Evaluation Resources

Results 1-10 of 1565

This topical working paper will look into the sustainability of water and other urban infrastructure and services operations, in particular relevant operational issues, and relationships and tradeoffs between affordability and efficiency, affordability and environmental and financial sustainability. It will distill lessons from ADB and other development institutions with significant involvement in the water and other urban infrastructure and services operations. This topical working paper will feed into the 2015 Annual Evaluation Review. 

This corporate evaluation study assesses the strategic relevance of technical assistance (TA) within ADB and how TA and the associated management processes within ADB can better contribute to development effectiveness. The evaluation also generates a series of findings and recommendations to guide ADB in its use of TA. 

Validates the completion report’s assessment of the program, which aimed to support budgetary requirements of Tonga at the time of the global economic crisis, designed to help Tonga stimulate the economy and continue with structural reforms to maintain stability, promote more equitable and sustainable growth, and create an economy that is more resilient to future shocks.IED overall assessment: Successful. 

Validates the completion report’s assessment of the project, which aimed to protect the natural resources of the Sanjiang Plain wetlands and their watersheds (biodiversity, water, and forests) from continued threats, promote their sustainable use through the integrated conservation and development of selected wetlands and forest areas of the Sanjiang Plain, and improve the well-being of local communities. IED overall assessment: Successful.

This report validates the extended annual review report’s assessment of the project. The Independent Evaluation Department agrees with the project’s overall assessment rating as highly successful.

This report validates the extended annual review report’s assessment of the project. The Independent Evaluation Department agrees with the project’s overall assessment rating as successful.

This report validates the extended annual review report’s assessment of the project. The  Independent Evaluation Department agrees with the project’s overall assessment rating as unsuccessful.

This report validates the extended annual review report’s assessment of the project. The Independent Evaluation Department differs with the project’s overall assessment rating and downgrades it to less than successful.

This report validates the extended annual review report’s assessment of the project. The Independent Evaluation Department disagrees with the project’s overall assessment rating and downgrades it to less than successful.

This report validates the extended annual review report’s assessment of the project. The Independent Evaluation Department agrees with the project’s overall assessment rating as highly successful.