 |
Table of Contents |
 |
|
|
Governance: Sound Development Management :
Promoting the elements of good governance in Bank operations :
Participatory development processes
Participation of beneficiaries and affected groups
The representation and participation of citizens heightens effectiveness
and accountability in development activities. This is particularly
true in the case of rural or community development projects and those
in the social sector at the grass roots level. Given the Bank’s growing
emphasis on equity issues, and hence on projects of this nature, The
Bank’s Medium-Term Strategic Framework (1993–1996) foreshadowed
a shift from “blueprint” (or engineering-intensive) projects to
“process-oriented” (or beneficiary-involvement) projects. Unlike
projects in the former category (where project parameters are reasonably
well known in advance), process-oriented projects commence
with only a broad but flexible design concept, the details of individual
components being worked out subsequently in close consultation with
potential beneficiaries. Even in blueprint projects, the Bank will ensure
consultations with groups likely to be positively or adversely affected,
providing an opportunity to improve project design or suggest ways
of mitigating adverse impacts.
To help ensure implementation of more participatory approaches,
the pamphlet Guidelines for Incorporation of Social Dimensions into
Bank Operations was prepared and distributed to DMC agencies and
Bank staff concerned. The pamphlet also includes guidelines for social
preparation of beneficiaries, essentially a preinvestment phase designed
to strengthen the absorptive capacity of communities by helping them
form local (grass roots) organizations that can serve their development
needs in an ongoing way. The report of the TFIPQ emphasized the
need for beneficiary consultation at even earlier project stages, such as
during project identification and programming. However, as that report
pointed out, there remain serious constraints that inhibit greater use of
participatory techniques of project design and implementation. These
include inadequate appreciation by government agencies of the significance
of participation, their lack of related skills and capacity, lack
of appropriate skills and capacity of the beneficiary groups, as well as
the limited number of experienced, socially oriented consulting firms,
both within DMCs and internationally.
Box 5 contains two illustrations of Bank projects in which beneficiary
participation has been promoted actively.
|
The National Irrigation Authority (NIA) of the Philippines has been active in
involving beneficiaries in its operations. Of around 1.5 million hectares under irrigation
in the country, about 42 percent is served by national irrigation systems, another
42 percent by communal irrigation systems, and the remaining 16 percent by pump
irrigation systems. The communal and pump systems are operated and maintained by
farmer Irrigators' Associations (IAs), which were first introduced in the Philippines
some 20 years ago (with assistance of the Ford Foundation). The performance of IAs
in operation and maintenance (O&M) of communal systems has encourage NIA to
extend the concept of beneficiary-implemented O&M to the (larger-size) national systems.
With support from the World Bank and the United States Agency for International
Development (USAID), NIA is undertaking a program of restructuring and
strengthening IAs to help them cope better with these additional o&M responsibilities.
Under the Bank's Irrigation Systems Improvement Project (1990), five national
systems financed by earlier Bank-assisted projects are being rehabilitated and handed
over to IAs of O&M. Participation of IAs is envisage under all phases of project
development, viz. preparation, implementation, and operation. Their involvement in
the implementation of the civil works would recompense beneficiaries for any temporary
decrease of farm productivity caused by interruptions in water supply during
construction. The IAs will also be empowered increasingly to collect the irrigation
service fees. An institutional development component aims to reorganize the IAs
into cohesive larger groups with great self-reliance, and to initiate a cooperative
program that will give them better access to the credit facilities of the Land Bank of the
Philippines and other rural financing institutions.
In Pakistan, the Bank, along with the World Bank and other funding agencies, is
supporting the Social Action Program (SAP; 1994). The SAP, which covers the entire
country for a five-year period, embraces four subsector: (i) primary education,
(ii) primary health, (iii) population welfare, and (iv) rural water supply and sanitation
(RWSS). Its design is based on an annual assessment of objectives, targets, and policy
and institutional reform measures, and includes a review of the entire public sector
expenditure program related to the four subsectors. The SAP aims to improve access
and quality in the delivery of basic social services, with particular emphasis on rural
and underserved areas and with a considerable gender bias towards women. A
process approach has been followed in preparing and implementing the SAP, stressing
community involvement and participation of nongovernment organizations (NGOs)
and the private sector. Users' committees are being introduced in all RWSS activities,
and Village Education and Parent-Teacher Committees are being established for
supervision of schools. During FY1992/93, about 100 communities built their own
schools staffed by women teachers, paid by the Government. Similarly, increasing the
number of female, village-level family planning works will help community participation
under the population program, while community health workers will achieve the same purpose
in the health subsector. To promote NGO involvement, education and health foundations
are being established in the provinces, and privatization of basic health units and rural
health centers will be considered, where feasible. As a multiagency effort, the SAP will also
provide major opportunities for dialogue with the Government on social sector policy reform.
|
Back
Participatory development processes | Next Public sector/private sector interface |