Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Catalog

Home : Publications : Catalog : Online Publications : Document

Table of Contents
p. 76 of 77 BACK | NEXT
Foreword, Acknowledgments, Contents, Acronyms and Abbreviations, Definitions
I. Developing Asia and the World
II. Economic trends and prospects in developing Asia
III. Routes for Asia's Trade
Introduction
The drivers of trade and integration in Asia
The rise of bilateralism
Trade scenarios: Potential benefits and risks
An agenda for trade and integration in Asia
Conclusions
>> Endnotes and references
Statistical appendix
Asian Development Outlook 2006 : III. Routes for Asia's Trade

Endnotes

1 The analysis here builds on and extends Part 3 of ADB (2002a). A particularly significant development since then has been the rise of bilateral free trade agreements.

2 Hubs are usually large countries that are the center of preferential trading regions such as the United States in the western hemisphere and the European Union in Europe and the Mediterranean rim. Spokes are smaller, often developing, countries that opt to join the hub through an FTA. Whereas hubs automatically have preferential access to all the spokes in the system, the converse is not always true. Spokes may be linked to one another through their own FTAs. However, rules of origin may inhibit trade between the spokes. One solution to this problem is for hubs to allow "diagonal cumulation" (as in the Euro-Med Free Trade Agreement rules of origin) so that content from several spokes can count cumulatively toward the originating value added and will help make products eligible for duty-free treatment in the hub (Cadot et al. 2006).

3 Kawai (2005) reports East Asia (comprising members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, PRC, newly industrialized economies of Hong Kong, China; Korea; Singapore; and Taipei,China) having an intraregional trade share of 44%. However, if South Asia is included, this share will fall somewhat.

4 For example, see Rose (2004). Rose uses a standard gravity model and finds little evidence that trade patterns of members of the GATT/WTO system differ from those of outsiders once standard variables have been taken into account. He concludes that if GATT/WTO membership does not account for the fact that trade growth has led income growth in the post-Second World War era, membership in regional trade agreements (e.g., EU, NAFTA) may be an alternative explanation. That East Asian countries attained even more rapid growth in trade than other regions of the world without resort to discriminatory trade preferences for several decades would appear to contradict such a conclusion.

5 The program was largely successful as it reduced Indonesia's simple average import tariff from 20% in 1994 to about 7% by the end date. See James (2005a).

6 Data from Athukorala and Yamashita (2005) show increase from 66% to 70% between 1992 and 2003.

7 Compliance costs fall typically in the range of 3—5% of the cost, insurance, freight import price and these costs (arising from paperwork and documentation procedures in customs and ports) discourage firms from applying for tariff preferences (Productivity Commission 2003).

8 This is in fact why Sutherland et al. (2004) recommended that the deepest possible cuts be made in MFN tariffs in the Doha Round negotiations—as the only practical way to undo the "spaghetti bowl" problem in the context of proliferation of discriminatory trade agreements.

9 For an earlier version of GEMAT, with an assumption of constant returns to scale and perfect competition, see Roland-Holst et al. (2005).

10 The calculation here does not take into account the recent revision of GDP statistics in the PRC, which raises the GDP figure of 2004 by 16.8%.

11 Technically, the changes in real income are measured as Hicksian equivalent variation, which represents a money metric of welfare change. It is defined as the amount of income that, if given to the consumers at baseline prices, would be equivalent in terms of their level of utility to the effects of policy changes.

12 They estimate gains of 0.7% of world GDP by 2015 but their scenario assumptions imply quicker liberalization than those used here. The coarser regional disaggregation for the non-Asia region in GEMAT also partly accounts for the smaller estimate of global gains.

13 Rules of origin are not captured in GEMAT.

14 In the global trade liberalization scenario, India suffers a terms-of-trade deterioration.

15 Baldwin cautions that, to avoid the possibility of transnational protectionist alliances, the exclusion of sectors from FTAs should be considered case by case. Agreements to exclude them on a consistent basis risk creating strong constituencies in favor of protectionism.

References

Anderson, James E., and Eric van Wincoop. 2004. "Trade Costs." Journal of Economic Literature 42(3):691-751.

Anderson, Kym, Will Martin, and Dominique van der Mensbrugghe. 2006. Doha Merchandise Trade Reform: What's at Stake for Developing Countries? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3848. February. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Asian Development Bank. 1997. Emerging Asia: Changes and Challenges. Manila.

