Publications

Home : Publications : Online Publications : Document


Table of Contents
p. 9 of 11 BACK | NEXT
What is governance?
The role of governance in the Bank's response to the Asian financial crisis
Interventions beyond the crisis
>>Next Steps
Summary and conclusions
Program Loans and Sector Development Loans with Governance Components, 1995-1998
Governance in Asia: From Crisis to Opportunity

Next Steps

The Bank reacted quickly to the Asian financial crisis by supporting banking, financial sector, and corporate governance reforms; fiscal decentralization; and structural reforms in health, education, and labor market policies. Aside from the response to the crisis, new governance policies are in place, specialized staff are being recruited, and Bank loans and technical assistance are increasingly targeted at improving governance in DMCs.

The basis for concerted and successful assistance has been laid. For this initial progress to be consolidated and expanded, progress in three priority areas is needed in the medium term: (i) better diagnostic tools and drawing on knowledge of good practice, (ii) improved implementation processes for governance reforms, and (iii) tracking evolving notions of good practice.

(i) Better diagnostic tools and drawing on knowledge of good practice: All governments need some basic capabilities to carry out essential functions effectively. The Bank needs to draw on appropriate knowledge, including manuals and guiding principles, to define good practices that most DMCs should consider. Diagnostic tools can help DMCs monitor their governance reforms.

As noted at the outset of this chapter, the application of models evolved elsewhere has historically led to major problems in countries that have very different income levels, implementation capacities, and institutional landscapes. Careful and realistic assessment is needed of the costs and benefits of possible institutional innovations, in light of the characteristics and administrative capacity of the individual country. The Bank can build on recent work of other international organizations, as it pulls together knowledge about good practices and diagnostic tools in this complex area.23

The main efforts at external dissemination of good practice will revolve in 1999 and 2000 around a series of in-country workshops on public expenditure management, civil service/public administration, and local government, eventually covering every DMC in the Asian and Pacific region. The Bank's Strategy and Policy Office is producing manuals and handbooks for these workshops in cooperation with staff of OECD, and with the advice of individual experts from other major international financial institutions and academia. Also, accountability institutions and mechanisms in different countries will be reviewed. Finally, several new technical assistance operations are ongoing or under preparation (Box 11).

(ii) Improved implementation processes for governance reforms: As manuals and diagnostic tools are developed and governments set strategies for organizational development and policy reform, the second priority for medium-term improvement is the processes for carrying out these strategies. The Bank needs better processes for addressing governance concerns in its projects, and for anticipating and dealing with crosscutting governance issues affecting the Bank's project portfolio in each DMC.

Too often the Bank and other development partners invest large sums to design institutional reforms that are not effectively implemented.24 Again, the Bank is fortunate to be able to build on recent work by other organizations.25 The following are the lessons of this work.

  • Governance reforms should take place within the context of a comprehensive vision that is coherent, owned, and public.
  • Reforms should be sequenced in ways that consider underlying political opportunities and constraints.
  • Organizational changes are only likely to take hold if fully understood and supported by the stakeholders concerned. External agents can suggest improvements based on their knowledge of good practice from other countries, but the leadership of the change process should be from those that will have to live with the changes.

One might say that DMCs need to adopt the "Noah Principle" of management: "No more prizes for predicting rain; only prizes for building the ark."26` The difficulty is in finding leverage points that can be empowered to bring about the required changes in practice. Some of the steps needed are as follows.

  • Identify leverage point(s) in each country, which might be a government ministry, parliament, the judiciary, ombudsman's commission, NGO, women's rights group, local government body, or religious organization.
  • Select leverage points based on demonstrated commitment to good governance, and leadership potential for changes that can ripple through government and civil society.
  • Build capabilities of leverage points through advice and proper incentives, including training on strategy and systems, action planning workshops, access to knowledge about best practices, and links to professional networks.

This will be a two-tiered approach. The first tier will be the leverage point. The Bank will proactively seek this out, based on the criteria above. The second tier will be weaker organizations that have not yet demonstrated their commitment and effective contribution to good governance principles. The Bank will directly support the first tier, and use it as a catalyst for change of the second tier. This assumes that commitment in the second tier is best forged by national leverage points, rather than directly by the Bank.

(iii) Tracking evolving notions of good practices: The Asian financial crisis shows that change can be rapid and unpredictable at the dawn of the 21st century. Institutional forms that have worked in the past are being continuously challenged and reinvented. Governments cannot be left behind in this change process. Some of the institutional forms best suited to achieving good governance will be changing. The Bank will be tracking these trends, and advising DMCs on them.

The explosive growth of electronic networks is already facilitating new forms of citizen participation in governance, and new organizational forms. For example, an increasingly common form of business organization is set up around individuals and small businesses linked by the Internet. Tasks are carried out by independent contractors without layers of managers, deadlines, budgets, and other traditional control systems of bureaucratic hierarchies. This emerging organizational form is perhaps best understood from a metaphor.

"When we look up in the sky and see a flock of birds flying in formation, we tend to assume that the bird in front is the leader and is somehow determining the organization of all the other birds. In fact, biologists tell us, each bird is following a simple set of rules-behavioral standards-that result in the emergence of the organization. The bird in front is no more important than a bird at the back or a bird in the middle. They are all equally essential to the pattern that they're forming."27

These and other changes are already encouraging nations to adhere to global standards to compete for trade and investment. Some aspects of sovereignty, such as those related to economic regulation and public accountability, are becoming structured around international instruments. Even though these are normally legally nonbinding, there are still agreed mechanisms for surveillance and compliance.28

No one can predict the speed or the extent to which these changes will alter the face of governance in DMCs. Yet it is necessary to conceive of completely new organizational landscapes where underlying good governance values will not only likely prevail, but also where the way governments carry out their business drastically changes. The Bank will work to keep its governance policies, manuals, and diagnostic tools fully up to date on emerging practices from the region and beyond, and draw from these practices to give DMCs support appropriate to their cultural, historical, and economic situations.

