 |  |
Evaluation Capacity Development
Pilot Implementation of the Project Performance Management System in
the Philippines
| Number: |
TA 2782-PHI |
| Approval: |
16 April 1997 |
| Amount: |
$250,000 |
| Closure: |
May 1998 |
| Performance: |
Partly Successful |
| Details: |
TA Report
TA Completion Report
|
Lessons Identified
- A partial/piecemeal donor approach to implementing changes in national
monitoring and evaluation (M&E) process will not be effective unless it is done in a broad M&E
agenda/framework and sustained by institutional and leadership support at
all levels of participating agencies.
- The exercise should have been less donor-driven and with stronger local
initiative.
- The National Economic Development Authority of the Government should take a lead role in providing direction, training, and on-the-job
assistance and follow up to implement and replicate the project performance management system/results monitoring and evaluation approach
to projects in other departments.
- Manpower training must be institutionalized in order to develop and maintain
the necessary depth of understanding and competence in M&E concepts.
- A project should be designed using the log frame.
- A project should not be approved for funding until the objectives, indicators,
and targets have been clearly defined and a M&E system established.
- Funding for M&E should be anticipated and included in the project
budget.
- It is difficult to undertake retrofitting of log frames for existing
projects.
|