Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Catalog

Home : Publications : Catalog : Online Publications : Document

Table of Contents
p. 13 of 77 BACK | NEXT
Foreword, Acknowledgments, Acronyms and Abbreviations, Definitions
I. Developing Asia and the world
Overview of economic highlights and prospects
Export or domestic demand-led growth in developing Asia?
Introduction
Export-led growth strategy
Definition of domestic demand- and export-led growth strategies
>>Demand-side growth-accounting exercise
Decomposition analysis of stances in the private, government, and trade sectors
Comparison of expenditure shares of open European countries and selected countries in the Asia-Pacific region
Summary and conclusions
Endnotes and references
II. Economic trends and prospects in developing Asia
III. Promoting competition for long-term development
Statistical appendix
Asian Development Outlook 2005 : I. Developing Asia and the world

Demand-side growth-accounting exercise

In this section, a growth-accounting analysis on the components of demand is performed. As indicated above, the objective of this exercise is to apportion overall growth between domestic demand and net exports. Technical details are shown in Box 1.4.

Box 1.4 Demand-side growth accounting

Real output from the demand side is given by the national income and product accounts as:

GDP ≡ Y ≡ Cp + Cg + I + X - M       (1)

where GDP stands for gross domestic product, Cp is private consumption, Cg is government consumption, I is gross domestic investments or GDCF, and X and M are exports and imports of goods and services, respectively.

In growth rate terms:

      (2)

where the symbol ˆ denotes growth rate of the variable.

The above simply states that the growth rate of GDP is the sum of the products of the shares in GDP times the growth rates of private consumption, government consumption, gross domestic investments and exports, less the product of the share of imports and its growth rate.

Real values were derived for 1973, 1983, 1993, and 2002 using the United Nations Statistics Division data, which have a continuous series of expenditure component measures from 1973 to 2002 in constant 1990 prices. Data for 2003 were derived from the 2002 data above and the latest growth data from ADB's Key Indicators 2004 or the latest IMF International Financial Statistics. For the Philippines, the United Nations Statistics Division has a complete continuous series from 1973 to 2003. India did not have data for 2003 at the time of writing (December 2004), so its data end in 2002.

Average annual growth rate of a variable, denoted x, was derived, say, for 1973 to 1983, as:

     (3)

For a continuously increasing positive x, the above method will yield a higher annual average growth rate than taking the 10 actual annual growth rates of x from 1973-74 up to 1982-83, and then averaging them.1

The method employed here also uses the GDP estimate without taking into consideration the statistical discrepancy between the value-added GDP estimate and the expenditure GDP estimate. That is, the GDP in the denominators of the shares in equation (2) uses equation (1) exactly without including the statistical discrepancy. This allows the expenditure shares to sum up to exactly 100%, and for equation (2) to sum up exactly to the GDP growth rate.


1 This is because the base year in (3) is always the value of 1973, while averaging the actual annual growth rates uses base years from 1973 up to 1982.

Source: Asian Development Bank staff.

The five countries chosen--PRC, India, Korea, Philippines, and Thailand--provide a relatively wide spectrum of experiences and results. The first two are the oft-touted Asian success stories of the most recent decade due to their opening up to international trade, and the latter three were countries affected by the Asian financial crisis in 1997-98. Table 1.3 gives the shares of the expenditure components of GDP at constant prices for the five countries. Table 1.4 shows the average annual growth rates of GDP and of demand components over the 10-year intervals of 1973-1983, 1983-1993, and 1993-2003. Table 1.5 provides the growth rates of the expenditure components weighted by their shares in GDP. This gives, in growth rate terms, the contribution of each component to the growth rate of GDP. Finally, Table 1.6 displays, as a percentage, the contribution of each aggregate demand component to overall GDP growth.




People's Republic of China

The tables show that the PRC registered high domestic demand growth in the first two decades, 1973-1993, while its net export position deteriorated and was negative.7 This happened even as the growth of exports posted annual averages of more than 20% (since imports increased more than exports). The last decade, 1993-2003, however, saw not only continuing large growth in domestic demand components, but also a strong shift from negative net exports (or trade deficits) to high positive net export (or trade surplus) positions, as export growth accelerated and import growth decelerated. Thus, the PRC's growth experience during the last decade points to high growth in both the domestic demand components and in the net export component. Domestic demand contributed around 90% to the double-digit GDP growth of the PRC in 1993-2003, while net exports contributed around 10% (Table 1.6). It is also important to point out that, in all three decades, investment growth outpaced consumption growth (Table 1.4), so that the last decade saw a larger contribution of investment than consumption to GDP growth, an increase in the share of capital formation (to more than 40%), and a continuing decline of the share of private consumption. It must be emphasized that in the last decade the share of net exports in GDP grew substantially--reflecting the transition from a negative contributor to growth to a high positive contributor.

