- Key Facts
- Board of Governors
- Board of Directors
- Departments and Offices
- Policies and Strategies
- Annual Meetings
- Independent Evaluation
- Public Sector (Sovereign) Financing
- Private Sector (Nonsovereign) Financing
- Funds and Resources
- Asian Development Fund
- ASEAN Infrastructure Fund
- Investor Information[日本語]
- Business Opportunities
- Consulting Services
- ADB-Japan Scholarship Program
- News & Events
- Data & Research
- Industry and Trade
- Information and Communication Technology
- Public Sector Management
- Social Protection
- Capacity Development
- Climate Change
- Environmental Sustainability
- Gender and Development
- Poverty Reduction
- Private Sector Development
- Regional Cooperation and Integration
- Social Development
- Urban Development
- Brunei Darussalam-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area (BIMP-EAGA)
- Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC)
- Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS)
- Indonesia-Malaysia-Thailand Growth Triangle (IMT-GT)
- South Asia Subregional Economic Cooperation (SASEC)
- European Representative Office
- Japanese Representative Office [日本語]
- North American Representative Office
- Pacific Liaison and Coordination Office
- Pacific Subregional Office
Countries with Operations
- China, People's Republic of [中文]
- Cook Islands
- Indonesia [Bahasa Indonesia]
- Kyrgyz Republic
- Lao PDR
- Marshall Islands
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Papua New Guinea
Effectiveness of ADB's Capacity Development Assistance: How to Get Institutions Right
|Series:||Special Evaluation Studies|
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Development Assistance Committee has defined capacity development as "the process whereby people, organizations, and society as a whole unleash, strengthen, create, adapt, and maintain capacity over time." ADB has adopted this definition. ADB formally recognized the importance of capacity development in August 2004, when the comprehensive Reform Agenda was adopted and capacity development became one of 19 reform initiatives. Promoting capacity development was then also elevated as a new thematic priority in ADB lending and technical assistance operations.
In 2005, the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness called for capacity development to be an explicit objective of the national development and poverty reduction strategies of partner countries. This evaluation study aimed to assess ADB's contribution to this global development agenda. Building on findings of (i) existing evaluation studies related to capacity development and (ii) an analysis of four sectors (education, road transport, governance, and public financial management) across three countries (Cambodia, Nepal, and Philippines), the study examined performance at four levels, viz., individual, organizational, network of organizations, and the enabling environment. The four sectors were selected because of their importance under ADB's Medium-Term Strategy II, 2006-2008, and the three countries were selected because they reflect different socioeconomic and capability levels.
Summary of findings
Perhaps predictably, the overall findings from the study revealed mixed results, with no consistent patterns of success across sectors, countries, regions, or time. However, a consistent set of factors affecting capacity development performance was observed and identified-meaning factors that drive success (success drivers or strengths) and factors that deter from it (deterrence factors or weaknesses). These positive and negative factors were classified into four categories:
- design and quality-at-entry factors within ADB's control
- design and quality-at-entry factors beyond ADB's control
- implementation factors within ADB's control
- implementation factors beyond ADB's control
Lessons to improve capacity development performance can be drawn from the success drivers summarized under the four categories. These should be considered as a set of good practice standards for ADB's future assistance. Since the success drivers in categories 1 and 3 are design and quality-at-entry factors and implementation factors within ADB's control, they can be achieved through improvement in ADB's design and implementation practices for capacity development interventions. Since the success drivers in categories 2 and 4 are design and quality-at-entry factors as well as implementation factors beyond ADB's control, which are contextual or external level factors by nature, they tend to act as incentives (opportunities) to capacity development performance. However, the negative side of these factors will tend to act as risks or constraints (threats) to capacity development performance. Although ADB has no direct control over these risks, some of them should be identified and mitigation mechanisms formulated (e.g., through policy dialogue, conditionalities, and loan covenants) during the design stage with good diagnostics. In more challenging environments, it may be necessary to be more realistic by developing a phased approach to capacity development interventions or deferring them until some of these risks are addressed.
Success drivers contributing to effectiveness and sustainability of capacity development assistance
|Factors within ADB's control||Factors beyond ADB's control|
|Design and Quality-at-Entry||
- Provide guidance for assessing country capacity development needs and strategies, and identify an appropriate location for the presentation of the analysis in the country partnership strategy.
- Identify appropriate modalities for a long-term and country-led engagement in major capacity development initiatives in country partnership strategies.
- Build country ownership and demand for capacity development.
- Continue to pay strategic attention to the quality of capacity development interventions.
- Pilot test alternative capacity development approaches.
- Adjust staff recruitment skills mix to emphasize the soft skills required for capacity development.
- Make optimal use of resident missions.
Institutional Assessment and Capacity Development: Why, What and How?, a reference document published by EuropeAid, explains that aid agencies can by doing less and doing it well often do better. This statement is consistent with the findings of the study and should guide ADB's capacity development activities. However, even less ambitious capacity development initiatives need to be supported by other aspects of good practices and success drivers, particularly those within ADB's control. Much remains to be done by ADB to improve some internal business practices to put the preconditions for these good capacity development practices in place.
- Executive Summary
- I. Introduction
- II. Why Do Institutions Matter?
- III. Methodology For Evaluating Capacity Development Performance
- IV. Effectiveness of ADB’s Capacity Development Assistance
- V. Issues/Factors Affecting Capacity Development Performance
- VI. Conclusions: Moving Forward
- Supplementary Appendixes