Dams and Development
E-Paper Contents |
|
|
Distribution analysis- who benefits and who bears the cost?
WCD proposes more explicit analysis of who is likely to gains and who to lose from a project at the stages of assessing options and determining feasibility of a particular intervention (WCD Guideline #9).
A review of methods for distributional analysis was undertaken as part of the WCD knowledge base, 'Financial, Economic and Distributional Analysis', in response to the concern that:
'Unfortunately, neither cost-benefit analysis nor least cost analysis or multi-criteria analysis have the explicit objective of providing decision-makers with information about how different groups fare as a result of projects'.
The impacts to be assessed included:
- effects that can be priced and therefore assessed as monetary costs and benefits,
- effects that can be partially priced like environmental impacts,
- effects that can not be priced but yet can be assessed as a gain or a loss like empowerment changes, and
- effects for which even the direction of the impact is contestable, for example whether modernisation of traditional societies is a gain or a loss.
Five approaches to distributional analysis were identified, moving from the most direct and .economic. approach to the broadest assessment:
- Economic Distributional Analysis (EDA) - the distribution of economic costs and benefits of a project as measured in DCF and CBA;
- Economic Impact Analysis - the analysis of economic impacts of a project using a regional or macroeconomic model;
- Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (EIA and SIA) - these techniques can serve to identify project impacts that fall outside the scope of CBA and macroeconomic models, but that have important distributional consequences;
- Equity (or Poverty) Assessment - assessment of the impacts (in economic or non-economic terms) of projects on specific sub-populations/groups of concern; and
- Distributional Analysis - consideration of the full range of distributional impacts, regardless of whether they are financial, social, environmental or economic and whether they are assessed in a qualitative fashion, quantified in non-monetary terms, or valued in financial/economic terms.
Back
What benefits can be shared? | Next Secondary benefits |