
  • 2 were rated partly successful
Project performance audit reports are available for six projects/programs; all were rated successful (Table A1.8). Private sector operations have included a cement plant, a private university, a hospital, two power projects, and a venture capital fund for SMEs.

61. ADB’s operations initially focused on rehabilitation and support to economic reforms. Since 2002 (under the last CSP), ADB has supported Government efforts to reduce poverty, focusing on:
  • sustainable growth
  • inclusive social development
  • good governance
  • geographically, the Central Region
A self-assessment of the last CSP41 concluded that the strategy was focused and selective, presented a coherent rationale, and was responsive, with poverty reduction as the overarching thrust. However, the self-assessment also concluded that ADB’s program could have been more focused with stronger link between the strategy and the program. ADB operations could have been better synchronized to build on its earlier intervention to maximize development results. A more focused approach could enhance effectiveness of project interventions and reduce transaction and overhead costs. Nevertheless, the program was responsive to ADB strategic thrusts and Viet Nam’s development strategy. Constructive partnerships have been developed with the Government and other ODA partners in advancing the development agenda for key sectors. Individual projects were responsive and contributed to development objectives and targets. Cross-cutting concerns were adequately addressed. Together with the increase in the portfolio size, there was also improvement in implementation.

62. As ADB provided direct support to the Government’s various successful development and reform programs, the development impact of ADB operations in Viet Nam was assessed as substantial. However, the lack of clearly specified results-based indicators in the past CSPs makes it difficult to directly assess the impact of ADB operations. The results-based approach used in this CSP should facilitate a more objective assessment of its development impacts.

B. Portfolio Performance and Status

1. Portfolio

63. As of end March 2006 there were 34 ongoing projects with a total lending of $2.3 billion in the public sector (Appendix 1, Table A1.6). The sectors with the largest share of ADB lending are:
  • energy (21.3%)
  • transport and communications (21.1%)
  • agriculture and natural resources (17.7%)
Most (31 out of 34) ongoing projects were rated satisfactory for implementation progress. For development objectives, 33 projects (97% of the portfolio) were rated satisfactory. The percentage of projects at risk fell from 15.2% in 2004 to 11.1% of ongoing projects in 2005, but remains above ADB-wide rates for at-risk projects. Contract awards and disbursements also improved in 2005, with net resource transfers significantly higher than in 2004.

64. Project implementation delays continue to be a persistent concern42 because of:
  • delays in recruiting consultants
  • centralized and lengthy decision-making processes
  • weak capacity in PMUs
  • inconsistent legal framework for ODA management and procurement
  • delays in applying social safeguards, particularly resettlement
  • delays in procurement
  • inadequate quality of project preparation, with important technical issues having to be solved during implementation
65. Actions have been taken to remove constraints on portfolio performance. ADB and Government loan and TA processing procedures have been harmonized to facilitate consultation and decision making by ADB and the Government to accelerate project approval. ADB has also worked closely with four other banks (AFD, KfW, JBIC, and the World Bank) to support Government efforts to streamline and harmonize ODA procedures including support to:
  • strengthen the legal framework for ODA, public investment, and public expenditure management
  • apply environmental and social safeguards by narrowing gaps between Government and ADB safeguard policies
  • conduct joint portfolio reviews every two years
These initiatives are laying the foundations for improved portfolio performance. Guidelines on ADB and Government financial and other procedures have been prepared to guide executing and implementing agencies and ADB staff during project implementation. ADB’s own project implementation capacity is also being strengthened. Periodic portfolio reviews and project specific meetings enable portfolio issues and project specific problems to be addressed more quickly.

66. Since ADB resumed operations in 1993 in Viet Nam, 18 suspected corruption cases have been referred to ADB’s Office of the Auditor-General for investigation. No proof of corruption was found in 17 of these cases and 1 remains under investigation. ADB treats corruption as a serious issue and invites the public to report suspected cases to ADB43. ADB is directly supporting the Government’s efforts to fight corruption through TAs to the Government Inspectorate and the State Bank of Viet Nam for the recently approved anti-money-laundering law.

2. Implementation Progress of the 2006 Assistance Program

67. The Rural Infrastructure for Sustainable Livelihood Improvement Project in the Central Region (with $55 million from ADF and $50 million cofinancing from AFD) programmed for 2006 has missed its processing schedule because of delays in mobilizing project preparatory TA. The ensuing lending project has been rescheduled to 2007 with the loan amount reduced from $55 million to $50 million. The project has since been merged with the Livelihood Improvement for the Central Coastal Provinces Project ($35 million), also programmed for 2007 and renamed Integrated Central Region Rural Development Project, totaling $85 million with an additional $35 million cofinancing from AFD.

68. The Central Region Small and Medium Towns Urban Development Project has been brought forward to replace the above slippage for 2006. Similarly, in the 2006 TA pipeline, three TA projects originally scheduled under the CSP Update for approval in 2006 have been reprioritized because of resource constraints:
  • Financial Decentralization for ADB-Funded Projects (moved to 2007)
  • Support to Thanh Hoa City Master Plan Preparation (included in the project preparatory TA for 2007)
  • Safeguard Monitoring and Capacity Building for Water Resources (combined with the project preparatory TA for the Water Resources Management [Sector] Project in 2007)
Support to Public Investment Planning has been merged with Capacity Building for Viet Nam’s Regional Cooperation Focal Points and approved in 2006.

