Publications

Home : Publications : Online Publications : Document


Table of Contents
p. 100 of 203 BACK | NEXT
Foreword
1. Introduction to the Guidelines
2. User Instructions
3. Preparing and Appraising Investment Project
4. Financial Management of Executing Agencies
5. Reporting and Auditing
5.1. Financial Reporting and Auditing Overview
5.2. Accounting Standards and Policies
5.3. Financial Reporting
5.4. Auditing Standards and Auditor Engagement
5.4.1 Introduction
5.4.2. ADB Requirements
5.4.3. Auditing Procedures
>>5.4.4. Auditor Selection and Appointment
5.4.5. Issues in Auditor Selection
5.4.6. Selecting Auditors
5.4.7. Terms of Reference for an Auditor
5.4.8. Contract or Engagement Letter of Auditor
5.4.9. International Standards on Auditing
5.4.10. Government Auditors
5.5. Reviewing Financial Reports
5.6. Reviewing Auditors' Reports
6. Financial Institutions
7. Knowledge Management
Financial Management and Analysis of Projects : 5. Reporting and Auditing : 5.4. Auditing Standards and Auditor Engagement

5.4.4. Auditor Selection and Appointment

5.4.4.1. Legal and professional requirements will normally determine the scope and depth of an audit examination, but these may also be supplemented by client instructions in the form of a TOR. These instructions would usually extend an audit's scope and detail, but they may restrict an auditor's activities rendering them unacceptable. Care should be taken when framing a request for additional work from an auditor.

5.4.4.2. Borrowers should be asked to remove unacceptable restrictions, or otherwise arrange for an acceptable audit to be carried out. A borrower is responsible for the selection, appointment, and performance of an auditor. ADB wishes to be informed by a borrower of an ongoing or proposed appointment of an auditor, who should meet the required standards in terms of independence, experience, and competence. More specifically, ADB should indicate the acceptability of an auditor in the form of a “no objection” provided that actual or proposed auditors satisfy the following criteria:

  • They must be impartial and independent of the management of the entity to be audited, and of the person appointing them. In particular, the auditors should not otherwise be employed by, serve as directors for, or have any financial or close business relationship with the entity during the period covered by the audit.
  • They must be well-established and reputable using procedures and methods that conform to ISAs or INTOSAI auditing standards, and employ adequate staff with the skills and competence required for their responsibilities.
  • They must be able to demonstrate experience in auditing the accounts of projects or entities comparable in nature, size, and complexity to the assignments they are to undertake (specialized auditing experience, obtainable only from external sources, may be necessary for some projects).
  • The audit work should be assigned to personnel who have the professional and technical training and proficiency required in the circumstances.

5.4.4.3. ADB requires that the borrower and the project implementing entity select and appoint an auditor acceptable to ADB within sufficient time to carry out its responsibilities, including a review of the financial management systems at the beginning of project implementation, and periodically thereafter.

5.4.4.4. ADB does not normally advise on the selection of auditors, but prefers to review a list of several auditors submitted from whom an appointment will be made by the borrower, and indicating any auditor who may not meet ADB's criteria. ADB will indicate its agreement to a proposal to engage an auditor when it is satisfied that an existing auditor, or the auditor under consideration for engagement, would be acceptable to ADB in terms of independence and competence to carry out the audit.

5.4.4.5. Many prospective borrowers and EAs have ongoing audit arrangements. In other cases, borrowers initiate audit engagements at the start of a project. Whenever an auditor is to be appointed by a borrower, or the auditor is a statutory appointee, ADB may seek information to be satisfied regarding independence and experience of the proposed auditor. To ascertain acceptability, ADB routinely seeks information to be satisfied on the independence and competence of the proposed auditor. The required information includes: (i) the name of the auditor; (ii) the names, qualifications, and experience of the principals and managers; (iii) the approximate number of professional staff employed; (iv) a listing of some of the main audits currently and previously carried out by the auditor; and (v) a statement of the independence of the firm of auditors vis-à-vis the entity it is proposed to audit.



<<Back
5.4.3. Auditing Procedures
Next>>
5.4.5. Issues in Auditor Selection