Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Catalog

Home : Publications : Catalog : Online Publications : Document

Table of Contents
p. 23 of 34 BACK | NEXT
Executive Summary
Introduction
Good governance defined
The elements of good governance
The Bank’s concern with governance quality
The Bank’s approach to governance issues
Promoting the elements of good governance in Bank operations
Building governance capacity
Public sector Management
Public enterprise management and reform
>>Public financial management
Civil service reform
Participatory development processes
Legal frameworks
Information openness
The Bank’s modalities for enhancing governance in DMCs
Resource implications
Reporting arrangements
Governance: Sound Development Management : Promoting the elements of good governance in Bank operations : Building governance capacity

Public financial management

Improvements in accounting and auditing procedures are the first line of reforms in the public finance system. The Bank’s loan agreements routinely incorporate covenants on accounting and auditing requirements, and executing agencies are encouraged to strengthen financial management practices (for example, through performance-based budgeting and external audits). Going beyond the level of individual executing agencies, the focus of attention has to be the government budget, and the need for fiscal discipline. Given the concern with sustainability of programs and projects (e.g., allocations for operation and maintenance), what is of interest is not just public investment plans, but public expenditure as a whole (i.e., both capital and recurrent expenditures). Also important in this context are budgetary allocations within and between sectors, and the overall adequacy of the government’s development expenditures. Although the Bank endeavors to analyze these budgetary issues in DMCs, and to raise them in policy dialogue as appropriate (e.g., during country programming), it needs to be recognized that its capacity for full-blown public expenditure reviews is still limited.

An aspect that has been receiving increasing attention from donor countries is excessive “nonproductive” (e.g., military) expenditures by some recipient countries. The concern is twofold: first, budgetary allocations for military purposes should not crowd out development activities; and second, since money is fungible, external assistance for economic development should not have the effect of freeing up resources for unreasonably high military-related expenditure. These concerns are understandable and valid (although, to some extent, military expenditures may be supply-driven by armaments exporters from donor countries). At the same time, governments have a sovereign duty to protect their citizens and territories, and they act in accordance with their own perceptions of threat, rather than those of outsiders. To address these issues in a balanced, coordinated, and effective manner, funding agencies have used the forum provided by country aid groups or consortia (usually organized by the World Bank). Thus, in recipient countries where the military budget seems unduly large, the aid community usually expresses its concern at the annual consortium meeting, with the clear implication that the level of the overall aid commitments reflects that concern. As a member of such aid consortia, the Bank associates itself fully with such expressions of concern, provided the economic effect of military expenditure on the development process in the DMC concerned is unequivocal and demonstrable.

In addition to expenditure matters, the Bank also looks at ways to help DMC governments improve their domestic resource mobilization efforts, more directly through enhanced cost recovery by public utilities, but also including TA for policy reforms. Taxation is another aspect. Indeed, in many ways, the manner and effectiveness with which a government collects taxes are reflective of the standard of governance that prevails. Hence, the Bank provides training for tax policymakers, as well as TA for improving tax collection and administration.

Box 3 provides a flavor of the Bank’s activities for helping improve public financial management in DMCs.

Box 3: Public Financial Management

In collaboration with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the Bank has helped institutionalized program budget and project monitoring (PBPM) in Nepal. Under the first phase (1986), a program budgeting system for efficient and economical allocation of scarce resources in the public sector, and a project monitoring system, were set up in the Ministry of Finance (MOF). The second phase (1986) improved (i) the program budgeting system by including clear criteria and weights to accommodate multiple objective considerations when ranking projects in order of priority; and (ii) the project monitoring system by introducing a quantitative methodology, developing appropriate interface points among MOF, line ministries, and other government bodies, and providing training manuals and workshops. In the final phase (1989), PBPM systems in MOF were improved further and extended to line ministries with the long-term objective of making PBPM the basis for an integrated government system.

The Committee for Planning and Cooperation (CPC) is responsible for strategy and investments planning, managements of foreign investment, and coordination of external assistance. Since CPC is constrained by shortages of skills and experience, UNDP, in cooperation with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, provided technical assistance (TA) for taxation and customs reform, privatization, foreign investment promotion, and public investment planning. The Bank provided complementary assistance in macroecnomic planning (1990>. Under a follow-on project of the Government, UNDP, IMF and the Bank (1993), an integrated framework is being introduced for the planning, programming, budgeting, and financing (PPBF) process. The Bank's contribution would strengthen the capacity of CPC and selected line ministries to undertake macroeconomic planning, policy analysis, formulation, and coordination, and help establish a public investment programming system that is integrated effectively into the PPBF process.

The Philippines introduced a value-added tax (VAT) in 1988, in replacement of a variety of sales taxes. Although, since then, the VAT emerged as a dynamic component of tax revenue, its potential yield (levied at 10 percent) seemed much larger than the amount of VAT actually collected (less than 1 percent). The Bank has, therefore, assisted the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to improve the VAT assessment, collection and planning systems, and computerization of these systems (1991). The major outputs of this TA were (i) an integrated final Information Systems Plan, the basis for computerization of all the taxes administered by the BIR and (ii) a detailed VAT information system. Together, these systems would help ensure a more uniform and widespread implementation of tax laws.

Financial accountability is a particular concern of the Bank in the Pacific developing member countries (DMCs). Although this problem is not unique to these DMCs, it is exacerbated by the lack of qualified auditors and the dearth of systematic training. The Bank, therefore, financed a program of audit manpower development workshops for the South Pacific DMCs to introduced updated audit techniques and to upgrade the technical skills of the participants (1989). This was followed by an audit training program for the same DMCs, covering two workshops: one on financial audit management and supervision, and the other on computers in the audit process (1994). The workshops emphasized in-house training and development of informal regional support networks for national audit offices.



<<Back
Public enterprise management and reform
Next>>
Civil service reform

© 2008 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page