Corporate Governance and Poverty Reduction
Seeking the “right” model for balanced growth poses
a challenge to Asian countries
By Arthur M. Mitchell (amitchell@adb.org)
General Counsel
Corporate governance is at a crossroads.
Many developing and
emerging economies already recognize
that good corporate governance
is crucial for sustainable economic
development. And many are searching for a
new or “right” model to apply to their specific
domestic environment.
Over the past decade, focus has been
increasing from outside—whether from
governments, foreign investors, or multilateral
development institutions like the
Asian Development Bank (ADB)—on issues
related to increased accountability,
transparency, and disclosure in corporate
governance systems.
Coupled with appropriate management
incentives to ensure the discipline
required for compliance, a balanced corporate
governance system can help distribute
wealth to a broader segment of
civil society.
While good corporate governance is critical,
it is important to realize that it goes
hand in hand with public governance reform.
Only an integrated approach will
ensure a balanced contribution to development.
After all, it is not possible to create
and run an island of good corporate governance
in a sea of poor or underdeveloped
public governance.
What influences Asia’s business structures?
Social and cultural heritage, through
religion and philosophy, stresses loyalty to
family. But contemporary Asian legal systems
also have roots in western civil and
common law legal traditions.
Despite this diversity, however, there are
similar challenges. If there is a common
denominator, it is the shift away from state-owned
enterprises and the monopolies of
family-controlled conglomerates to wider
ownership; more balanced control; more
independent board members; and deeper, more liquid, domestic capital markets.
Reformers currently face much resistance,
mostly in convincing traditional
businesses that it is ultimately in their best
interests to adopt reforms.
The reason for the resistance is simple.
Both major developed nation models—the
“bank-centric” system (like those in Germany
and Japan) and the “market-centric”
system (as in the United Kingdom and the
United States)—have shown their weaknesses
of late. Relationship capitalism in
Japan led to a slew of nonperforming loans
and a no-growth decade, while the Enron
and Worldcom scandals
called the US
model into question.
Good For All Good corporate
governance expands potential
markets, broadens ownership,
and helps reduce poverty
Legal culture has a
huge impact on what is
ultimately appropriate
for a country. And in
building the “right”
model for corporate governance,
perhaps it is
better to study what not
to learn from both bankcentric
and marketcentric
systems.
The key is to ensure
that corporate governance
reforms in emerging economies do
not dampen entrepreneurship, but rather
enhance economic development in a more
transparent and accountable fashion.
“It is not possible
to create and run
an island of good
corporate governance
in a sea of poor or
underdeveloped public
governance“
So instead of replicating the financial
systems that more prosperous countries
developed over many years, Asian countries
should focus on several issues.
- While strengthening legal frameworks
and institutions, Asian governments
must enforce laws equitably, resolving
the rule of law deficit (or implementation
gap) and build accountable public
governance—the precursor to a properly
functioning corporate governance
regime.
-
Bank-centric systems must be reformed
to clean up bad debts and nonperforming
loans and implement cutting-edge
risk management techniques.
- Systemic risks (like the 1997 financial
crisis) can be reduced if regulators and
investors diversify risks by promoting
robust local currency corporate bond
markets, among other things, as an alternative
to bank financing.
The need remains to convince governments,
dominant corporate families, and
the traditional “old-boy” domestic business
networks that reform must be real and
not merely legal lip service to outside pressure
or expectations.
They need to be convinced that good
corporate governance is truly in their best
interests. Good corporate governance expands
potential markets, broadens ownership,
creates alternate financing options,
and—most importantly—will help reduce
poverty.
Email this to a friend