Home
Publications
Catalog
Online Publications
Document
Financial Sector Legal and Regulatory Toolkit : Part Three: Financial Regulation and Supervision : I. Financial Stability, Development and Institutional Design
A. Design of the Financial Safety Net
According to the G-22 Working Group on Strengthening Financial Systems [ PDF ], a financial safety net normally consists of
The distribution of powers and responsibilities between the financial safety net participants is a matter of public policy choice and individual country circumstances. A number of key components, however, should be addressed.
Supervision cannot, and should not, provide an assurance that financial institutions will not fail. As a general principle, supervisors should develop contingency plans for dealing with financial institutions insolvencies in the context of their individual financial systems, as well as consideration of any cross-border situations that could arise. Financial authorities should consider implementation of properly designed early intervention programs. This issue is an essential aspect of financial regulation discussed below in the context of banking, securities, insurance and pensions, and financial conglomerates. Financial authorities should develop appropriate systems of liquidity support for financial institutions and the financial system generally. The most common mechanism to ensure the provision of liquidity in conditions of stress is the Lender of Last Resort (LoLR) function. These issues are discussed further below in the context of bank insolvency and depositor protection. Financial authorities should establish appropriate means of consumer protection. The most common form is a system of deposit insurance. These issues are discussed further below in the context of bank insolvency and depositor protection. Effective and timely resolution of insolvencies is probably one of the most important elements of a well-designed financial safety net. The existence of weak financial institutions, especially banks, can undermine the entire financial system. Therefore, weak financial institutions should either be on a path that will restore their financial health or, if that is not deemed to be feasible, closed in a timely fashion. A coherent system for the restructuring and resolution of weak financial institutions is crucial in reducing the risk of contagion within the financial system and to the economy at large. An effective resolution system also reduces the overall costs to the government of dealing with failing institutions, as well as other costs (ranging from the loss of asset values to the social costs of having a smaller financial system). Finally, it greatly facilitates the alternative of taking action at the right time. For these reasons, methods for restructuring and resolution of financial institutions are important for maintaining financial stability. Financial authorities should establish an appropriate framework for restructuring or resolving problem financial institutions. Office of the General Counsel
|
| © 2009 Asian Development Bank Privacy | Terms of Use |
|