Evaluation Resources

Results 1-10 of 69 for ADB funds and products

The Asian Development Bank reformed its technical assistance (TA) policy in 2008. Since then, TA performance has shown signs of improvement. The success rates of TA completion reports have improved since 2009, although these are self-evaluations and need to be interpreted with caution. More of ADB’s external stakeholders perceived ADB as an excellent source of knowledge on development issues

This Learning Curves summarizes the key findings and recommendations of the real-time evaluation of ADB’s multi-tranche financing facility. It examines the cost and benefits associated with the modality, by considering efficiency gains or cost reductions as well as gains in development effectiveness. It reviews whether the lessons or initial outcomes before the modality was mainstreamed led to any changes in policy for the facility or operating requirements to improve its effectiveness. It also provides insights into the future design of multi-tranche financing facility interventions.

ONGOING EVALUATION. This thematic evaluation study will assess the strategic relevance of technical assistance within ADB and look at how technical assistance can better contribute to development effectiveness. The study aims to generate findings and recommendations to guide ADB in its future use of technical assistance. 

ONGOING EVALUTION. The evaluation will examine ADB’s governance policies and plans and appraisal of its governance operations over the past decade.  By evaluating ADB’s governance experience and drawing on lessons and evidence from the wider global experience, the evaluation will provide guidance to strengthen the effectiveness of ADB’s future work in this area. The evaluation findings will feed directly into the 2014 midterm review of Asian Development Fund XI.

This technical assistance performance evaluation report covers six facility-type technical assistance projects approved by ADB for the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The report is focused on the working this facility-type technical assistance approach, how it evolved, its present status, and the contributions of subprojects to the government’s policy reforms and capacity development efforts. The report identifies lessons and offers recommendations to ADB on whether and how to plan and manage similar modes of engagement with governments in upper- and middle-income countries that have relatively strong in-country capacities.

On 15 January 2013, the Director General, Independent Evaluation department, received the following response from the Managing Director General on behalf of the Management on the Special Evaluation Study on Real-time Evaluation of the Multitranche Financing Facility.

This evaluation examines the costs and benefits associated with the multitranche financing facility modality, by considering efficiency gains or cost reductions as well as gains in development effectiveness. The evaluation reviews whether lessons or initial outcomes before it was mainstreamed led to any changes in policy for the facility or operating requirements to improve its effectiveness. The study also provides insights into the future design of multitranche financing facility interventions.

.

This study reviews the development effectiveness of the operations of the Asian Development Fund (ADF) approved during ADF VIII and ADF IX (2001–2008) and reports on progress in the first 2 years of implementing ADF X.

アジア開発基金(ADF)は、アジア開発銀行(ADB)における譲許的融資の主要窓口であり、ADBに加盟するアジア太平洋地域の開発途上国の貧困削減を支援している。財源はADBのドナー国からの拠出金で、1974年の創設以来4年ごとに増資を実施。現在は第9次増資(ADF X、2009〜2012年)にあたる。2001〜2010年に、ADBは29カ国に対して計200億ドルのADF融資および無償資金(グラント)を承認しており、バングラデシュ、ベトナム、パキスタン、アフガニスタン、ネパールが大型の資金提供を受けた。

This edition of Learning Lessons highlights the lessons learned from a decade of Asian Development Fund operations, and provides recommendations to guide future ADF operations by ADB.