- Key Facts
- Board of Governors
- Board of Directors
- Departments and Offices
- Policies and Strategies
- Annual Meetings
- Independent Evaluation
- Public Sector (Sovereign) Financing
- Private Sector (Nonsovereign) Financing
- Funds and Resources
- Asian Development Fund
- Investor Information
- Business Opportunities
- Consulting Services
- ADB-Japan Scholarship Program
- News & Events
- Data & Research
- Industry and Trade
- Information and Communication Technology
- Public Sector Management
- Social Protection
- Capacity Development
- Climate Change
- Environmental Sustainability
- Gender and Development
- Poverty Reduction
- Private Sector Development
- Regional Cooperation and Integration
- Social Development
- Urban Development
- Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA)
- Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC)
- Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS)
- Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT)
- South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC)
- European Representative Office
- Japanese Representative Office [日本語]
- North American Representative Office
- Pacific Liaison and Coordination Office
- Pacific Subregional Office
Countries with Operations
- China, People's Republic of [中文]
- Cook Islands
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Lao PDR
- Marshall Islands
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Papua New Guinea
Country Assistance Program Evaluation for Pakistan (2007)
ADB administration and governance; Evaluation
|Series:||Country Assistance Program Evaluations|
This Country Assistance Program Evaluation (CAPE) assessed the performance of the Asian Development Bank's (ADB) development assistance to Pakistan during 1985-2006, the first whole-program study of operations in Pakistan prepared by the Operations Evaluation Department of ADB.
Summary of findings
Pakistan has provided a very challenging context in which to implement a development program. The report outlines a number of implications of this reality for ADB operations, a number of which have not been addressed. This has contributed to less successful operations. Prior strategies have not produced a coherent and focused program of operations. As of year-end 2006, ADB had 80 loans in its portfolio. It has operated across 10 sectors and around 30 subsectors. On the other hand, there have been very few private sector operations. The CAPE placed particular attention on client perceptions of ADB performance. Clients see ADB as responsive, flexible, empathetic, and non-prescriptive in its dealings with the Government. On the other hand, clients universally disliked ADB's business processes, which are seen as slow and cumbersome. Clients see that the Pakistan Resident Mission (PRM) lacks delegated authority and is weak in sector expertise.
The performance of ADB's operations in Pakistan over the last 20 years was rated "partly successful." Performance varied by sector. Operations in the power and roads sectors were rated "successful." Those in the agriculture and natural resources; education; finance; and law, economic management, and public policy sectors were rated "partly successful" (the latter being a tentative assessment given that most operations are ongoing). The programs in support of health, nutrition and social protection; and water supply, sanitation, and waste management were rated "unsuccessful."
This evaluation provides conclusions based on its assessment of the performance of ADB development assistance in Pakistan, grouped into four interrelated categories:
- resource allocation decisions
- design of operations
- program management, and
- business processes.
The overall conclusion is that ADB has too many loans in its Pakistan portfolio across too many sectors and subsectors for the staff and TA resources it has available, and given the requirements of its business processes. These need to be brought into alignment. In addition to a strategy that contributes to a more focused program, firm strategic management is required.
- In the absence of a major increase in the number of staff assigned to support operations in Pakistan, ADB should reduce the number of sectors and subsectors in which it is involved. Four core lending and two core nonlending sectors would be appropriate, with a more focused approach within these sectors (i.e., fewer subsectors covered). Staff resources allocated to PRM need to be aligned better with the requirements of the program of this major client.
- ADB should try to increase significantly its private sector operations in Pakistan in a manner that creates synergies with its public sector operations.
- The balance needs to be adjusted between (a) lending; and (b) economic, sector, and thematic work and policy dialogue. The second element should be emphasized more to ensure that operations are underpinned by a more rigorous analysis, and that ADB becomes recognized as a leading source of ideas in its sectors of core focus.
- The preparation of ADB-funded projects in Pakistan (including the use of project preparatory technical assistance [TA]) should be reviewed with a view to moving the responsibility for project design primarily from ADB to the Government. ADB would continue to provide support from funds currently allocated for project preparatory TA, and training to executing agencies where needed.
- If ADB increases PRM staff resources significantly, greater efforts are needed to ensure compliance with the Resident Mission Policy for full involvement of resident mission staff in processing projects. Similarly, and subject to the same proviso, the delegation of project administration needs to be accelerated, and projects should be delegated as soon as possible after approval before they run into implementation problems.
- To complement zero tolerance to corruption in its projects, ADB needs to ensure that it understands the nature, extent, and drivers of corruption in each sector in which it engages. The aim is to ensure that project design and/or separate initiatives incorporate effective anticorruption measures at the sector or country level. As required under the Second Governance and Anticorruption Action Plan, this will involve conducting risk assessments and preparing risk management plans. Overcoming corruption is likely to involve greater use of country systems (particularly for procurement), as well as capacity development to implement these.
- Executive Summary
- Development Context and Government Priorities
- The Asian Development Bank's Strategy and Program
- Program Implementation
- Results Achieved, Performance Assessment, and Rating
- Conclusions and Recommendations