 |
Table of Contents |
 |
|
|
Financial Management and Analysis of Projects :
5. Reporting and Auditing :
5.4. Auditing Standards and Auditor Engagement
5.4.9. International Standards on Auditing
5.4.9.1. The International Auditing
Practices Committee (IAPC) of IFAC promulgates ISAs and International
Auditing Practice Statements (IAPSs). The latter offer advice and
guidance on the practical application of ISAs.
5.4.9.2. ADB expects auditors to conform
to the ISAs and related auditing practices recommended in the IAPS.
However, in some countries, the auditing profession may be required
to comply with generally accepted local auditing standards prescribed
either by law or by the national body of accountants.
5.4.9.3. Auditors when compiling their
opinions and reports, often use the term "generally accepted
auditing standards". These standards differ from country to
country, but are intended by the accounting profession to imply
the highest standards of auditing practice. These standards are
likely to be those adopted by professional accountants or associations
of accountants, or standards prescribed by law, governments, or
bodies responsible for regulating national financial reporting.
5.4.9.4. Although ISAs and IAPSs are
widely recognized, it should not be assumed that these have been
adopted by national accounting professions or governments, and are
therefore automatically applicable to audits and auditors of project
entities. Local standards may not conform partially or completely
with international guidelines.
5.4.9.5. Therefore at project identification,
or during project preparation, analysts are required to accurately
determine the auditing standards that will be applied by an auditor
of annual financial statements of a borrower. If these do not correspond
to ISAs and IAPS, the analyst must determine the extent and impact
of variances in application of the local standards.
5.4.9.6. In the event that the impact
of variances is sufficient to give rise to concerns for the adequacy
and veracity of an audit, the analyst must request the EA to have
the auditor adopt ISAs and IAPS for the audit of the ADB-financed
project and the project entity. Where applicable, an auditor who
would adopt ISAs and IAPS may be engaged.20
5.4.9.7. Failure by an EA to meet
such requests must be reported in the Aide Memoire and the fact-finding
BTOR. If agreement is not obtained by project appraisal, an Issues
Paper should be prepared so that management can give guidance. The
BTOR and the RRP should include confirmations of the acceptable
auditing standards that will be used.
5.4.9.8. Where necessary, the EA should
also be requested to ensure that auditors be required by their terms
of reference to indicate in their opinions and report, the extent
of any differences, and the impact on the audit, by their use of
local auditing (or other) standards compared to the use of the ISAs.21
For an example, see box that follows.
|
Auditing
in a Computer Information Systems Environment
International Standard on Auditing—Auditing
in a CIS Environment—requires possession of certain
levels of skills and competence with regard to computing hardware
and software by the auditor, and of those who they are supervising.
The TOR for an auditor should specifically
call for a statement of the auditor's skills and competence
in this field, and the report by the auditor should contain
a statement indicating the extent to which they were able,
or could not meet the requirements of this Guideline, and
the impact on the audit of any deficiency on their part.
Such a requirement is relatively simple to
check. In EAs which have computing facilities, if the auditor
fails to confirm that they were able to comply with this Guideline,
or to make any meaningful statement as to the capability and
quality of their audit of information compiled by computing
facilities in the agency, it must be questionable whether
the audit report and opinion offered could be acceptable to
ADB.
ADB = Asian Development Bank, EA = Executing
Agency, CIS= Computer Information Systems ,
TOR = Terms of Reference
|
_________________________
20
Financial Analysts have discretion to agree alternative arrangements
(see paragraph 2.4.3).
21
Financial Analysts have discretion to agree alternative arrangements
(see paragraph 2.4.3).
Back
5.4.8. Contract or Engagement Letter of Auditor | Next 5.4.10. Government Auditors |