Home
Publications
Catalog
Online Publications
Document
Guidelines for the Economic Analysis of Projects : XVI. Appendices
Appendix 9 : Economic Valuation of Project Output and Input1. The economic valuation of project output and input is undertaken within a common conceptual framework. This framework distinguishes incremental output from nonincremental output, and incremental input demand from nonincremental input demand. This appendix outlines the conceptual framework and Appendixes 10 and 11 apply the framework to tradable and nontradable goods, respectively. I. Project Output2. The economic price (EP) of project output is the gross economic benefit per unit of output. The EP is equal to the gross economic benefit (GEB) of the project divided by project output (QP ). 3. The competitive market model provides a framework for valuing project output (see Figure 1). A project is represented by a rightward shift in the supply curve, with output being produced at a lower cost. The market price of project output falls from PWO to PW and the quantity sold increases from QWO to QW. The project displaces a part of supply that was provided at a higher price. The incremental output of the project is (QW- QWO) and nonincremental output is QP less incremental output. The gross economic benefit of the project is therefore made up of two parts: gross benefit from incremental output and gross benefit from nonincremental output. 4. The GEB from incremental output is represented by the light-shaded area under the demand curve, defined by PWO, PW, QW, QWO. It comprises incremental revenues (area below the price line) and consumer surplus (area above the price line). 5. The GEB from nonincremental output is represented by the dark shaded area under the without project supply curve, defined by PWO, QWO, QE, PW, where QE is the supply of output from other sources with the project. It is the cost to the economy of producing nonincremental output without the project. 6. The GEB of the project is equal to the average market price with and without the project, multiplied by project output, and the EP of project output is equal to the GEB divided by the project output.
7. In this illustration, it is assumed there are no distortions in any product or factor markets. However, with government intervention, the market price, demand price, and supply price may differ. Figure 2 shows the result of an ad valorem consumption tax and production subsidy. The consumption tax shifts the demand curve leftward by the amount of the tax, while the production subsidy shifts the supply curve rightward by the amount of the subsidy.
8. Gross benefit from incremental output (QD) is shown by the area under the before-tax demand curve, which is equal to the product of the average demand price (DP) with and without the project, and QD. Gross benefit from nonincremental output (QS) is shown by the area under the before-subsidy supply curve, which is equal to the product of the average supply price (SP) with and without the project, and QS.
II. Demand and Supply Elasticities9. The EP can also be derived using the price elasticities of demand and supply for the project output. The EP is based on the weighted average of the demand and supply price of project output, with the weights depending on the price elasticities of demand and supply.
Where distortions appear in other commodity or factor markets, the demand price and supply price have to be adjusted for these. III. Project Input10. The EP of a project input is the economic cost per unit of input. The EP is equal to the economic cost (EC) of the project input divided by the quantity demanded (QP). 11. The competitive market model again provides a conceptual framework for valuing a project input (see Figure 3). The input demand by the project is represented by a rightward shift in the total demand curve for the input. The market price of the project input rises from PWO to PW and the total quantity demanded increases from QWO to QW. At the higher price, the new project bids some supply away from existing projects. The incremental quantity demanded is (QW-QWO ) and the nonincremental quantity demanded is [QP - (QW-QWO )]. The economic cost of the project input is therefore made up of two parts: the economic cost of the incremental quantity demanded and the economic cost of the nonincremental quantity demanded.
12. Without any distortions in commodity or factor markets, the EC of the incremental quantity demanded by the project is represented by the light-shaded area under the supply curve, defined by PWO, PW, QW, and QWO. It comprises the incremental cost of increasing supply to meet project demand. 13. The EC of the nonincremental quantity demanded by the project is represented by the dark-shaded area under the without project demand curve, defined by PWO, QWO, QE, and PW. It comprises the economic benefit foregone by the without project buyers of the project input, as measured by their willingness to pay. 14. The total EC of the project input is equal to the average market price with and without the project multiplied by the quantity of input demanded by the project. The EP is equal to the EC divided by the quantity of input demanded. 15. The input market represented in Figure 3 is perfectly competitive. However, with government intervention, the market price, demand price, and supply price may differ. Figure 4 shows the result of an ad valorem consumption tax and production subsidy. The consumption tax shifts the demand curve leftward by the amount of the tax, while the production subsidy shifts the supply curve rightward by the amount of the subsidy.
16. With no distortions in other markets, the EC of incremental input (QS) is shown by the area under the before-subsidy supply curve, which is equal to the product of the average supply price (SP) with and without the project, and QS. The EC of nonincremental input (QD) is shown by the area under the after-tax demand curve, which is equal to the product of the average demand price (DP) with and without the project, and QD.
IV. Demand and Supply Elasticities17. The EP can also be expressed in terms of the price elasticities of demand and supply for the project output. The EP is based on the weighted average of the demand and supply price of project output, with the weights depending on the price elasticities of demand and supply.
Where distortions appear in other commodity or factor markets, the demand price and supply price have to be adjusted for these. V. Application18. In principle, the framework provided here can be applied to any project output or input. It is especially relevant on the output side to analyze the effects of a project producing nontraded outputs, where adjustments of both quantities and prices are confined to the domestic economy and are therefore likely to be larger. It can also be applied to all types of project impact, to materials and services, equipment, construction, and labor, as well as to factors of production more broadly defined, such as capital or foreign exchange. In each case, the approach requires the analyst to assess the market structure for a good, and to work out what the incremental and nonincremental project effects will be. ____________________________________ 1 The formulations in this Appendix are based on linear demand and supply functions. The numerical values for the coefficients can be adjusted for circumstances where the demand and supply functions take a different form.
|
| © 2008 Asian Development Bank Privacy | Terms of Use |
|