Publications

Home : Publications : Online Publications : Document


Table of Contents
p. 12 of 14 BACK | NEXT
The need for a strategy
The strategy
The required internal changes
Operational orientation, skills, and processes
>> Operating principles
Instruments
The implementation plan
Private Sector Development Strategy : The required internal changes

Operating principles

To implement these fundamental changes required by the PSD strategy, two important operating principles are proposed to guide the delivery of assistance and concentrate ADB’s efforts on where it can contribute best.

“Think PSD” in public sector operations. This entails deliberate efforts by public sector operations to improve the enabling environment for the private sector and to use the experiences of PSO as inputs to these efforts. The new operational orientation calls for disciplined, sequenced examination of private sector alternatives at key stages of ADB projects: (i) at project preparation, asking whether the private sector can undertake the project without government assistance or, if not, whether a public-private partnership is feasible, or whether parts of the project can be undertaken by the private sector; or (ii) after project completion when construction and implementation risks no longer exist, asking whether the private sector can step in by taking over management and/or ownership, partially or wholly, or by refinancing government debt. The deliberate pursuit of private sector approaches to ADB’s public sector operations does not necessarily mean less public sector lending. It will, however, mean that public sector operations should focus more on projects (i) that involve direct poverty interventions and/or (ii) that private investors are not prepared to undertake.

“Think development impact” in private sector operations. PSO’s orientation will be to achieve greater development impact and/or demonstration effects, and work with governments to take deliberate steps to reduce poverty. At concept clearance and due diligence stages of any private sector project, due consideration should be given to ensuring development impact through, for example, employment opportunities, cleaner environment, access to public services, effective competition, and better corporate governance. At the same time, clarity and transparency should be observed in dealing with private sector partners to retain their confidence. Demonstration and catalytic effects are also important in PSO, and these will be pursued by seeking private sector projects that can be replicated if successful. To broaden the impact of PSO in the region, there may be a need to extend the reach of PSO to smaller DMCs or to sectors other than finance and infrastructure, which constitute PSO’s present core competence.

Box 4: Managing Conflict of Interest


Potential for Conflict of Interest
Under the Private Sector Development strategy, there is a need for greater partnership and synergy between ADB's different private sector development activities. However, this creates more potential for conflict of interest to arise because ADB needs to be able to respond to requests for advice on policy reform to attract private investment to a sector, and for direct assistance in catalyzing private investment in the same sector. A typical situation in which ADB is likely to be exposed to conflict of interest is when it provides policy advice to government on an issue in which it has a financial interest related to an existing or prospective private sector investment. This gives rise to significant reputation risk, and can jeopardize the ability of ADB to provide impartial advice or make impartial investment decisions.

A Suggested Approach for Managing Conflict of Interest
To manage the risk, ADB must first identify the specific situations in which conflict of interest is likely to arise and, second, put in place a framework to address the issues systematically and effectively. However, the framework must not rigidly separate advisory and investment staff or unduly restrict the flow of information. Otherwise, the benefits of closer coordination will be lost. The concerned departments and offices should be responsible for identifying potential conflict of interest in their projects and bringing this to the attention of senior management as necessary.

World Bank Group Approach
Owing to the merger of certain World Bank and International Finance Corporation infrastructure and advisory groups, and the increased potential for conflict of interest this entails, the World Bank Group is currently putting in place a system to manage conflict of interest based on the same principles. Additionally, the World Bank Group will establish a separate Conflict Office to provide another layer of oversight. However, the primary responsibility remains with the project departments and senior management.



<<Back
Operational orientation, skills, and processes
Next>>
Instruments