| A. Improved Support for DMC Capacity on Managing for
Development Results |
| A1. ADB support for country capacity building on MfDR better
targeted, coordinated, and more effectively delivered |
Indicator 11 of Paris Declaration (increase in the number
of DMCs with monitorable results frameworks from 2006)
% of MfDR TA projects rated satisfactory in TCRs (at least 75%)
DMCs' applying the knowledge gained from CoP-MfDR (at least 80%) |
A more strategic, coordinated approach to capacity building in DMCs
designed and implemented, and adequate financial resources available to
sustain ADB's MfDR capacity building program in DMCs |
2009 (approach developed);
2010-2011 (approach implemented) |
SPRU (RDs, OCO) |
| Asian CoP-MfDR operations reviewed and the recommendations implemented
|
2010 |
SPRU (RDs) |
| B. Increased ADB's Results Orientation in Managing
Operations and Organization |
| B1. Improved results orientation in designing, monitoring,
and evaluating CPSs and country programs |
Overall quality-at-entry (QAE) rating of CPS results framework
and performance indicators (improvement from 2008 QAE rating) % of CPSs
for which a results monitoring plan has been prepared during processing
(100% of CPSs endorsed) % of CPRMs that report progress on country results
(100% of CPRMs conducted) Number of new country briefs completed (increase
from two prototypes) |
Improved approaches and tools for country result monitoring, evaluation,
and management. Possible changes to CPS processes, formats, guidelines,
and relevant project administration instructions. |
QI 2010 |
SPRU (RDs, COSO) |
| Selected output indicators in the ADB corporate results framework systematically
integrated in country and sector results monitoring |
QIV 2009 (guidelines issued) |
SPRU (RDs, RSDD, COSO, sector committees) |
| Country development effectiveness briefs (country briefs) guidelines and
prototypes completed |
QIV 2009 |
Working group on country briefs |
| Country briefs prepared for selected DMCs and disseminated |
Starting 2010 |
RDs (DER, SPRU) |
| Actions to improve staff incentives at field level for CPS M&E reviewed
|
QIV 2009 |
SPRU (BPHR) |
| B2. Improved results focus in project design, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation |
QAE rating of DMFs of projects and TA (improvement from 2008
QAE rating) % of PCRs and TCRs rated satisfactory (improvement from average
level in 2006-2008) |
Improved project quality assurance mechanisms within operations departments.
Good practices and a checklist on quality-at-entry of projects recommended
by PPMS working group for adoption by departments. |
2009
|
COSO (RDs) |
| Guidelines issued on the alignment of project DMF with the ADB corporate
results framework (selected sector output indicators) |
QIV 2009
|
SPRU and COSO in coordination with P3M working group |
| Increased number of ADB and executing agency staff trained on project
implementation planning. At least 85% of staff in RDs, PSOD, and resident
missions trained to develop sound and monitorable DMFs and to monitor project
implementation. |
2009, 2010, 2011
|
COSO (RDs, PSOD) |
| P3M project becomes operational |
QIV 2009
|
P3M working group |
| B3. Institutionalized results-based management in ADB |
Staff perception ratings on leadership, change management,
culture, systems and processes, and human resource practices (improvement
from results of IED 2007 survey) DEfR findings used as inputs to Work Program
and Budget Framework (WPBF) starting in 2009 (clear linkages based on qualitative
assessment) |
ADB management and senior staff regularly monitor and evaluate results
performance and decide on actions |
Continuous |
Management, SPD/SPRU, RDs, BPMSD |
| Results dashboard developed and accessible to management and staff, and
maintained |
QIII 2009 (dashboard launched); Continuous (dashboard maintained)
|
SPRU (RDs, OIST)
|
| DEfR findings and actions reflected in ADB WPBF |
Every year
|
BPMSD and SPD
|
| Staff performance metrics aligned with the corporate results framework
|
QIV 2009
|
BPHR and SPRU |
ADB corporate results management system refined continuously, based on
experience and good practices
|
Continuous
|
SPRU |
| The system and its effectiveness independently reviewed by IED |
2011 |
IED |
B4. Improved
awareness and
increased staff skills
on MfDR
|
Staff perception ratings on awareness on MfDR (improvement
from results of IED 2007 survey)
Post-training feedback from BPHR
(satisfactory or better) |
Communication plan for MfDR developed and implemented |
QIV 2009 (plan
developed);
2010-2011
(plan implemented)
|
SPRU (RDs, DER) |
MfDR Curriculum updated
|
Continuous |
SPRU (BPHR) |
| C. Effective Partnerships in Global and Regional Forums
on MfDR |
C1. Sustained ADB
collaboration with
development
partners for MfDR
knowledge sharing
|
Contributions by ADB and the Asian
CoP-MfDR members consistently
reflected in global and regional
initiatives (based on qualitative
assessment)
|
ADB and Asian CoP-MfDR members participate in regional and global partnership
initiatives |
Continuous |
SPRU (RDs, IED) |
Contribution to OECD-DAC Cluster E on MfDR and MDB Working Group on MfDR,
including contribution to COMPAS
|
Continuous |
SPRU (RDs, IED,
PSOD, COSO,
SPPI) |
| MfDR publications produced and/or posted on the web (at least 15 per year)
|
Continuous |
SPRU (RDs, DER) |
Topics 
Top of page