India

India registered positive average annual GDP growth during the three decades, but lower than the PRC. The first two decades (1973-1993) were marked by growth in domestic demand as net exports deteriorated. During the last decade, when India opened up to the international market, the country exhibited even higher growth, with higher growth in the domestic demand components, but now the trade deficits improved so that net exports contributed slightly to overall GDP growth. During this decade, the growth rates of exports and imports more than doubled, with exports outpacing imports, leading to the decline in the trade deficits (net exports became a smaller negative number). As in the PRC, investment increased more than consumption in the last decade, with the consequence that the share of capital formation increased, while that of private consumption fell. But the high share of consumption still made this component of demand the largest contributor to growth in the last decade. Finally, the last decade saw an increase in the share of net exports to GDP (actually a decline of its negative share to GDP) and a slight decline in the share of domestic demand to GDP.

Korea

The high-growth decade for Korea was 1973-1983, when it started being touted as an "Asian tiger". During this decade, the domestic demand components of GDP grew very fast. Export growth exceeded 20% annually and surpassed import growth such that the country registered net export growth. At the same time, there was strong domestic demand growth. The trade surplus position reversed during 1983-1993 as the country began exhibiting trade deficits in the early 1990s, even if exports continued growing at a very high rate. The very high GDP growth during this decade, therefore, was due to high growth of domestic demand, with net exports deteriorating and turning negative toward the 1990s. Trade deficits continued until the Asian crisis. The last decade, 1993-2003, reversed the trade deficits, and the country returned to positive net exports starting in 1998, at the height of the Asian crisis. Because of the significant contraction of the economy in 1998, the growth rate of the last decade was lower than those registered during the last two decades, though still respectable. The last decade saw a slower growth of consumption and investment than in the previous decades, with investment actually losing share of GDP (reflecting the investment collapse of 1998). Net exports contributed to GDP growth in this last decade, and increased its share in GDP, while the share of domestic demand fell.

Philippines

The Philippines exhibited respectable growth during 1973-1983, with domestic demand growing significantly. The decade 1983-1993 was a difficult period for the Philippines, marked by the economic collapse of 1984-85 and 1991-92. Average annual growth was low during this decade, which saw a decline in investment and low growth in consumption. Trade deficits also worsened, contributing to the low growth. The decade, therefore, was characterized by stagnation, with net exports not improving by the end of the decade (1993). The last decade (1993-2003) saw an improvement in growth rates, but net exports continued to be negative and did not improve in absolute terms, though they did improve as a percentage of GDP. The Philippines, therefore, is the only case among the five countries analyzed where all three periods, including the last one, were marked by growth in domestic demand and deterioration in net exports, although there was an improvement in terms of the share of net exports to GDP (to a smaller negative number).

Thailand

Thailand registered very high growth in the first two decades, 1973-1983 and 1983-1993, with both investment and consumption growing very fast. This was accompanied by deteriorating net exports in the two decades.8 The deterioration of net exports during 1983-1993 was accompanied by spectacular growth rates in both exports and imports. The last decade saw a significant fall in the GDP growth rate, as a consequence of the Asian crisis, which hit Thailand in 1997-98, and resulted in steep GDP and investment declines. Because of this, investment fell during the decade while consumption grew slowly and net exports turned from negative to largely positive. Thailand's GDP growth in 1993-2003 stemmed largely from improvements in net exports, which contributed 71% of the country's overall growth. Thus, Thailand's post-Asian crisis improvement in net exports was the main contributor to growth during the last decade, rather than domestic demand.

Summary of results

Table 1.7 summarizes the results of the growth-accounting exercise. The overall picture that emerges from the analysis of the selected countries indicates that during the first two decades, but more especially during the second, domestic demand was the main driver of growth, as net exports deteriorated. The last decade of 1993-2003, on the other hand, was accompanied by significant improvements in the net exports position of the selected group of countries (with the exception of the Philippines). This is true for countries experiencing continuous growth (PRC and India) and for the countries hit by the Asian crisis (Korea and Thailand). The PRC and India registered high domestic demand growth in the last decade, simultaneously with net export growth (and very high export growth). Korea and Thailand saw net exports swing from negative to highly positive and contribute significantly to growth, as the domestic demand components grew more slowly.

In the Asian tigers such as PRC, Korea, and Thailand, export growth actually decelerated in the last decade relative to the second decade, but export growth was still in double digits. On the other hand, the growth rate of imports decelerated more with the consequence that all three countries saw improvements in their net export positions.

Export growth accelerated very strongly in India during the last decade, much more than imports, leading to the reduction in the country's trade deficit. The Philippines had the slowest growth in exports in the last decade, and was the only country with deteriorating net exports.

The net export share to GDP improved in all five countries. Even countries with negative net exports (or trade deficits) improved their positions. India was able to reduce its trade deficit in terms of magnitude. Trade deficits increased in magnitude in the Philippines, but declined in terms of the share in GDP. Tables 1.3 and 1.6 show that the share of domestic demand and its contribution to growth decreased during the last decade. Conversely, the share of net exports and its contribution to growth increased.

The conclusion is that there is no evidence that the net export position of the selected countries deteriorated during the last decade. And as a consequence, there is no evidence that growth during the last decade was domestic demand-led and at the expense of the net export position.



<<Back
Definition of domestic demand- and export-led growth strategies
Next>>
Decomposition analysis of stances in the private, government, and trade sectors

© 2009 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page