| Date: | September 2013 |
| Type: | Reports |
| Series: | Asia Bond Monitor |
| ISBN: | 978-92-9254-258-0 (print), 978-92-9254-259-7 (web) |
| ISSN: | 2219-1518 (print), 2219-1526 (web) |
Emerging East Asia has witnessed an outflow of funds since the 22 May remarks of US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke that US monetary policy could soon be tightened. A slower growth outlook for the region has also contributed to capital flowing out, with the withdrawal of funds leading to rising bond yields and depreciating currencies.
The turmoil in global financial markets has made it harder and more expensive for companies to issue foreign currency bonds. However, the issuance of local currency bonds has been less affected.
The capital outflows highlight the need to promote more stable sources of funding. Promoting greater intra-Asian holdings of financial assets can help shield the region’s financial markets from global financial volatility.
Bond markets in the region are more resilient now than during the 1997/98 Asian financial crisis as the growing use of local currency bonds has reduced currency mismatches.
Yet, risks to the region’s bond markets are intensifying. Specifically, (i) the region’s interest rates could rise further when the Federal Reserve starts to tighten policy; (ii) weakening growth momentum in the region could accelerate the pace of capital outflows; and (iii) continued outflows could result in vulnerable economies raising interest rates to prop up their currencies, thereby further dampening growth.
Infrastructure financing needs in Asia are significant. The region cannot afford to skimp on infrastructure as maximizing the benefits of investment spending often depends on having an adequate level of infrastructure.
Tighter global liquidity conditions and stronger prudential regulations under Basel III are constraining lending from banks, which have traditionally provided the bulk of infrastructure project financing. At the same time, there is growing demand for financial assets with long-term maturities among institutional investors such as pension funds. This makes it natural to promote the development of infrastructure bonds that can help bridge the financing gap.
A key hurdle to overcome is the shortage of quality infrastructure projects that can be bundled and offered to institutional investors who are usually mandated to invest in investment grade bonds. Guarantees and the creation of subordinated debt tranches can help improve the ratings of infrastructure bonds, while greater data transparency and a database of costs and past performance can help close the information gap for investors.
Some highlights from this issue of the Asian Bond Monitor:
The Asia Bond Monitor reviews recent developments in East Asian local currency bond markets along with the outlook, risks, and policy options. It covers the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) plus the PRC; Hong Kong,China; and the Republic of Korea.