Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Water

Home : Topics : Water : Knowledge Center : Articles

News and Events
ADB's Water Policy
Water Financing Program
Water Operations
Funding Facilities
Water Champions
Country Water Actions
Knowledge Center
Articles
Books and Reports
Briefs
CD-ROMs
DVDs/Documentaries
E-Newsletter
Evaluation Studies on Water
Links
Multimedia Products
Project Terms of Reference
Photo Essays
Public Service Ads
Water Sector Roadmaps
Speeches
Statistics
Contact Us


How Water Utilities Can Strengthen Themselves
September 2008

By Hubert Jenny
Senior Urban Development Specialist, ADB

Many a water utility has been overwhelmed by the prospect of developing a capacity building and institutional strengthening program (CBISP). Where do they start? Which aspects are negotiable and which ones aren't?


INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING: WHY GO FOR IT

An effective CBISP for a water utility requires not just improving technical operations but the complete improvement of the entire company. At its most fundamental level, it should enable the utility to

  • develop full autonomy within the organizational structure
  • define managerial responsibility and accountability
  • implement integrated business, operation, and financial planning
  • achieve financial self-sufficiency
  • manage competitive human resources.

Top

CBISP: WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE

An effective CBISP should review, define, and implement the following functionally-linked activities:

Business Planning. This includes the writing of the Company Charter, and the Mission and Vision statements. The Business Plan assigns responsibility by functional areas and serves as the basis for measuring performance. At its core is the Budget, which provides the basis for evaluating and reporting spending performance through the Financial Information System (FIS). Sound budgeting information is a prerequisite for water tariff development.

Human Resources Development (HRD). An intrinsic part of the CBISP, this includes the comprehensive review of the organization's management to gauge where changes can and will improve business performance. It also means assessing HRD practices in terms of needs and opportunities for improvements, and developing HRD plans and work schedules to achieve the identified improvements. Finally, this aspect of the CBISP calls for developing and conducting workshops and other training initiatives based on the identified priority needs of the management and staff.

Information Technology (IT). An overall IT strategic plan should assess and implement hardware, software, and staffing requirements to meet targeted Management, Geographic, and Financial Information Systems developments. The IT function should advise on the selection and procurement of specific computer hardware and software.

Management Information Systems (MIS). The MIS should tie together all the management activities into a computer-based information system. It should enhance management decision-making processes by grounding them on reliable financial and technical information, and improve the operating efficiency and performance of the water company.

The Financial part of the MIS (or FIS) involves:

  • installing computer accounting systems and local area networks
  • computerizing the budgeting, billing, and collection systems
  • developing annual financial projection models, based on computerized water demand forecasting models
  • measuring customer response to price increases and complains from the service.

The HRD part of the MIS includes the design of an improved human resources database that includes staff employment and earning history, staff skills inventory, training achievement and aspirations, and job descriptions for each position.

The Operation part of the MIS

  • details water demand and supply analysis
  • reviews water monitoring systems
  • guides decision-making processes for nonrevenue (NRW) water reduction, and planning and control of inventories.

Financial Management Development (FMD). FMD should assist in developing a fully-computerized FIS and a modern budgeting system that capture responsibility and performance by function and activity. It should

  • prepare a manual of policies, procedures, and financial regulations for selected activities
  • review billing and collection system and recommend improvements
  • conduct a financial training program for different levels of staff.

Financial Modeling and Tariff Development. A financial model that works interactively with the Budget to find an acceptable spending and tariff combination should be developed. After all, a water company should live within its means. The financial model defines the tariff requirements each year to meet the revenue requirements It should be seen as a planning tool to achieve full financial self-sufficiency and is dependent on

  • accurate water demand forecasts by customer group to define sales revenues
  • accurate and high level of collections from billings
  • accurate historical and projected level of spending for operations and capital
  • regulatory support of required spending and tariff levels.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS). A mapping and geographic system to support improved network operations and broad-based MIS should be developed. The GIS should be compatible with other GIS available in the city/province and needs to be integrated into the water company's daily operations.

Top

CBISP: HOW THINGS CAN BE DONE

The conventional approach to developing CBISP is to have a consultant assess the water company's status, and then have him meet with the water utility and its financier to design a program for the next 6-12 months. The consultant usually applies Problem Tree or SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) Analysis for the review phase.

While this may work in several instances, the downside of such an approach is that the usually expensive international consultants work in isolation from the client. As such, they produce a "best practices" report that does not have much client ownership. In many cases, the programs ensuing from such an approach are doomed from the start.

To enhance this conventional approach, utilities can start working on a business plan guided by the standards set by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). A business plan makes sense since a water utility is primarily a business entity and should be assessed as such. General standards, such as ISO9001/9002 (Quality) and ISO14000/18000 (Environmental Management and Safety), would help ensure a baseline through benchmarking. They can also guide the water company in formulating an action plan to achieve such standards.

A new set of standards specific to the water industry can provide the right guidance for a water company wishing to strengthen its capacity. These standards are oriented towards performance values and are in line with social responsibility and corporate behavior. They include

  • ISO 24510: Guidelines for the improvement and assessment of the service to users
  • ISO 24511: Guidelines for the management of wastewater utilities and assessment
  • ISO 24512: Guidelines for the management of drinking water utilities and assessment of drinking water services

Top

KEY SUCCESS FACTORS: LEADERSHIP, GOVERNANCE AND TIME

Institutional strengthening is all about accepting changes, and these changes do not happen overnight. Strengthening an institution requires a strong leadership that can drive a top–down transformation process. Too, in order to be able to put all problems and issues on the table and behave in a transparent manner, good governance is a must. Should any of these key success factors be absent or weak, capacity building efforts will have a more than usual uphill battle.


Top