Home
Sectors and Themes
Water
Projects
Pilot and Demonstration Activities
Pilot and Demonstration Activities
|
| Proponent | Daniele Ponzi, Pacific Regional Department |
| Region | Melanesia |
| Country | Solomon Islands and Vanuatu |
| Cost Estimate | $50,000 |
| Partners | Live and Learn |
| Type | Public Awareness |
| Category | Basin Management |
| Approval Date | 7 August 2003 |
| Status | Completed |
Rivers and freshwater resources in the Western Pacific are under constant pressure from conflict, logging, mining, large-scale tourism, soil erosion, and sedimentation. This has severe impact on many communities living adjacent to non-terrestrial environments.
Often, policy has had to protect the water resources due to lack of community ownership, empowerment and participation, and missing dialogue between government officials and the communities themselves.
The Live & Learn Environmental Education group is committed to developing water-education approaches that have the capacity to challenge the many threats facing water resources. They have had considerable experience in the Pacific with a community development methodology that delivered impressive results in fostering positive community action, social cohesion, and a collective sense of responsibility as regards environmental issues.
This activity will enable Live and Learn to work with poor communities in Vanuatu and Solomon Islands to further explore the educational methodologies that have the capacity to create changes to water management at a local community level. They plan to use water quality monitoring as a community entry issue.
The performance and effectiveness will be determined through qualitative indicators from internal evaluation that will be done through interviews and focus group discussions. The internal evaluation will focus on four key areas:
Some issues: How well did the Learning Circle/Water Quality Monitoring function? Were they open to men, women, and youth? Could the community achieve their objectives? Did the process complement/compromise cultural contexts? Were the principles of open participation reflected through the Learning Circles?
Some issues: Did the community participants come away with a greater understanding of sustainable water management at a community and national level? What actions did the Learning Circles lead to in relation to inter-ethnic dialogue? What actions did the Learning Circles lead to in relation to dialogue between community members and government departments? How were young people empowered to advocate for community action to reduce poverty? What networks were established? Did the Learning Circles produce written material? Did the Learning Circles strengthen the capacity of participants to engage in public debate?
Some issues: Who participated? What were the age and gender profiles of the participants? Was the project most effective in urban or rural areas? What was the level and quality of participation from chiefs and church leaders?
Some issues: Are the Learning Circles applicable to other community issues? How can target communities engage in multiplying the program benefit? How applicable are the learning methodology to other areas of the Asia/Pacific region?
Performance indicators from external evaluation
Potential for replicability is high, even outside of the Pacific, and this potential is being explored within ADB for the Tonle Sap environmental management project in Cambodia.