| Project Name | Strengthening Disaster and Climate Risk Resilience in Urban Development in the Pacific | ||||
| Project Number | 46162-001 | ||||
| Country / Economy | Regional Fiji Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu |
||||
| Project Status | Closed | ||||
| Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Technical Assistance |
||||
| Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||
| Strategic Agendas | Environmentally sustainable growth Inclusive economic growth Regional integration |
||||
| Drivers of Change | Governance and capacity development Partnerships |
||||
| Sector / Subsector | Water and other urban infrastructure and services / Urban policy, institutional and capacity development |
||||
| Gender | |||||
| Description | As small island developing states, Pacific developing member countries (DMCs) are vulnerable to economic shocks, natural hazards and climate change, which pose a significant challenge to sustainable development and progress towards achievement of the Millennium Development Goals. Pacific DMCs are highly exposed to the adverse effects of climate change and natural hazards including floods, droughts, tropical cyclones, earthquakes, and tsunamis, and have a low capacity to manage the resulting risks. Climate change is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, and introduce new hazards such as sea-level rise and temperature changes. In early 2005, the Cook Islands faced five cyclones within 5 weeks - four of which were Category 5. The 2009 tsunami that hit Samoa caused high human losses and extensive damage to the country's infrastructure. The estimated cost of recovery was estimated at 22% of Samoa's GDP over a 3-4 year period. In April 2012, Fiji was affected by severe flooding, resulting in damages equivalent to around 1.5% of the country's GDP. At the same time, poorly planned development activities are increasing the exposure of Pacific DMCs to natural hazard and climate change-related events. The large concentration of people, infrastructure, enterprises, and public institutions within cities makes urban areas more vulnerable to natural disasters and climate change compared with rural areas. Urban centers in the region are also predominantly situated in hazard-prone locations such as in low-lying coastal areas that are exposed to flooding, sea-level rise, and storm surge. Pacific DMCs are rapidly urbanizing, and over half the population of Cook Islands, Fiji, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, and Tuvalu are now concentrated in urban areas. As the region's urban centers expand, there is growing unplanned encroachment into higher risk areas such as exposed shorelines or floodplains. As part of the Pacific Catastrophic Risk and Financing Initiative (PCRAFI), which was launched in 2007, ADB has been working with the World Bank and the Secretariat of the Pacific Community's Applied Geoscience and Technology Division (SPC/SOPAC). PCRAFI aims to provide Pacific DMCs with disaster risk modeling and assessment tools for enhanced disaster risk management, and financial solutions to increase their financial resilience to natural disasters and climate change. ADB's contribution to the development of the regional catastrophe insurance scheme included identifying and recording country-specific geographic information system (GIS) datasets of buildings (residential, commercial, and industrial), major infrastructure (such as roads, bridges, airports, and electricity), major crops, and population. About 80,000 buildings and major infrastructure were physically inspected. In addition, about 3 million buildings and other assets, mostly in rural areas, were inferred from satellite imagery. PCRAFI also developed the region's most comprehensive regional historical hazard catalogue (115,000 earthquake and 2,500 tropical cyclone events) and historical loss database for major disasters, as well as country-specific hazard models that simulate earthquakes and tropical cyclones. The partnership's outputs also include risk maps showing the geographic distribution of potential losses for each Pacific DMC as well as other visualization products of the risk assessments. This information is stored in the Pacific Risk Information System (PacRIS) housed at SPC/SOPAC and can be accessed through an open-source web-based platform. Progress in mainstreaming climate and disaster considerations into urban and sector development planning, which is critical for safeguarding social and economic development gains in the region, has been constrained by a lack of climate and hazard exposure information. As a result, there has been a tendency in Pacific DMCs to respond to the symptoms of natural disaster events through relief and reconstruction efforts, rather than dealing with the root causes, through better development planning. PacRIS contains information on the probability of hazard events occurring in a particular location, the value and ownership of assets threatened by natural disasters and climate change, as well as information about the likely impacts of such events, which is critical for disaster and climate resilient development planning. Pacific DMC officials also have limited capacity to analyze natural hazard and climate change information and apply it to development planning. Awareness and capacity building activities are therefore needed to enable Pacific DMCs and development partners to use this data to develop climate and disaster resilient policies, plans, programs, and projects. |