---. 2002a. Asian Development Outlook. Part 3. "Preferential trade Agreements in Asia and the Pacific." Manila.

---. 2002b. Empowering Nations Through Regional Cooperation. Theme Paper No. 10. Reprinted from Asian Development Bank Annual Report 2001:14-28. Manila.

---. 2003. "Technical Assistance of the People's Republic of Bangladesh for Preparing the Chittagong Port Trade Facilitation Project." TAR:BAN 36105. July.

---. Forthcoming. Central Asia: Increasing Gains from Trade Through Regional Cooperation in Trade Policy, Transport, and Customs Transit. Manila.

Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation. 2002. "The Benefits of Trade and Investment Liberalization and Facilitation in APEC." APEC Economic Committee. Bangkok.

Athukorala, Prema-chandra and Nobuaki Yamashita. 2005. Production fragmentation and trade integration: East Asia in a global context. Working Paper in Trade and Development no. 2005/07. Canberra: Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.

Baldwin, Richard E. 2002. "Asian Regionalism: Promises and Pitfalls." Paper presented at the Korea Institute for International Economic Policy Conference on Prospects for Economic Cooperation in East Asia. Seoul. 27 September.

Baldwin, Richard E. and Anthony J. Venables. 1995. "Regional Economic Integration." In Gene M. Grossman and Kenneth Rogoff, eds. Handbook of International Economics, Vol. III. Amsterdam: North-Holland, section 1.2.

Barboza, David. 2006. "Made in China labels don't tell whole story." The New York Times and International Herald Tribune. 9 February.

Berg, Andrew and Anne O. Krueger. 2003. Trade, Growth, and Poverty: A Selective Survey. IMF Working Paper No. 03/30. February. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

Cadot, Olivier, Antoni Estevadeoral, Akiko Suwa, and Thierry Verdier. 2006. The Origin of Goods: Rules of Origin in Regional Trade Agreements. London: Oxford University Press.

Caves, Richard E. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dimaranan, Betina V. and Robert A. McDougall, eds. 2006. Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 6 Data Base. West Lafayette, Indianapolis: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.

Dobson, Wendy and Chia Siow Yue, eds. 1997. Multinationals and East Asian Integration. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

Dollar, David. 1992. "Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976-1985." Economic Development and Cultural Change 40(3):523-44.

Economist, The. 2004. "Free Trade in South-East Asia." July 29.

Edwards, Sebastian. 1998. "Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?" Economic Journal 108(2, March):383-98.

Engman, Michael. 2005. The Economic Impact of Trade Facilitation. OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 21. October. Paris: OECD Trade Directorate.

Francois, Joseph, Hans van Meijl, and Frank van Tongeren. 2005. "Trade Liberalization in the Doha Development Round." Economic Policy 20(42):349-91.

Frankel, Jeffrey. 1998. The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Fukao, Kyoji, Hikari Ishido, and Keiko Ito. 2003. "Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia." Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 17(4):468-506.

Hertel, Thomas W., Terrie L. Walmsley, and Ken Itakura. 2001. "Dynamic effects of the new age free trade agreements between Japan and Singapore." Journal of Economic Integration 16(4, December):446-84.

Hill, Hal. 1988. Foreign Investment and Industrialisation in Indonesia. Singapore: Oxford University Press.

Hummels, David. 2001. Time as a Trade Barrier. West Lafayette, Indianapolis: Purdue University Economics Department.

International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development (ICSEAD). 2006. "Recent Trends and Prospects for Major Asian Economies." East Asian Economic Perspectives Special Issue 17(1, February).

International Monetary Fund. Balance of Payments Statistics. 1990-2004 Yearbooks and December 2005 CD-ROM, Washington, DC.

---. 2006. Direction of Trade Statistics. February.

James, William E. 2000. "The Rise of Antidumping and Regionalism: An East Asian Perspective." Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 14(2):13-26.

---. 2005a. "Trade Policy, the World Trading System and the Competitiveness of Indonesian Non-Oil Products: Toward a Strategy for the 21st Century." Paper presented at the University of Gadjah Mada 50th Anniversary Conference. Yogjakarta. October.

---. 2005b. "Rules of Origin and Rules of Preference and the World Trade Organization: the Challenge to Global Trade Liberalization." Vol. 2 of P. Macrory, A. Applegate, and M. Plummer (eds.). The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Perspectives (3 Volumes). New York: Springer.

