Armenia : North-South Road Corridor Investment Program
The Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved the multitranche financing facility (MFF) in an aggregate amount not exceeding $500 million for the North-South Road Corridor Investment Program (the investment program) on 29 September 2009. The investment program will contribute to economic development and regional trade. Its outcome will be a more efficient, safe, and sustainable transport network. Expected outputs are: (i) 92.5 km north-south road corridor improved, (ii) modernized border and customs infrastructure and related facilities, and (iii) more efficient and effective road corridor management.
Project Details
-
Project Officer
Herz, Thomas
Sectors Group
Request for information -
Country/Economy
Armenia -
Modality
-
Sector
- Transport
Project Name | North-South Road Corridor Investment Program | ||||||||||||||
Project Number | 42145-013 | ||||||||||||||
Country / Economy | Armenia |
||||||||||||||
Project Status | Active | ||||||||||||||
Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Grant Loan |
||||||||||||||
Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||||||||||||
Strategic Agendas | Inclusive economic growth Regional integration |
||||||||||||||
Drivers of Change | Gender Equity and Mainstreaming Governance and capacity development Private sector development |
||||||||||||||
Sector / Subsector | Transport / |
||||||||||||||
Gender | Some gender elements | ||||||||||||||
Description | The Asian Development Bank (ADB) approved the multitranche financing facility (MFF) in an aggregate amount not exceeding $500 million for the North-South Road Corridor Investment Program (the investment program) on 29 September 2009. The investment program will contribute to economic development and regional trade. Its outcome will be a more efficient, safe, and sustainable transport network. Expected outputs are: (i) 92.5 km north-south road corridor improved, (ii) modernized border and customs infrastructure and related facilities, and (iii) more efficient and effective road corridor management. | ||||||||||||||
Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | The Agarak-Kapan-Yerevan-Bavra route (M1 and 2 roads) crossing Armenia from south to north is further connected to Georgia's east-west highway that leads to Poti and Batumi at the Black Sea. This route provides Armenia with the shortest access to the seaports linked to Europe, the Russian Federation, and Turkey. Meanwhile, the government of Georgia is improving the east-west highway and plans to improve the Bavra-Zhdanov-Akhaltskha-Batumi road as an alternative connectivity to Black Sea ports from Tbilisi. This will enable the Armenia cargoes to be transported to Black Sea ports easily through a shorter route. On the basis of this potential, the Government has developed a North-South Road Corridor Development Program as a priority and ADB will support it through an MFF. The investment program will promote regional cooperation and trade by improving the north-south road corridor and related border crossings in Armenia. It is the Government's top priority to stimulate the national economy and gain shorter and more efficient access to nearest sea ports of the Black Sea. It will be complemented by the ADB-assisted regional road corridor development programs in Azerbaijan and Georgia to link the subregion to international markets more closely. It is thus in line with ADB's regional cooperation and integration theme under the Strategy 2020, country operations business plan for Armenia, and the regional cooperation strategy in Central Asia and Caucasus. |
||||||||||||||
Impact | Increased subregional trade and accelerated economic development in Armenia. |
Project Outcome | |
---|---|
Description of Outcome | Efficient, safe, and sustainable transport on the north-south road corridor. |
Progress Toward Outcome | To allow for the completion of the projects under the MFF, particularly Projects 2 and 3, ADB approved the extension of the MFF availability period by about 21 months from 31 December 2017 to 14 September 2019. |
Implementation Progress | |
Description of Project Outputs | 92.5 km north-south road corridor improved Road subsector plan implemented Road subsector management and institutional capacities improved Road safety infrastructure improved |
Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues) | All works and major consulting contracts under Projects 1, 2, and 3 have been awarded. Project 1 civil works is substantially completed and is in Defects Notification Period until October 2017. Projects 2 and 3 civil works are ongoing. Three crossings points on the Georgian border will be improved by 2017. Consultant selection for the road subsector plan and capacity building is expected to commence by end 2017. Safety improvements are part of the civil works to be completed in 2017. |
Geographical Location |
Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
---|---|
Environmental Aspects | An environmental assessment and review framework (EARF) covering environment safeguard tasks for the Investment Program in compliance with national laws and ADB's Environment Policy (2002) has been prepared and was approved by the Government. Project 1 is classified as environmental category B and thus an initial environmental examination (IEE) was prepared. Project 2 is classified as environmental category A due to the widening of the Ashtarak-Talin road section to 4 lanes and several significant impacts to archaeological sites. An environmental impact assessment (EIA) was prepared. All recommendations of the EIA, including the environment management plan (EMP), were incorporated in the bidding documents and consultants' contracts. Project 3 is classified as environmental category A. An updated EIA was prepared and posted on the ADB website on 26 July 2012. The EIA concludes that the impact on archaeological, historical, and cultural sites and monuments is widespread and requires special consideration. The EIA identifies 10 previously unknown archaeological sites. To safeguard the most important sites, the EMP contains mitigation measures. The EIA also determines that there is a potential impact on some rare flora and fauna. To mitigate those impacts, the EMP outlines a flora and fauna plan. All recommendations in the EMP are incorporated in the detailed design and bidding documents for the civil works contract to ensure proper mitigation and protection measures are taken. |
