| 1. Project rationale |
- What is the rationale of the project: what market or government failure does it address?
- What is the rationale for public sector involvement/private sector operations?
- What is the main alternative to the project?
- Have changes in policy been considered as an alternative to investments?
- Have efficiency improvements been compared with capacity expansions?
|
| 2. Macroeconomic and sectoral context |
- How does the project relate to the overall development strategy?
- What particular development problem does it address?
- What is the policy environment for the project: taxes & sub- sidies, trade controls, exchange rate & interest rate policy?
- How does the project relate to sectoral strategy?
- What is the sectoral policy context in terms of market structure and regulation?
- Is the project a priority public investment?
|
| 3. Project alternatives |
- Have project alternatives been considered in terms of location, scale, timing?
- How has the best alternative been chosen?
- Have the subprojects been ranked in an appropriate way?
- Has the least cost alternative been identified for the project or major subprojects?
- Has cost-effectiveness analysis been used when benefits cannot be quantified or valued?
- Has the most cost-effective means been identified?
- Is it also the most effective means?
- What is the additional cost of the most effective means?
- Does the project have several outcomes: how have they been weighted to assess cost-effectiveness?
|
| 4. Demand Analysis |
- What is the basis for projecting the demand for project output?
- How will demand be affected by income growth?
- What other sources of supply are there for meeting the demand?
- How will demand be affected by an increase in price or user charge?
|
| 5. Identification of costs and benefits |
- Have the without and with project situations both been described?
- Have all project costs, comparing the with and without project situations, been identified?
- Have all project benefits, comparing the with and without project situations, been identified?
- Which benefits have been quantified and valued, and which have not?
|
| 6. Use of shadow prices |
- Has an economic rate of return been calculated?
- Which numeraire has been used in the application of shadow prices?
- Has it been used consistently?
- Have project outputs been identified as nonincremental and incremental?
- Have they been valued appropriately?
- Was all the data available for valuing project outputs and inputs?
- Has a cost-effectiveness analysis been conducted where benefits cannot be measured?
- Have the major project costs been identified as incremental or nonincremental, and valued appropriately?
- Have benefits and especially costs been broken down into traded and nontraded items?
- What value of the SERF/SCF has been used: has it been correctly applied?
- Have more specific conversion factors been used for some items: how were they derived?
- What discount rate has been used: to choose between alternatives, and to assess economic viability?
|
| 7. Sensitivity analysis |
- What type of sensitivity analysis has been applied?
- Does it relate to underlying benefit and cost variables?
- Have the key variables been identified?
- Have switching values been calculated?
- What measures are proposed to monitor the key variables?
|
| 8. Risk analysis |
- Is there a quantitative risk analysis?
- Have probabilities been attached to any of the key sensitivity variables?
- Have institutional risks been assessed?
- Are there sufficient incentives for government participants in the project?
- What measures have been proposed for reducing project risks?
|
| 9. Financial and fiscal sustainability |
- Has the FIRR for the project been calculated?
- Have the financial returns to different project participants been calculated?
- Are they adequate to attract investment/ensure active involvement?
- What is the level of charges for goods and services?
- Is the economic analysis related to the charge level?
- What is the difference between the FIRR and EIRR, and what accounts for the difference?
- Have the average incremental financial and economic costs been calculated?
- What is the level of cost recovery?
- Is there any explicit or implicit subsidy to the project?
- What is the justification for the subsidy?
- Has the fiscal impact on the capital and recurrent budget been calculated?
- What will be the source of funds to meet net fiscal requirements: extra taxation, extra borrowing, or a reallocation of expenditure?
|
| 10. Environmental sustainability |
- Have the environmental effects of the project been identified: costs and benefits?
- How have they been quantified and valued?
- Are they expressed in the same numeraire as the basic economic analysis?
- Have they been integrated into the economic analysis: for choosing between project alternatives; for assessing economic viability?
- Have required mitigatory and monitoring expenditures been identified?
|
| 11. Distribution analysis |
- Has a distribution analysis been undertaken for the project?
- Have levels of income been projected both without the project and with the project?
- Has the effect of different levels of charges for goods and services been assessed for operators, customers and government?
- Has the distribution of costs, especially on the poor, been identified?
- Has the distribution of benefits, especially to the poor, been identified?
- What proportion of net benefits will go to poor people?
- Is the distribution of costs and benefits analyzed by gender?
- Is there a substantial foreign involvement in investment and operation?
- Has the proportion of incomes and revenues going to foreign investors, lenders and workers been identified?
|
| 12. Benefit monitoring and evaluation |
- What are the key variables necessary to identify project impact during implementation and operation?
- Does this include key performance variables, physical or financial, for the implementing agency?
- Is a system in place to collect data on all the key variables?
|
| 13. Overall assessment |
- Have the major conclusions of the economic analysis been clearly spelt out?
- Does the project incorporate the best alternative?
- Is the project economically viable?
- Are any policy changes necessary to complement project implementation?
- Are any capacity building measures necessary: to provide incentives or training to the executing agency and other participants?
|