- Key Facts
- Board of Governors
- Board of Directors
- Departments and Offices
- Policies and Strategies
- Annual Meetings
- Independent Evaluation
- News & Events
- Data & Research
- Industry and Trade
- Information and Communication Technology
- Public Sector Management
- Social Protection
- Capacity Development
- Climate Change
- Environmental Sustainability
- Gender and Development
- Poverty Reduction
- Private Sector Development
- Regional Cooperation and Integration
- Social Development
- Urban Development
- Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA)
- Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC)
- Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS)
- Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT)
- South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC)
- European Representative Office
- Japanese Representative Office
- North American Representative Office
- Pacific Liaison and Coordination Office
- Pacific Subregional Office
Countries with Operations
- China, People's Republic of
- Cook Islands
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Lao PDR
- Marshall Islands
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Papua New Guinea
Capacity Development Assistance to Lao PDR
Capacity development; Evaluation
|Series:||Special Evaluation Studies|
This evaluation assessed the effectiveness of different capacity development (CD) approaches to identify factors that influenced the outcome of assistance and recommend improvements for future operations. The study included loan and technical assistance (TA) projects in the agriculture, power, road transport, urban development, and water supply and sanitation sectors approved between 1990 and mid-2003.
Summary of findings
While the different approaches used in each sector appeared relevant and effective in their context, the overall impact of CD assistance was scattered.
The high level of continuing CD assistance and the self-assessments of current strengths and weakness (undertaken as part of the evaluation) indicated that local organizations were not yet sufficiently developed to function without external assistance. Areas in which capacities were developed had not been well documented, which impeded efforts to draw systematic lessons from the experience.
Weak results can be explained as follows:
Human resource weaknesses, staffing and remuneration policies and practices, and financial constraints on the part of the Lao PDR seriously affect the way in which CD assistance is perceived and used (mostly as capacity substitution).
Weak diagnostics meant that no clear understanding existed of the problems that needed to be addressed, nor was consensus and ownership built around the suggested solutions. The design of CD assistance suffered as a consequence: objectives were not articulated well and anticipated outcomes not specified. As a result, implementation focused on delivering inputs and carrying out activities, often using project inputs to substitute for local resources rather than developing capacities.
CD is often equated with training or provision of consultants' services. The lack of a framework, which recognizes CD needs in the operating environment of organizations and for organizational development, affected the approach and results that CD assistance has had. Individual CD activities were scattered rather than systematically structured and sequenced, which affected the extent to which ADB assistance had an impact on capacities for sector and public resource management. Fundamental issues of public sector management, including human resource development and financial management, were not addressed.
The evaluation suggested ADB to take a systematic approach to reviewing its approach to CD assistance.
A working group on CD was created at the time the report was finalized and this has taken up a number of recommendations made in the evaluation. Specifically, the working group determined a definition and framework for CD assistance, and defined approaches and tools for putting these into practice.
For the Lao PDR, a number of recommendations were made to address systemic issues in the areas of financial and human resource management, review and adjust policies on the purpose of CD assistance (moving away from using it for capacity substitution), increase participation in diagnostic and design phases to increase ownership and commitment, and recognize the need for building service delivery capacities rather than focusing on project implementation alone.
- Executive Summary
- I. Background
- II. The Capacity Development Process
- III. Capacity Development Results
- IV. Conclusions
- Supplementary Appendixes