Project Data Sheet

Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program: Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.

PDS Creation Date
PDS Updated as of 30 Sep 2014

Project Name Polytechnics Education Development Project
Country Indonesia
Project/Program Number 42099-013
Status Approved
Geographical Location
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Sector Education
Subsector Technical and vocational education and training
Strategic Agendas Inclusive economic growth (IEG)
Drivers of Change Gender equity and mainstreaming (GEM)
Governance and capacity development (GCD)
Partnerships (PAR)
Gender Equity and Mainstreaming Categories Category 2: Effective gender mainstreaming (EGM)


Type/Modality of Assistance Approval Number Source of Funding Approved Amount (thousand)
Loan2928Ordinary capital resources75,000
Grant0343Canadian Grant4,950
Counterpart 16,700
TOTAL US$ 96,650

Safeguard Categories

For more information about the safeguard categories, please see

Environment C
Involuntary Resettlement C
Indigenous Peoples C

Summary of Environmental and Social Issues

Environmental Aspects
Project will not have any adverse environmental impacts.
Involuntary Resettlement
No major civil works are expected. Through application to the competitive fund, which will be established by the project, polytechnics will be provided with equipment. Only where the equipment cannot fit into existing workshops, minor civil works will be needed in order to provide for the necessary workshop extension. There will be no temporary or permanent loss of land or other assets in the civil works.
Indigenous Peoples
There will be no negative impact on disadvantaged ethnic groups. However, the increased quality of the polytechnic education as well the increased access to the polytechnics, which will be the result of the Project, will also benefit indigenous people.

Stakeholder Communication, Participation and Consultation

During Project Design
The Executing Agency for the PPTA PDP is the Directorate General of Higher Education (DGHE) of the Ministry of National Education (MoNE). The implementation of the PPTA is supervised by the Director of the Directorate for Learning Programs and Student Affairs (till recently named the Directorate of Academic Affairs). An advisory counterpart team of DGHE to work with the TA was appointed under the supervision of the Director of Learning Programs and Student Affairs consisting of professional staff of Polytechnic Institutions (7 members) and MoNE (10 members). In the inception phase, the counterpart team presented its draft Strategic Plan for Polytechnic Development 2010-2014 indicating preferred directions for the intended project, which were taken into account by the PPTA team in the design of the project during the second phase. The draft Plan had been developed in early 2010 in anticipation of the ADB support to the sector. Also, the planning of the PPTA project was discussed in the inception phase with the objective to align the activities of both teams, to agree on working arrangements and operation in preparation for the Polytechnic Development Project. Since the start of the project there has been a series of meetings of the counterpart team with the PPTA experts team on the planning and activities of the TA and especially on the development of the Problem Tree and the DMF for the project. There have also been joined field visits for the sector assessment, and the PPTA experts were invited to three workshops in which all state Polytechnics participated to present and discuss the initial design of the PDP. The workshops provided an opportunity to inform all state Polytechnics on the intended PDP and to receive their feedback and recommendations on the implementation of the PDP. A major concern of the counterpart team has been the timely production of the final project document for the PDP loan to allow the use of earmarked GoI funds for the PDP in 2011. A large number of polytechnics, other TVET and higher educational institutions, education and training support institutions, industries, industrial associations, ministries and donor agencies were visited for interviews, discussions, meetings, collecting information and informing them on the intended PDP. Some 32 visits were made to different public and private polytechnics, some 16 visits to different industries, 8 visits to supporting agencies (BNSP, LSP, Kopertis, BAN-PT, ASPI, SEAMOLEC), and 7 visits to Ministries other than MONE. Around 95 interviews were conducted with one or more resource persons. A workshop with the donor community and stakeholders from the polytechnic education sector was held in the Ministry of Education on 29th July 2010, in which the PPTA was presented and discussed to inform the international donor community and stakeholders on the intended PDP. Several donors, including ADB, presented their visions and plans in the context of overall skills development policies and requirements in Indonesia, and options for donor coordination and alignment were discussed. The series of meetings and workshops with the MoNE counterpart group and involving representatives of the Polytechnics were an important venue to socialize the project objectives and approach and to get feedback in the process of defining the project design and the technical approaches for its implementation. Some 16 meetings were held with the counterpart group till May 2011. Of special importance were the meetings with all polytechnic directors and management staff arranged by the counterpart group, respectively in Manado, Surabaya, Batam and Jakarta. The objectives of the PDP were socialized and intensively discussed with the polytechnic directors and managing staff, including implementation strategies. For the definition of the Problem Tree based upon the findings of the assessment phase, and for the initial design of the DMF, the project team had a series of intensive focus group discussions by which both documents gradually took shape and were prepared for further consultation with the ADB and stakeholders at the central and institutional levels.
During Project Implementation
The Directorate General of Higher Education (DGHE) of the Ministry of National Education (MONE) will be the Executing Agency (EA) for the project. The EA will be responsible for the overall management and implementation of the project. A project steering committee will be established, chaired by the Deputy Minister of BAPPENAS, to provide strategic guidance for the project. This committee will comprise persons from key sector stakeholders including BAPPENAS, relevant employer associations and the Ministry of Manpower and Trans Migration (MOMT). The MOF will be responsible for disbursement of the Project funds. The project management unit (PMU) will be established by DGHE, under the guidance of the project director who is the Director of Learning and Student Affairs in DGHE. The PMU will be headed by a project manager and will be responsible for day-to-day project implementation, planning and budgeting, procurement, disbursement, monitoring, supervising, overseeing of implementation in project institutions, and submitting the required reports to the Government and ADB. Disbursements from the national skills fund will require approval from key stakeholders particularly government and industrial organisations and employer associations. The project will also establish a web based resource to allow interested organisations/individuals to track project activities and progress in meeting project outputs.


Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy

The Government's Economic Development Master Plan 2011 - 2025 seeks to accelerate economic growth to 12% per annum, create jobs and expand development to poorer regions. Six economic corridors are established, eight sectors prioritized to achieve a "self-sufficient, advanced, equitable, and prosperous Indonesia". Component 3 of this plan seeks improvements to human resources to ensure skills are available to realise the policy objectives of the plan. The proposed polytechnic development project supports these plans by increasing access to a quality polytechnic vocational education system. A system that will deliver improved skills that meets the identified needs of employers and the employment objectives and income levels of graduates. Four of the eight sectors identified by the Master Plan are to be targeted through the proposed project, these are: (i) manufacturing; (ii) infrastructure; (iii) mining; and (iv) agro-industry. Some 75% of employment in Indonesia requires improvement in technical skills to increase enterprise productivity. To remain viable and create additional employment opportunities, enterprises need to improve service standards, produce better quality products, improve work organization, technology usage and build value chains that increase production share or capture value throughout the economy. This is a difficult task given that 90% of workers throughout Indonesia are employed by micro and small enterprises employing fewer than six workers . Over 70% of the employed population works in informal establishments performing low skilled jobs. Vocational schools, supported by the ADB INVEST project , provide quality skills formation for these jobs. To improve the quality and level of skills available to the labour market for higher skilled occupations requires engagement with the polytechnic sector. Currently unemployment amongst polytechnic graduates remains high and participation rates remain low. Graduates often wait for long periods (12 months) to find employment in areas where they have been trained and are often retrained by employers in manufacturing, infrastructure and mining sectors of the economy. Underemployment is close to 40% which further indicates mismatches between skills acquired through current higher education (including polytechnics) with what is required in the labour market . ADB country strategies (including the current Country Operations Business Plan 2011-2013, Education ASR 2010-2015) identify the low competitiveness of firms as a key constraint to growth particularly the low skills and low productivity of the workforce. Middle level skills have been identified by industry associations in each of the four economic sectors critical to growth plans . The government is also acutely aware of the need to substantially up-skill its workforce if the country is going to improve competitiveness measured against its Asian regional neighbors or achieve the objectives of the Master Plan.

