Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Evaluation

Home : Topics : Evaluation : Work Program : Project Performance Evaluation on the Engineering Education Development Project in Indonesia

About Evaluation
Evaluation Resources
Work Program
Evaluation Capacity Development
Harmonization Work
Evaluation Chats
Linking to Results
Events
Contact Us


Ongoing Evaluations
Evaluation on the Engineering Education Development Project in Indonesia

Team Leader: Maria Olivia Nuestro, Evaluation Officer
Share your views

The Government of Indonesia recognized, through its development plans, that a strong competitive workforce is a precondition for sustainable national progress and that an increased share of higher education graduates, particularly engineering graduates in the labor force, is a key to rapid industrialization and increased competitiveness. In line with this, REPELITA VI, which spanned 1994/95 through 1998/99, included measures to increase long-term industrial growth by improving the relevance and quality of manpower training, encouraging businesses to shift from low-cost labor to higher skill intensive products, and improving and expanding training institutions. In this connection, the Government requested ADB to finance the Engineering Education Development Project, which aimed to assist in improving the quality, relevance, and capacity of engineering education, while enhancing the access of economically disadvantaged but qualified students.

This evaluation aims to assess the relevance, efficacy, efficiency, sustainability, and impact of the Project. It will also identify the reasons for success, lessons, and other factors that made the Project the only one rated highly successful among eight other higher education projects.

EVALUATION APPROACH PAPER
Main Text [ PDF: 103kb | 5 pages ]
Appendix 1: Basic Data [ PDF: 55kb | 1 page ]
Appendix 2: Project's Key Components, Outputs, and Achievements [ PDF: 193 kb | 4 pages ]
Appendix 3: List of Project Institutions [ PDF: 48kb | 1 page ]
Appendix 4: Evaluation Matrix [ PDF: 107kb | 3 pages ]
Appendix 5: Terms of Reference [ PDF: 167kb | 5 pages ]
Appendix 6: Summary of Project Inputs by Component [ PDF: 28kb | 1 page ]

MILESTONE SCHEDULE STATUS
Evaluation Approach Paper June 2008 Approved in June 2008
Fieldwork July to August 2008 Fielded
Final Report June 2009 Pending