Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program: Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
|PDS Creation Date||04 Mar 2008|
|PDS Updated as of||21 Oct 2013|
|Project Name||Municipal Services Development Project|
|Geographical Location||All municipal governments within Georgia|
|In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.|
|Sector and/or Subsector Classification||Multisector
|Thematic Classification||Environmental sustainability
|Gender Mainstreaming Categories||Some gender benefits|
|Type/Modality of Assistance||Approval Number||Source of Funding||Approved Amount (thousand)|
|Loan||2441||Asian Development Fund||40,000|
For more information about the safeguard categories, please see http://www.adb.org/site/safeguards/safeguard-categories
|During Project Design
The main stakeholders will be MDF, participating municipal governments, communities, and civil society organizations. MDF and participating municipal governments (MG) will ensure that for all subprojects the results of social assessments and stakeholder consultations will be adequately taken into account in identifying investment priorities. Consultation will be carried out through public hearings, surveys, workshops, and other meetings during project implementation and monitoring.
|During Project Implementation
i) Municipal Government to prepare and submit a project proposal to MDF; ii) Municipal Government to provide necessary information, statistics, and project data during various studies including feasibility of the subproject; iii) MDF to carry-out preparation of investment projects; iv) MDF responsible for the coordination and overall management of its activities; v) MDF to carry-out all financial management activities in accordance with Georgian law and regulations, and donors requirements; vi) MDF to overseas day-to-day operations of project management office and manage project implementation; vii) MDF to provide technical and logistical support required for efficient operation; viii) Municipal Government to provide necessary inputs such as logistics during project implementation; ix) Municipal Government to join commissioning of the project facilities after completion of the project facilities; x) Municipal Government to operate and maintain the project facilities in accordance with the operations manual of the project facilities prepared; xi) MDF to carry-out procurement for investment projects.
|The objective of the Project is assist project municipal governments to improve delivery of basic urban services. The Project comprises two components: investment projects and capacity development. The outputs of the investment component are loans and grants to municipalities and local utility companies to improve basic urban services and infrastructure. The outputs of the capacity development component are (i) feasibility, engineering design, environmental and social, and other related studies for project preparation and appraisal; (ii) decentralized process for identification, planning, preparation and implementation of subprojects; (iii) institutionalized corporate and business planning process within MDF; and (iv) studies and training to develop MDF capacity.|
|Municipal services including water supply and sanitation, solidwaste management, road repair, and urban transport in Georgia have deteriorated due to economic collapse, political instability, and a vitiated policy and institutional environment since the dissolution of the former Soviet Union. Capital investments in infrastructure and operation and maintenance (O&M) have been neglected nationwide. As a result, the quality of municipal services is low. Ownership and delivery of these services belongs to municipal government. Although municipalities have a mandate to deliver these services, in many instances they do not have the financial and technical resources to do the job. Key service targets such as coverage, quality, and continuity have been falling or are already at unreasonably low levels. This situation affects the quality of life of people but also constrains investment, business development, and ultimately the creation of jobs. Most principal and secondary towns are equally affected by this problem. The Government understands the issue and has started to put together a strategic framework and support actions to address it. The most effective of the measures taken is the establishment of the MDF. This fund provides finance and technical advice to municipal governments. Its work so far has been effective but coverage needs to be expanded further. To date, more than 10 municipalities have benefited from MDF operations. Decentralization was seen as central to achieving the objectives. Since 1997, the Government has carried out local government reforms in two stages, and in that time MDF has managed to extend finance to local governments while generating enough revenues to convert it into effectively a revolving fund. The Project will focus on improving basic municipal services and the rehabilitation, repair, and extension of dilapidated urban infrastructure. It will also provide technical assistance to assist the participating municipalities in improving local revenues, financial management, and reporting systems. Moreover, an integral part of the Project is to provide institutional strengthening and capacity development to municipalities to ensure the sustainability of project benefits. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is not the only international financing institution working with the Government and MDF. The World Bank has already financed two municipal development projects. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has also participated in several large water supply projects, some of them cofinanced with the Millennium Challenge Corporation on a parallel basis. The Millennium Challenge Corporation is the largest bilateral source of grant aid for Georgia, and is mainly involved in the rehabilitation of water supply, sewerage, and irrigation systems. The other bilateral aid agencies are involved in the municipal sectors, mostly through technical cooperation by cofinancing with multilateral financial agencies. The Project is the first ADB intervention in the country. It will build on the experience of other multilateral and bilateral financial institutions projects. Cooperation with other financial institutions is critical and the Ministry of Finance has taken an impressive lead in ensuring such cooperation. This is particularly important for the institutional strengthening activities under the Project, which will be designed in consultation with other international aid agencies. This will maximize benefits, avoid unnecessary and costly overlap, and prevent confusion in policy matters.|
|Improved urban environment and public health within urban areas.|
|Description of Outcome
Improved service delivery and better living conditions within urban areas.
