Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Database and Development Indicators

Home : Economics and Statistics : Database and Development Indicators : Technical Assistance : Improving the Statistical Methodology of the National Institute of State Statistics and Information

Key Indicators
Millennium Development Goals Statistical Tables
Poverty and Development Indicators
International Comparison Program
Environment Statistics
Technical Assistance


Turkmenistan
Improving the Statistical Methodology of the National Institute of State Statistics and Information
(October 2002 - March 2004)


Issues

Until its independence in 1991, Turkmenistan benefited from economic and social development achieved under the former Soviet Union. Although living standards in general were not high, satisfaction of basic needs and access to social services attained high levels. From the collapse of the Soviet system in 1991 until 1998, the country experienced sharp economic decline. The Government however attempted to ensure satisfactory living standards for the population by maintaining high subsidies on basic goods and services. The economy started to recover in 1998, due to stronger production of cotton, wheat, gas, and oil.

Comprehensive and nationally representative data on the standards of living in Turkmenistan became available for the first time following the Turkmen living standards survey (TLSS), implemented by TMH in 1998 with the assistance of the World Bank. Since the 1998 TLSS was conducted, significant structural changes have occurred in the economy of Turkmenistan. The existing sources of data, although supplying useful information, do not provide a comprehensive and updated profile of the standards of living in Turkmenistan. To assess the effects of the recent structural changes on the household's standards of living, a new living standards survey must be implemented.

Important points to be considered when implementing the second TLSS are the need to ensure comparability with the 1998 survey, and to generate data at subnational levels. Ideally, the data collection should be undertaken from February to April 2003, to ensure full comparability with the 1998 TLSS. In addition to data on households' income and expenditure, the survey will have to provide relevant information on access to, use of, and satisfaction with social services. Turkmenistan maintains high levels of subsidies for basic goods and social services (free water, gas, electricity, education and health, and almost free fuel and public transportation). These subsidies will have to be properly accounted for in the assessment of the standards of living.

The new TLSS will provide the necessary updated and comprehensive profile of the conditions of living in Turkmenistan. However, due to its complexity, relatively high cost, and low frequency of implementation (once every 5 years), this survey is not an appropriate tool for subsequent regular monitoring of living standards. A workable monitoring system—with data provided on an annual basis—must be based on lighter and cost-effective surveys. Since 1935, TMH has been conducting the FBS on a monthly basis. This survey, inherited from the Soviet system, collects data on households' income and expenditure on a rotating sample of 1,350 households. Such a huge effort of data collection could generate useful statistical information for monitoring the standards of living of the population. However, the use of these data is currently limited, and much of the information collected is not analyzed.

Based on TMH's own assessment, FBS data is not fully reliable. A preoccupying problem is the high rate of nonresponse (most better-off households refuse to participate in the survey, causing a bias in the data). Thus, the survey is of limited use for monitoring the standards of living. To make it more useful and relevant, the sampling methodology and survey questionnaire must be assessed, and the bias resulting from the rich households' lack of cooperation must be properly measured. Although the TA will not support the regular implementation of the FBS, it will provide advice and recommendations on its possible enhancement.

During implementation of the TA, particular attention will have to be paid to strengthening the capacity of TMH in the specific areas where expertise is lacking. Strong capacity already exists in data collection. Capacity building will concentrate on developing additional expertise in sampling techniques, data processing, and statistical analysis.

Top

Purpose and Outputs

The goal of the TA is to provide policy makers with relevant and updated data, by strengthening the capacity of TMH to generate reliable data and analytical reports on the standards of living of the country's population. The two specific objectives will be as follows. The first objective is to conduct a second TLSS in 2003 for producing an updated comprehensive assessment of the standards of living in the country. The production and dissemination of an updated socioeconomic profile of the households by TMH is a key output expected from this activity. The second objective is to advise TMH on the possible use of the FBS for monitoring standards of living, based on an in-depth assessment of the sampling methodology and questionnaire design. The output of this activity will be a set of technical recommendations, with an estimate of the cost of their possible subsequent implementation by TMH.

Top

Contact

For more information, you may contact the TA officer:

Mr. Olivier Dupriez, Poverty Statistician
odupriez@adb.org

Top