Publications

Home : Publications : Online Publications : Document


Table of Contents
p. 112 of 203 BACK | NEXT
Foreword
1. Introduction to the Guidelines
2. User Instructions
3. Preparing and Appraising Investment Project
4. Financial Management of Executing Agencies
5. Reporting and Auditing
6. Financial Institutions
6.1. Introduction and Overview
6.2. Reviewing FI Financial Management
>> 6.3. FI Investments
6.4. Assessing FI Performance
6.5. Appraisal Checklist
6.6. FI Reporting and Auditing Issues
7. Knowledge Management
Financial Management and Analysis of Projects : 6. Financial Institutions

6.3. FI Investments

6.3.1. Introduction

6.3.1.1. This section describes ADB's approach to FI investments. It discusses selection of participating institutions and appraisal approaches.

6.3.2. Investing in FIs

6.3.2.1. ADB's involvement in a country's financial sector is set out in the CSP and driven by ADB's overarching poverty-reduction objective. As relevant, the CSP: (i) shows how the financial sector affects country development prospects; (ii) highlights reforms to be supported by ADB financial sector operations, including their sequencing; and (iii) states why the proposed operation is the appropriate vehicle for ADB support for reforms.

6.3.2.2. As appropriate, ADB consults with the IMF, the World Bank, and selected donors on proposed FI lending, and it coordinates its financial sector strategies and operations with theirs.

6.3.2.3. One of the forms of ADB's intervention in the financial sector is an FIL. Under an FIL or an FIL component of an investment loan, ADB provides funds to eligible participating FIs for onlending, at the FI's risk, to final borrowers.

6.3.2.4. The appraisal should ensure that the following objectives of FI lending include: (i) supporting reform programs in the financial sector or related real sectors; (ii) financing real sector investment needs; (iii) promoting private sector development; (iv) helping to stabilize, broaden, and increase the efficiency of financial markets and their allocation of resources and services; (v) promoting the development of the participating FIs; and (vi) supporting the country's poverty reduction objectives.

6.3.2.5. FILs are provided in the context of sound analytical work on sector issues, appropriate technical assistance, and, as relevant, adjustment operations to address policy issues.

6.3.2.6. ADB's intervention in the financial sector may also be in the form of other lending instruments (e.g., structural and sector adjustment loans and technical assistance loans), guarantees, and nonlending activities (e.g., country economic and sector work, training, and financial advisory services).

6.3.3. Selecting Participating Institutions

6.3.3.1. ADB's Economics and Research Department (ERD) developed a paper in 1999 that explored in detail approaches to selecting participating financial institutions in credit projects. This paper, Towards Good Practice, can be accessed in the Knowledge Management section of the web-based Guidelines.

6.3.4. Appraising an FI Investment

6.3.4.1. Introduction

6.3.4.1.1. ADB's appraisal of an FIL should:

  • confirm, with justifications, if it is the appropriate intervention to achieve the desired objectives with due regard to the sustainability of the financial sector;
  • establish the financial and economic justifications for the operation;
  • confirm, for an FIL justified by its poverty-reduction goals, that it is a practicable, cost-effective way of achieving such goals;
  • confirm the eligibility of FIs proposed for inclusion; and
  • confirm that implementing the FIL is not likely to undermine the financial condition of participating FIs.

6.3.4.1.2. The economic analysis of an FIL should take into account the prevailing and expected macroeconomic environment and substantiate that the proposed operation will lead to net economic benefits arising from policy and institutional changes and increased availability of investment funds.

6.3.4.1.3. If the justification for an FIL depends critically on addressing perceived market failures (i.e., nonmarket effects or externalities), the analysis should explain the assumptions and their empirical basis. If there is evidence of a subsidy involved in an FIL such that resources, through interest rates or other forms, are provided below their economic opportunity cost, the extent of subsidy dependence must be calculated and assessed.

6.3.4.1.4. Risk analysis should be used to demonstrate how robust the projected economic benefits of the project are to possible changes in assumptions about the macroeconomy, borrower commitment to the reforms supported by the FIL, and institutional performance. Note that this reference to risk analysis should not be confused with market risk and associated indicators.

6.3.4.2. Sub-Projects

6.3.4.2.1. Increased production of goods and services should be established at the subproject level. It must be derived from expanding existing productive capacity, increasing the efficiency of capacity utilization, or creating new types of productive capacity. Working capital financing to maintain existing levels of production is not eligible for ADB financing.