|Progress Towards Outcome
As of date, 105,000 households benefit from improved municipal services.
|Description of Project Outputs
Part A - Investment Projects Financing Facility Part B - Project Management and Capacity Development
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)
Project Completion Review Mission fielded on 4-9 September 2012. Draft Project Completion Report to be circulated in October 2012.
|Status of Development Objectives
|Date of First Listing||2008 Mar 06|
The selection and engagement of consulting services to be financed under the Project will be in accordance with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2007, as amended from time to time) and the procurement plan. The following methods of selection will be applied: (i) quality-and cost-based selection; (ii) quality based selection; (iii) consultants' qualifications selection for small consultant assignments that cost less than $200,000 per contract; (iv) least cost selection for very small consultant assignment that cost less than $100,000; (v) fixed budget selection; (vi) single source selection and ADB's procedures for individual consultant selection for individual international or domestic consultants for following types of assignments: environmental, social, tariff, and O&M studies. Advance Contracting and Retroactive Financing - To be able to start construction in June 2008, preparation work must begin in April 2008. The Government has requested, and ADB approved advance contracting and retroactive financing for recruitment of consultants for feasibility studies, detailed engineering designs, and preparation of bidding documents for subprojects, and associated civil works. Advance contracting allows the Government and MDF to undertake procurement procedures, at its own risk, prior to the loan becoming effective. The Government and MDF were informed that, for expenses incurred under advance contracting to be eligible for ADB's rectroactive financing, such procedures (including advertising) must comply with ADB's Procurement Guidelines and ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants. Once the loan becomes effective, up to 20% of the amount may be used to finance eligible expenditures incurred, pursuant to advance contracting, during the period not exceeding 12 months prior to signing the Loan Agreement. Alternatively, the Government and MDF may opt for advance contracting without retroactive financing, in which case the procurement procedures completed under advance contracting do not conclude with the award of contract until after the loan becomes effective. The Government and MDF acknowledged that such advance contracting will be undertaken at their own risk, and that any concurrence by ADB with the procedures, documentation, or proposal for award of contract does not commit ADB to finance any such expenditures or the Project. The ADB project team will orient Government and MDF staff regarding ADB's Procurement Guidelines and ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants.
All procurement financed under the Project will be carried out in accordance with the ADB's Procurement Guidelines (2007, as amended from time to time). Contracts for civil works that are estimated to cost more than $1 million equivalent and contracts for goods that are estimated to cost more than $500,000 equivalent will be procured using international competitive bidding procedures. Civil works contracts estimated to cost $1 million equivalent or less, and contracts for procurement of goods estimated to cost between $100,000 and $500,000 equivalent will be carried out through national competitive bidding (NCB). Prior to commencement of any procurement activity under NCB, ADB and the Government will review the public procurement law to ensure that it is consistent with ADB's Procurement Guidelines. Any necessary modifications and clarifications to the public procurement law will be agreed between ADB and the Government and included in the procurement plan. Goods contracts estimated to cost less than $100,000 equivalent will be carried out through shopping procedures. Goods valued below $10,000 and civil works valued up to $10,000 may be purchased directly from the supplier and contractor.
|Procurement and Consulting Notices
|Concept Clearance||09 Oct 2007|
|Fact-finding||11 Feb 2008 to 22 Feb 2008|
|Management Review Meeting||01 Apr 2008|
|Approval||12 Sep 2008|
|Last Review Mission||–|
|Loan 2441||12 Sep 2008||11 Nov 2008||12 Dec 2008||30 Jun 2013||–||27 Feb 2013|
|Date||Approval Number||ADB (US$ thousand)||Others (US$ thousand)||Net Percentage|
|Cumulative Contract Awards|
|20 Apr 2014||Loan 2441||38,224||0||100.00%|
|20 Apr 2014||Loan 2441||38,224||0||100.00%|
Covenants are categorized under the following categories—audited accounts, safeguards, social, sector, financial, economic, and others. Covenant compliance is rated by category by applying the following criteria: (i) Satisfactory—all covenants in the category are being complied with, with a maximum of one exception allowed, (ii) Partly Satisfactory—a maximum of two covenants in the category are not being complied with, (iii) Unsatisfactory—three or more covenants in the category are not being complied with. As per the 2011 Public Communications Policy, covenant compliance ratings for Project Financial Statements apply only to projects whose invitation for negotiation falls after 2 April 2012.
|Sector||Social||Financial||Economic||Others||Safeguards||Project Financial Statements|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Bertrand Goalou (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
|Responsible ADB Department||Central and West Asia Department|
|Responsible ADB Divisions||Urban Development and Water Division, CWRD|
Municipal Development Fund of Georgia
Mr. Konstantine Mgeladze
|List of Project Documents||http://www.adb.org/projects/41198-013/documents|