3. Adjustments to the 2007–2008 Assistance Programs

69. Following the review of the project preparation and reprioritization by the Government and ADB to more strongly align the projects with the SEDP and the CSP results framework, the schedule and loan size of several projects have been adjusted. Some new projects have also been included at the Government’s request. Their project preparatory TA have also been adjusted accordingly.

70. Secondary Education for the Most Disadvantaged Regions project and Health Care for the Poor in Central Region project. The Secondary Education for the Most Disadvantaged Regions renames the project preparatory TA for Secondary Education and Quality Improvement in 2006 and the proposed lending project in 2007. Ensuing from the sector work carried out in 2005 and preparatory work in 2006, the proposed Health Care for the Poor in Central Region project, is on standby for 2007 and firm for 2008. The loan amount has been increased to $60 million.

71. SME Sector Development Program Loan—Subprogram II and the TA Loan for Preparation of PPP Expressway project. The project preparatory TA for SME Sector Development Program Loan—Subprogram II is being mobilized and the ensuing program loan ($20 million from ADF for the policy component) is considered firm for 2006 approval. There will be $20 million OCR lending for the leasing industry in 2007. Similarly, the processing of TA loan for Preparation of PPP Expressway project ($10 million) for engineering design of the selected expressway or its components has been brought forward to 2007. The ensuing loan will be on standby for 2009 approval.

72. Support for Implementation of the Public Administration Reform Master Program—Subprogram II. Preparation is rescheduled from 2007 to 2008 to suit the Government’s timetable for the second phase of the PAR master program. The project preparatory TA was approved in March 2006, with subprograms II and III to be combined and the ensuing loan for $60 million scheduled for approval in 2008.

C. Conclusions and Lessons for the Country Strategy and Program

73. Projects need to be designed to meet national and sector constraints and/or the specific needs of targeted project areas. ADB’s sector-specific experiences are discussed in the thematic and sector road maps (Appendix 3). Some of the key generic lessons are highlighted below.

74. Effective consultations and broad participation should be ensured during all stages of the project cycle. Projects need to be carefully designed to reflect the varying capacity of the various central and provincial institutions. This implies a need for adequate time and resources to ensure quality project designs at entry. A focused approach will facilitate more consistent and longer-term engagement in policy dialogue, capacity building, and financing of sector development. Collaboration with other partners is becoming more substantive, and approaches are becoming more sector-wide.

75. While linked to Viet Nam’s development strategies, many ADB-financed projects have been slow in implementation.44 In addition to efforts to improve project quality at entry, more concerted efforts to directly align the formulation and implementation of this CSP with SEDP processes and implementation monitoring systems may help reduce delays. Resource allocation will also be more performance-based (i.e., based on the proven capacity of executing agencies) to ensure that project impacts reach intended beneficiaries quickly. The sector approaches and results-based management adopted in this CSP aim to make this happen.

76. Support to promote private sector development—via a combination of policy-based lending and the development of nonbank financial institutions—has helped speed up the growth of the number and registered capital of private companies. Policy and institutional reforms supported by ADB have also been important in stimulating business investment and employment in agriculture and rural industry and services. Employment growth resulting from increased private investment underpinned the national success in reducing poverty. Thus, business-led growth is a major focus of this CSP.

77. Experience in Viet Nam has demonstrated that developing rural infrastructure links to the emerging national and regional infrastructure networks can have a major impact on reducing poverty. For example, the ADB-supported Hanoi–Lang Son highway and related infrastructure have caused a major economic transformation, with rapid increase in foreign and domestic investment in manufacturing along this transport corridor. The resulting jobs have had a major impact on reducing poverty. The CSP aims to build on this experience to support development of rural links with economic corridors connecting to national and regional markets.

78. ADB recognizes that rapid growth is triggering a rural–urban transition that can increase pressures on social stability and urban infrastructure. The CSP includes a proactive response to this challenge by supporting the development of physical and social infrastructure in rural towns and secondary cities to help mitigate potential urban poverty and environmental problems.

79. Capacity-building TA projects have resulted in more sustained and effective outcomes when project designs address institutional reform needs and change people’s behavior. These efforts take time, which is why ADB adopts a sector approach and will work more closely with other development partners. In addition, the primary CSP focus on improving governance and reducing corruption has shifted to initiatives directly linked to ongoing activities rather than stand-alone initiatives.

80. ADB experiences suggest various ways to help the Government reduce poverty. First, ADB’s support to economic growth and governance projects will help reduce poverty directly by helping increase private sector investment and create jobs and by ensuring more efficient use of resources, and indirectly by developing the foundations for increased tax revenue to help reduce poverty and improve public service delivery. Second, ADB could sharpen its focus on developing individual provinces (or municipalities), several adjoining provinces, or main economic corridors. Third, ADB could help the Government implement its targeted poverty reduction programs, going beyond poverty reduction support credits. Fourth, disaster mitigation measures could be incorporated as appropriate into project design to protect the general livelihood of the poor.

<<Back
II. The Government's Development Strategy
Next>>
IV. ADB's Strategy

© 2008 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page