James, William E. and Eric D. Ramstetter. 2005. Trade, Foreign Firms and Economic Policy in Indonesian and Thai Manufacturing. ICSEAD Working Paper Series No. 05-01, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Kawai, Masahiro. 2005. "East Asian economic regionalism: progress and challenges." Journal of Asian Economics 16(1):29-55.

Kojima, Kiyoshi. 1990. Japanese Direct Investment Abroad. International Christian University. Social Science Research Institute Monograph Series 1. Mitaka, Tokyo.

Maddison, Angus. 1995. Monitoring the World Economy 1820-1922. Paris: OECD Development Studies Centre.

Ng, Francis and Alexander Yeats. 1999. Production Sharing in East Asia: Who Does What for Whom and Why? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 2197. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

Ngoc, Phan Minh and Eric D. Ramstetter. 2004. Foreign Ownership Shares and Exports of Multinational Firms in Vietnamese Manufacturing. ICSEAD Working Paper Series No. 04-32, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2003. Quantitative Assessment of the Benefits of Trade Facilitation. TD/TC/WP(2003)31/FINAL. Paris.

Petri, Peter A. 2006. "Is East Asia Becoming More Interdependent?" Paper presented at the American Economic Association and American Committee for Asian Economic Studies. Boston. January 8.

Plummer, Michael G. 2005. "Toward Win-Win Regionalism in Asia: Issues and Challenges in Forming Efficient Trade Agreements in Asia." Paper prepared for the Asian Development Bank. Manila. November.

Productivity Commission. 2003. Rules of Origin under the Australia-New Zealand CER Trade Agreement. Interim Research Report. Canberra.

Puga, Diego and Anthony Venables. 1997. "Preferential Trading Arrangements and Industrial Location." Journal of International Economics 43(3-4):347-68.

Ramstetter, Eric D. 1999. "Comparisons of Foreign Multinationals and Local Firms in Asian Manufacturing over Time." Asian Economic Journal 123(2):163-203.

Rodriguez, Francisco and Dani Rodrik. 2001. "Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-national Evidence." In B. Bernanke and K.S. Rogoff, eds. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000 261-324. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Rodrik, Dani. 1999. Making Openness Work: The New Global Economy and Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council.

Roland-Holst, David, Jean-Pierre Verbiest, and Fan Zhai. 2005. "Growth and Trade Horizons for Asia: Long-term Forecasts for Regional Integration." Asian Development Review 22(2):108-125.

Rose, Andrew K. 2004. "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?" American Economic Review 94(1, March):98-114.

Sachs, Jeffrey D. and Andrew M. Warner. 1995. "Economic reform and the process of global integration." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:1-118.

Sutherland, Peter, Jagdish Bhagwati, Kwesi Botchwey, Niall FitzGerald, Koichi Hamada, John H. Jackson, Celso Lafer, and Thierry de Montbrial. 2004. The Future of the WTO: Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium. Report by the Consultative Board to the Director-General Supachai Panitchpakdi. Geneva: World Trade Organization.

Thee, Kian Wie. 1991. "The Surge of Asian NIC Investment into Indonesia." Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 27(3, December):55-60.

---. 2003. "Export-oriented Industrialization and Foreign Direct Investment in the ASEAN Countries." In M. Nissanke (ed.), Asia and Africa in the World Economy. Tokyo: United Nations University. September.

United Nations Development Programme. 2005. The Great Maze: Regional and Bilateral Free Trade Agreements in Asia. Colombo.

van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique. 2005. LINKAGE Technical Reference Document. Economic Policy and Prospects Group, The World Bank, Washington DC. Processed. Available: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPROSPECTS/Resources/334934-1100792545130/LinkageTechNote.pdf.

Vermulst, Edwin and Paul Waer. 1990. "European Community Rules of Origin as Commercial Policy Instruments." Journal of World Trade 24(3, June):55-100.

Winters, L. Alan. 2004. "Trade Liberalisation and Economic Performance: An Overview." The Economic Journal 114(493, February):F4-F21.

World Bank. 2000. World Business Environment Survey (WBES) 2000 Webtool Interactive. Available: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wbes/.

Zhai, Fan. 2005. "Preferential Trade Agreements in Asia: Alternative Scenarios of Hub and Spoke." Paper prepared for the Experts' Meeting on Long-term Scenarios of Asia's Growth and Trade. Asian Development Bank. Manila. 10—11 November.



<<Back
Conclusions
Next>>
Statistical appendix

© 2009 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page