||||
| Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | ADB's Approach to Assisting the Pacific (2010-2014) identifies effective disaster management and risk reduction and climate change adaptation as critical to achieving sustainable growth in the region. | ||||
| Impact | Social and economic development in Pacific developing member countries (DMCs) is resilient to climate change and natural hazard events. | ||||
| Project Outcome | |
|---|---|
| Description of Outcome | Climate and disaster risk information is integrated into urban development and infrastructure planning in Pacific DMCs. |
| Progress Toward Outcome | In progress. Case studies for selected Pacific DMCs have been prepared to demonstrate how risk considerations can be assessed, and integrated into urban planning and management strategies. Development of training modules is underway. |
| Implementation Progress | |
| Description of Project Outputs | Integrated climate and disaster risk screening tools for planning are operational. Integrated tools for mainstreaming disaster and climate risks into urban and sector planning are shared with regional stakeholders. Pacific DMC planners apply newly acquired climate and disaster risk mainstreaming skills. |
| Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues) | Completed. Climate risk screening tools have been developed. Completed. Participation in targeted regional meetings and conferences to share TA outputs. Completed. During training sessions, Pacific DMC stakeholders applied tools to assess natural hazard risks in their respective countries. |
| Geographical Location | Regional |
| Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
|---|---|
| Environmental Aspects | |
| Involuntary Resettlement | |
| Indigenous Peoples | |
| Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
| During Project Design | A number of stakeholders provided input to inform TA design, these included: (i) regional organizations, (ii) national government agencies, and (iii) local government agencies. |
| During Project Implementation | A wide range of urban sector stakeholders have been involved in TA implementation activities. These include: (i) national government agencies, (ii) local government agencies, i.e. city councils, (iii) development partners, (iv) NGOs, and (v) the private sector. All of these stakeholders have been involved in the development of case studies to demonstrate the application of risk tools to promote more resilience urban development. The same stakeholders will also be targeted for training and awareness-raising activities during the next phase of TA implementation. |
| Business Opportunities | |
|---|---|
| Consulting Services | The TA will finance 30.5 person-months of international and national consulting services including: (i) team leader/risk specialist (international, 8 person-months, intermittent), (ii) urban planner (international, 3 person-months, intermittent), (iii) civil engineer (international, 1.5 person-months, intermittent), (iv) economist (international, 2 person-months, intermittent), (v) expert peer reviewer (international 2 person-months, intermittent), (vi) disaster risk management training specialist (international, 2 person-months, intermittent), and (vii) risk mapping specialist (international, 4 person-months, intermittent), and (viii) national coordinators (national, 2 x 3 person-months, intermittent). The team leader/risk specialist, urban planner, civil engineer, and economist will be recruited through a firm using the quality- and cost-based selection method using a 90% technical: 10% financial ratio. SPC/SOPAC will be contracted as a consulting firm on the basis of single-source selection in order to recruit the international disaster risk management training specialist and risk mapping specialist, and national coordinators in case study countries. SPC/SOPAC has the regional mandate for the provision of technical support to Pacific DMCs for disaster risk reduction and disaster management. SPC/SOPAC is also the regional custodian of the PacRIS database. The expert peer reviewer will be selected using individual consultant recruitment. All consultant recruitment will be carried out in accordance with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2010, as amended from time to time). Disbursements under the TA will be done in accordance with ADB's Technical Assistance Disbursement Handbook (2010, as amended from time to time). |
| Responsible ADB Officer | Woodruff, Allison |
| Responsible ADB Department | Pacific Department |
| Responsible ADB Division | Urban, Social Development & Public Management Division, PARD |
| Executing Agencies |
Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines |
| Timetable | |
|---|---|
| Concept Clearance | 30 May 2012 |
| Fact Finding | 08 Jun 2012 to 13 Jun 2012 |
| MRM | - |
| Approval | 05 Dec 2012 |
| Last Review Mission | - |
| Last PDS Update | 31 Mar 2016 |
| Milestones | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
| Original | Revised | Actual | |||
| 05 Dec 2012 | - | 05 Dec 2012 | 02 Jan 2015 | 31 Mar 2016 | 14 Jun 2016 |
| Financing Plan/TA Utilization | Cumulative Disbursements | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADB | Cofinancing | Counterpart | Total | Date | Amount | |||
| Gov | Beneficiaries | Project Sponsor | Others | |||||
| 0.00 | 650,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 650,000.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 613,052.97 |