Development Impact

The impact will be the polytechnic education to produce graduates responsive to the needs of the labor market and contribute toward increasing productivity in the Priority Sectors

Project Outcome

Description of Outcome
Polytechnic education is aligned to the MP3EI in 5 priority sectors.
Progress Towards Outcome
The 13 pre-selected polytechnics and 27 public and private polytechnics, that were selected through the National Skills Funds- Competititve Scheme, had finalized their development proposals and procurement plans that aim to improve and strengthen their polytechnic institutions. The focus of all the development proposals is to ensure increased enrollment and relevance of the polytechnics with industrial needs, in accordance to the five priority sectors stipulated in the Master Plan for Acceleration and Expansion of Indonesia's Economic Development (MP3EI).

Outputs and Implementation Progress

Description of Project Outputs
Increased quality and relevance of polytechnic system. Increased and more equitable access to polytechnic institutions Increased private sector involvement and promotion of an entrepreneurial culture to strengthen polytechnic graduate competitiveness Strengthened governance and management of polytechnic education
Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)
Ouput 1 - Indicator 1: 30% of the Polytechnics had been upgraded with facilities and equipment, while the rest are ongoing and estimated to be completed by early 2015. Output 1 - Indicator 2: There is difficulty to identify eligible lecturers, with main issues lay in language barrier and lack of young lecturers. Only one lecturer had been sent to enroll in a development program. Output 1 - Indicator 3: The polytechnics experience difficulty in identifying relevant resource person to assist them in this area (IQF). It is decided that such assistance will be provided and procured by the Central Project Management Unit and capacity building activities for the Polytechnics to develop this program will be done through a series of workshops and assistanceship. Output 2 - Indicator 1: The project has achieved 16% of its target in establishing Partnership agreements with SMK. Output 2 - Indicator 2: The Recognition Prior Learning (RPL) manual are in the process of development and is expected to ready to be implemented by 2015. Output 2 - Indicator 3: 30% of the scholarships had been awarded. Identification of number of females recipient is currently undertaken. Output 4 - indicator 1: Over 200 polytechnic management staffs had been trained to increase their capacity in project management. Output 4 - Indicator 2: Monitoring and Reporting System has been implemented and constantly undergoing improvement measures. Output 4 - indicator 3: 27 Polytechnics had been selected through the National Skills Funds (NSF)- Competititve Scheme.
Status of Development Objectives
Material Changes

Business Opportunities

Date of First Listing
Consulting Services
Procurement and Consulting Notices


Concept Clearance
Fact-finding 01 Dec 2011 to 23 Dec 2011
Management Review Meeting 16 Mar 2012
Approval 31 Oct 2012
Last Review Mission


Approval No. Approval Signing Effectivity Closing
Original Revised Actual
Loan 2928 31 Oct 2012 21 Nov 2012 07 Jan 2013 30 Jun 2018


Date Approval Number ADB (US$ thousand) Others (US$ thousand) Net Percentage
Cumulative Contract Awards
25 Oct 2014 Loan 2928 6,122 0 8.00%
Cumulative Disbursements
25 Oct 2014 Loan 2928 5,433 0 7.00%

Status of Covenants

Covenants are categorized under the following categories—audited accounts, safeguards, social, sector, financial, economic, and others. Covenant compliance is rated by category by applying the following criteria: (i) Satisfactory—all covenants in the category are being complied with, with a maximum of one exception allowed, (ii) Partly Satisfactory—a maximum of two covenants in the category are not being complied with, (iii) Unsatisfactory—three or more covenants in the category are not being complied with. As per the 2011 Public Communications Policy, covenant compliance ratings for Project Financial Statements apply only to projects whose invitation for negotiation falls after 2 April 2012.

Approval No. Category
Sector Social Financial Economic Others Safeguards Project Financial Statements
Loan 2928
Grant 0343

Contacts and Update Details

Responsible ADB Officer Renadi Budiman (
Responsible ADB Department Southeast Asia Department
Responsible ADB Divisions Indonesia Resident Mission
Executing Agencies Directorate General of Higher Education


Project Website
List of Project Documents