Asian Development Bank - Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific
What's New  |   e-Notification  |   Sitemap  |   Contact Us  |   Help

Projects

Home : Projects : Project Web Sites : Protected Area Management and Wildlife Conservation Project

Table of Contents
p. 4 of 7 BACK | NEXT
Background
Project Components
Map
>>Frequently asked questions
Why the project is needed
Issues and concerns
Contact Us

Frequently asked questions



Was this project requested and approved by the Government of Sri Lanka?

As with all ADB-financed projects, this project fits within the framework of ADB's country assistance strategy. It was included, initially as a project preparatory technical assistance in ADB's country assistance program that is developed with the Government on a three-year rolling basis, updated yearly.

The program is signed off by the Government, specifically, the Ministry of Finance, and ADB at the end of the annual country programming mission. The document so agreed confirms the Government's request to ADB for assistance with developing the programs and projects detailed in the document.

The project was prepared in a consultative manner. The final project document and loan agreement were reviewed by the Attorney General's Department, Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Environment, and other relevant Government agencies before final approval and adoption.

 Top

Was there public consultation during project preparation?

The project was prepared in about two years between 1998 and 2000. It is the outcome of extensive discussions and deliberations by consultants working with a technical advisory group and later a task force appointed by the Minister in charge of the Wildlife sector. These groups included representatives from NGOs, and the private sector and to ex-officio government officials.

In formulating the project, the task force took a broader outlook and studied the sector more comprehensively by forming three sub-committees to separately address policy, legal and institutional issues. In all, the technical advisory group and task force met over 15 times between 1997 and 2000.

A series of consultation workshops, listed below, were held to discuss the project. The participants included a range of stakeholders from Department of Wildlife Conservation (DWLC) staff to community members of buffer zones.

Workshop Title Dates Location
Inauguration Workshop 8 June 1998 Colombo
Participatory Planning Workshop in Development of project Framework 27 - 30 Jun 1998 Kandy
Workshop on Buffer Zone Economic Development 28 - 29 Sep 1998 Wadduwa
Community Involvement/Mobilization and NGO Participation in Buffer Zone Development 23 Oct 1998 Colombo
PRA workshop - Panahadua Village 14-16 Dec 1999 Uda Walawe
PRA workshop - Palupitiya Village 18-20 Jan 2000 Wasgomuwa
PRA workshop - Mapalana Village 21-23 Jan 2000 Peak Wilderness
PRA workshop - Hinnukiriyawa Village 28-31 Jan 2000 Ritigala
PRA workshop - Gellella Village 1-3 Feb 2000 Flood Plains
PRA workshop - Pallemalala Village 2-4 Apr 2000 Bundala
PRA workshop - Seethagangula Village 2-4 Apr 2000 Peak Wilderness
PRA workshop - Pttipola Village 5-7 Apr 2000 Horton Plains
PRA workshop - Minihirigama Village 5-8 Apr 2000 Minneriya
Workshop on Wildlife Conservation Policy and Legislation 8 Jan 2000 Colombo
Workshop on Wildlife Conservation, PA Management and Sustainable Use 8 Feb 2000 Colombo

Since declaring the project effective, there have been five public discussions organized by the NGO sector, where ADB officials clarified the Project's objectives and scope.

The project document -- Report and Recommendations of the President to the Board Of Directors of ADB -- has been circulated upon request, including 30 hard copies to the Wildlife and Nature Protection Society.

 Top

Are there numerous versions of the project document?

No. The project's binding document is the Report and Recommendations of the President to the Board Of Directors of ADB and the corresponding Loan Agreement.

All Memorandum of Understandings preceding these documents are outdated and represent 'work in progress'.

Read the news releases on this project:

Was an Environmental Impact Assessment done for this project?

An initial environmental assessment undertaken during project preparation concluded that the project would be overwhelmingly beneficial from both an environmental and social perspective.

Adverse impacts due to development and implementation of ecotourism concession agreements were considered of potentially moderate significance. These concessions would be of a modest scale and would be monitored in accordance with an environmental management plan prepared in the case of each development, as required under the criteria of the National Environment Act.


© 2008 Asian Development Bank

Privacy | Terms of Use
 Top of page