Governance institutions are also changing. Many governments are changing the way they do business, forming partnerships, contractual arrangements, and electronic networks with private businesses, NGOs, and individual citizens to develop public policies and deliver public services. As these trends continue, large, hierarchical government organizations in DMCs may give way to smaller, network-facilitating groups, joining with various partners to carry out particular tasks, all of whom can work together because they follow the agreed "rules of the game."

Box 11. Major Activities for External Dissemination in Core Governance

Public Expenditure Management and Public Administration1

The objective of this regional technical assistance (RETA) is to improve the practice of public administration, with specific emphasis on expenditure management, among Bank members. It supports work in three areas: (i) strengthening public expenditure programming and financial management, (ii) reviewing key aspects of public administration and civil service reform, and (iii) describing the main issues and options for effective local governance. Three sets of outputs are expected: (i) a public expenditure management manual, (ii) a public administration and civil service guidebook, and (iii) a local governance sourcebook. They are to be produced by Bank staff, in collaboration with the ADB Institute and in consultation with top international experts in the respective areas from major international organizations as well as academia. These manuals will be the basis for in-country workshops for upper and middle-level managers in developing member countries, to be conducted in 1999 and 2000, and will eventually cover all countries of the region.

Accountability Mechanisms in the Asian and Pacific Region

While the Bank is already active in strengthening several key accountability institutions such as Supreme Audit Institutions, this RETA will systematically examine the various institutional mechanisms for advancing managerial, legal, and public accountability. Detailed case studies will be compiled, including analysis of several core and line accountability functions, and the agencies or departments that provide them; review of central mechanisms for policy coordination and implementation; and examination of the functioning of key institutions such as anticorruption agencies and ombudsman offices.

A number of governance strategy studies are also being initiated, to serve both as inputs into country strategies and as the basis for constructive interventions suited to the requests and specific characteristics of each country. Studies for the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Viet Nam are under way; those for Cambodia and Thailand will be initiated in early 1999. Finally, the RETA will support a joint ADB/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development seminar on anticorruption, covering both the internal aspects of the issue and the likely contribution from the Anti-Bribery Treaty.

_____________________
  1. RETA 5813: Public Expenditure Management and Public Administration, for $500,000, approved on 27 October 1998.
  2. RETA 5829: Accountability Mechanisms in the Asian and Pacific Region, for $500,000, approved on 31 December 1998. Cumulative Bank lending since the Bank’s inception in 1966 to the end of 1998 amounted to $77.3 billion for 1,500 projects in 37 DMCs.

_____________________
  1. See, for example, World Bank and UNDP, “Special Program of Assistance,” Guiding Principles for Civil Service Reform (Washington, DC and NY, 1995); World Bank and ADB, “Civil Service Discipline and the Budget Structure” (draft, 1999); John M. Cohen and Stephen B. Peterson, “Administrative Decentralization Strategies for the 1990s and Beyond” (NY: United Nations Secretariat, 1995); IMF, Manual on Fiscal Transparency (Washington, DC: IMF, 1998); IFAC, Auditing for Compliance with Authorities: A Public Sector Perspective (New York, NY, 1994); IFAC, Guidelines for Governmental Financial Reporting (exposure draft, 1998); South Pacific Forum Secretariat, UNDP, and Pacific Financial and Technical Assistance Center, “Accountability Stocktake Questionnaire” (Suva, Fiji: South Pacific Forum Secretariat, 1998); Jeremy Pope, National Integrity Systems: The TI Sourcebook (Berlin: Transparency International, 1996); CIET International, Community Voice in Planning in Pakistan: Sentinel Community Surveillance (New York: C ET International ); and CIET International, Nepal Multiple Indicator Surveillance, Second Cycle–Primary Education: Final Report (New York: CIET International, 1996).
  2. See, for example, ADB, Assessment of the Effectiveness of Bank Technical Assistance for Capacity Building to Vanuatu (Manila, 1996); ADB, Assessment of the Effectiveness of Bank Assistance for Capacity Building to Western Samoa (Manila, 1995); and Louise G. White, Implementing Policy Reforms in LDCs (London: Lynne Rienner, 1990).
  3. See, for example, UNDP, Process Consultations: Systemic Improvement of Public Sector Management (New York, NY: UNDP, 1995).
  4. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1997), 245.
  5. Thomas W. Malone and Robert J. Laubacher, “The dawn of the e-lance economy,” Harvard Business Review (1998), 76, 5: 152; see also Murray Weidenbaum and Samuel Hughes, The Bamboo Network: How Expatriate Chinese Entrepreneurs Are Creating a New Economic Superpower in Asia (New York: Martin Kessler Books, 1996); Paul Krugman, The Self-Organizing Economy (Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1996); and Robert J. Laubacher, Thomas W. Malone, and the MIT Scenario Working Group, “Two Scenarios for 21st Century Organizations: Shifting Networks of Small Firms or All-Encompassing Virtual Countries?” (Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1997); and Jessica Lipnack and Jeffrey Stamps, The Age of the Network: Organizing Principles for the 21st Century (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994).
  6. These include, inter alia, standards of international intergovernment organizations such as the World Trade Organization, regional intergovernment organizations such as the South Pacific Forum, and standards of professional bodies such as the International Federation of Accountants. See, for example, Wolfgang H. Reinicke, Global Public Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998).


<<Back
Enhancing the Bank's capcity of governance work
Next>>
Summary and conclusions