Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Evaluation

Home : Topics : Evaluation : About Evaluation : Attributes of Independence

About Evaluation
Attributes of Independence
Strategic Principles for Evaluations
Directions in Evaluation
Work Program
Portfolio Performance
Methods and Guidelines
Perceptions of OED
Evaluation Resources
Ongoing Evaluations
Evaluation Capacity Development
Harmonization Work
Evaluation Chats
Linking to Results
Events
Contact Us


Attributes of Independence

The Operations Evaluation Department became independent [ PDF: 151 kb | 15 pages ] in January 2004. It now reports to the Board of Directors' Development Effectiveness Committee. The Board appoints OED's Director General upon the recommendation of the DEC and the President.

With OED's independence, the role of ADB's Management changed from approving evaluation reports to responding to their findings and recommendations. ADB Management's responses and the DEC Chair's Summaries of Discussions are appended to evaluation reports and disclosed as they become available.

To avoid conflict of interest [ PDF: 32 kb | 3 pages ], OED evaluators and management exclude themselves from evaluating or approving a report on any project/program/activity/entity that they worked on, appraised, or had decision-making or approval responsibility for in a previous capacity, or when they expect to have such involvement in the future. Similar care is also taken in the selection of consultants.

The Development Effectiveness Committee

The DEC was established by ADB's Board of Directors in December 2000 and initiated activities on behalf of the Board in 2001. It consists of not more than six members of the Board, who meet about 12 times a year. Its general mandate is to assist the Board to carry out its responsibility of ensuring that the programs and activities of ADB achieve development effectiveness. Such development effectiveness is assessed through ADB's operations evaluation. For the purpose of the DEC's work, "development effectiveness" is the measure of (i) whether ADB's programs and activities in furtherance of its policy goals and objectives have resulted in the desired outcomes, and (ii) whether these programs and activities have made efficient use of ADB's available resources. The DEC

  • reviews the work program of OED;
  • reviews selected evaluation reports and the actions taken by ADB on them;
  • reports to the Board on high-priority operations evaluation issues, if any, that have a significant bearing on the relevance, efficiency, and effectiveness of ADB, and makes recommendations on such issues to the Board;
  • monitors and reports to the Board on the implementation of decisions;
  • reviews OED's work program for preparation of project, program, and technical assistance completion reports; and
  • reviews the Annual Evaluation Review and the Annual Report on Loan and Technical Assistance Portfolio Performance.

The DEC's evolving key areas of concern are the following:

  • How are the evaluation recommendations that ADB's Management decides to accept turned into action so that targeted changes for improvement happen?
  • How are actions and their impacts monitored?
  • How can OED play a more strategic role? Specifically, how can the influence of independent evaluations on ADB's long-term strategic thinking be increased?
  • How can the DEC play a more strategic role and increase the value it adds to ADB's learning process?

The specific steps that the DEC has taken to support OED include

  • suggesting topics of strategic interest for inclusion in OED's work program,
  • helping to get the timing right for policy studies,
  • ensuring that country assistance program evaluations are discussed by the DEC before country partnership strategies are finalized, and
  • initiating measures to strengthen ADB Management responses.

Next: Strategic Principles for Evaluations