Involuntary Resettlement | A land acquisition and resettlement framework (LARF) regulating land acquisition and resettlement activities for the Investment Program in compliance with national laws and ADB's Involuntary Resettlement Policy (1995) has been prepared and was approved by the Government. Project 1 is classified as involuntary resettlement category C. Although no land acquisition is expected, impacts like loss of access for businesses have been identified. Consultations with community leaders were carried out and mitigation measures were developed to address such impacts. Project 2 is classified as involuntary resettlement category A due to significant land acquisition impact from the construction and widening of the AshtarakTalin road section. Project 3 is classified as category A for involuntary resettlement. The existing right-of-way will be widened to approximately 30 meters, which will cause significant land acquisition and resettlement impacts. MTCIT prepared a draft LARP based on the substantially completed detailed engineering design. |
Indigenous Peoples | Projects 1, 2, and 3 are classified as category C for indigenous peoples due to the absence from the project area of social groups qualifying as indigenous peoples. |
Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
During Project Design | The concerned stakeholders are grouped into (i) project sponsors - a central government represented by the ministries of economy (MOE), finance (MOF), and transport, communications and information technologies (MTCIT); (ii) regional administrations of the five marzpetaran (regional subdivision) where the road corridor lies; (iii) community leaders and councils of Avagani (council of elderly); (iv) community members, land owners and road users; (v) international organizations working in the project areas; and (vi) local and international NGOs, and other donor/funding organizations. These groups were consulted through interviews, group discussions, questionnaires and surveys to identify and incorporate their individual concerns in the project and overall program design and subsequent implementation with regard to detailed engineering designs, social development, resettlement and environment related issues. |
During Project Implementation | The MFF includes social and environment frameworks that outline principles for engaging affected people and communities and addressing social and environment related issues during the project implementation. In addition, bidding documents for civil works will include specific measures to ensure that the Program is implemented with gender, ethnic minority and environment concern in mind and creates equal opportunities for all social groups for employment and benefits. |
Business Opportunities | |
---|---|
Consulting Services | Services of consulting firms and/or individuals working jointly with national firms and/or individuals will be required to (i) prepare detailed designs and supervise civil works; (ii) monitor project performance, benefits and social and environment safeguards; (iii) help implement individual tranche components; (iv) prepare subsequent tranches; and (v) conduct technical and financial audits. EA/IA will select firms in accordance to ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants, using the quality- and cost-based selection (QCBS), quality-based selection (QBS), or consultant qualification selection (CQS) method depending on individual needs of project components and procurement plan. ADB and EA will perform due diligence before any of the methods and identify suitable weighting system for evaluating the firm's proposals. |
Procurement | Procurement of works and goods to be financed under the individual tranches of the ADB multitranche financing facility will be conducted in accordance with ADB's Procurement Guidelines. |
Responsible ADB Officer | Herz, Thomas |
Responsible ADB Department | Sectors Group |
Responsible ADB Division | Transport Sector Office (SG-TRA) |
Timetable | |
---|---|
Concept Clearance | 14 Jul 2009 |
Fact Finding | 18 Jul 2009 to 30 Jul 2009 |
MRM | 19 Aug 2009 |
Approval | 29 Sep 2009 |
Last Review Mission | - |
PDS Creation Date | 31 Jul 2009 |
Last PDS Update | 27 Sep 2017 |
MFF Facility Concept 0035-ARM
Financing Plan | Loan Utilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Amount in US$ million) | Date | ADB | Others | Net Percentage | |
Project Cost | 892.00 | Cumulative Contract Awards | |||
ADB | 500.00 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | % |
Counterpart | 392.00 | Cumulative Disbursements | |||
Cofinancing | 0.00 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 | % |
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
Title | Document Type | Document Date |
---|---|---|
North-South Road Corridor Investment Program | Resettlement Frameworks | Sep 2009 |
North-South Road Corridor Investment Program | Environmental Assessment and Review Framework | Aug 2009 |
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
Related Publications
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
Tenders
Contracts Awarded
Procurement Plan
None currently available.