6.3.4.2.2. FILs are used to finance investments in subprojects for increased production of goods and services. The subprojects must meet eligibility and development criteria agreed with ADB. ADB agrees with the borrower on appropriate arrangements to monitor subproject compliance with these criteria. In addition to the above criteria, the appraisal should ensure that subprojects are financially viable and technically, commercially, managerially, and environmentally sound.

6.3.4.3. Use of ADB Funds

6.3.4.3.1. The borrower may pass on ADB funds to a FI either as a loan or as borrower's equity; similarly, FIs may pass on ADB funds to subborrowers as subloans or equity investments. In all cases, ADB funds are disbursed against eligible expenditures for goods, works, and services.

6.3.4.3.2. FILs are normally amortized by ADB's borrowers on country terms as established by ADB and not on a back-to-back basis (by earmarking subborrowers' repayments for amortizing the ADB loan). The borrower may pass the funds on to FIs either on a back-to-back basis or on the basis of another amortization schedule acceptable to ADB.

6.3.4.3.3. When FI loan repayments to the borrower are not on a back-to-back basis, FIs may, within their overall loan amortization schedules, use repayments for purposes that are consistent with their business strategies, or for prepayments to the borrower. Under an apex or two-tier lending arrangement, ADB funds are passed initially to an apex (first-tier) institution, which onlends them to the participating retail financial institutions.

6.3.4.3.4. An FI with actual or potential conflict of interest cannot serve as an apex institution.

6.3.4.3.5. Two-tier lending arrangements are common, but a three-tier arrangement may be feasible, particularly to address micro-credit operations.

6.3.4.4. Onlending Terms

6.3.4.4.1. FIL onlending terms are set in the context of a borrowing country's interest rate structure and any agreed program for interest rate reforms.

6.3.4.4.2. ADB funds are priced to be competitive with what the participating FIs and their subborrowers would pay in the market for similar money, taking into account, as relevant, maturities, risks, and scarcity of capital.

6.3.4.4.3. When interest rates are not market-determined and there is an agreed program of interest rate reforms, FIL funds are onlent to participating FIs at interest rates agreed with ADB that: (i) are not negative in real terms; (ii) provide adequate margins to FIs to cover all costs, including credit and other risks, and an adequate profit margin; and (iii) do not discourage resource mobilization from the market by providing a price advantage in using FIL funds.

6.3.4.4.4. ADB funds may be onlent to participating FIs and their subborrowers in either foreign exchange or domestic currency on the basis of prudent credit decisions, including prospective subborrowers' ability to bear the foreign exchange risk to avoid later credit risk. Where interest rates are market-determined and there is relatively easy capital movement, local currency interest rates include an implicit premium that reflects market expectations in regard to exchange rate changes. In such situations: (i) ADB FIL funds are onlent to FIs in either local or foreign currency, provided the on lending interest rates are consistent with prevailing interest rates in the borrowing country for comparable credit; and (ii) FIs normally onlend to subborrowers in the same currency or currencies that the FIs borrowed.

6.3.4.4.5. If interest rates are not market-determined but are set administratively, it is not possible to determine market expectations of exchange rate changes, as foreign exchange risks may be under priced in local currency interest rates. Therefore, the foreign exchange risk of FIL funds is borne either by: (i) subborrowers through borrowing and repayment in foreign currency, or (ii) the government if onlending and repayment are in domestic currency at prevailing administered interest rates. In the latter case, the government charges a fee that is passed on to FIs and subborrowers to offset the anticipated foreign exchange risk.

6.3.4.5. Monitoring Financial Institutions Investments

6.3.4.5.1. During project appraisal and negotiations, provision is made for effective monitoring and evaluation of the FIL's progress toward its objectives and development impact throughout the life of the project.

6.3.4.5.2. The performance indicators agreed on at loan negotiations cover sectoral, financial, and institutional variables.

6.3.4.5.3. The variables for the FIs include among other things, adequacy of capital, quantity and quality of earnings, quality of assets, sufficiency of liquidity, extent of subsidy dependence, effectiveness of FI loan administration (appraisal, supervision, and collection performance), and adequacy and timeliness of preparation of audited financial statements. During implementation, ADB, the borrower, and the FIs in each tier must use the agreed performance indicators, implementation progress reports, and a review of a sample of subprojects to monitor the FIL's progress.

6.3.4.5.4. At least once each year during implementation, ADB conducts a formal review of the condition and performance of participating FIs, including a review of their audited financial statements, to determine their continued compliance with eligibility criteria. The findings of this review are to be recorded in supervision reports.



<<Back
6.2. Reviewing FI Financial Management
Next>>
6.4. Assessing FI Performance