Cambodia : Strengthening Resettlement and Income Restoration Implementation
The impact of the TA will be enhanced capacity of the government to effectively implement resettlement activities in transport projects in Cambodia. The outcome will be enhanced institutional and staff capacity of the IRC to improve the functioning of the GRM, implement resettlement programs, and implement the EIRP in a sustained and sustainable manner.
Southeast Asia Department
Request for information
|Project Name||Strengthening Resettlement and Income Restoration Implementation|
|Country / Economy||Cambodia
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Governance and capacity development
|Sector / Subsector||
Transport / Rail transport (non-urban)
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||No gender elements|
|Description||The impact of the TA will be enhanced capacity of the government to effectively implement resettlement activities in transport projects in Cambodia. The outcome will be enhanced institutional and staff capacity of the IRC to improve the functioning of the GRM, implement resettlement programs, and implement the EIRP in a sustained and sustainable manner.|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||The TA will support the implementation of some of the remedial actions intended to address the decision of the ADB Board of Directors to address the recommendations of the Compliance Review Panel final report. In 2014, 11 missions have been conducted for the implementation of remedial actions. During these missions, requisite information for TA processing has been gathered.|
|Impact||Enhanced capacity of the government to effectively implement resettlement activities in transport projects in Cambodia|
|Description of Outcome||Enhanced institutional and staff capacity of the IRC to improve the functioning of the grievance redress mechanism (GRM), implement resettlement programs, and implement the expanded income restoration program (EIRP) in a sustained and sustainable manner|
|Progress Toward Outcome||The Government developed a time-bound and verifiable action plan for capacity building which included hands-on training to all staff connected with GRM. A manual for the GRM setting out step by step procedures for entertaining, hearing and deciding grievances was developed. The income restoration programs for the relocated household and was started in June 2016 and was completed in October 2018.|
|Description of Project Outputs||
1. Strategies are developed to improve the functioning of the GRM
2. Strategies are developed to build institutional and staff capacity of the IRC
3. The EIRP is made more sustainable
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)||
A national EIRP coordinator who supervised the implementation of the EIRP component was engaged under the TA assisted by 4 four community organizers. An international firm, Cufa, started its services in January 2016 and was completed on 30 November 2019. Cufa''s assistance included capacity building and institutional interventions for self-help groups (SHG); monitoring and auditing of SHG financial records; reviewing and recommending necessary changes to policies and procedures; and provision of training and training support in the preparation of financial reports. The capacity of the SHGs has greatly improved. It is expected that the SHGs may develop into sustainable institutions and eventually savings group.
The Government has approved national level of guidelines for Project-level Grievance Redress Mechanism which detail procedures for submission, receiving and redressing complaints along with an Individual Complaint Form and a template for Register of Complaints. These documents are part of Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement Standard Operation Procedures for Externally financed projects in Cambodia. By June 2015, the detailed GRM procedures, guidelines and training materials were completed and each of GRM committee member has been given a copy of the manual. Training on GRM for IRC staff has been rolled out for all provinces targeting all the grievance redress levels that built capacity of grievance redress committees.
The Government conducted internal retreats for IRC, all staff of RD-MEF and the Gen. Department. The challenges, areas for improvement, and priorities in capacity building were identified.The Government developed a time-bound and verifiable action plan for capacity building. Internal workshops were held to share experiences gained from Thailand study visit conducted in February 2014.Several capacity-building retreats, public engagement training and learning visits abroad have been conducted by IRC using its own funds. The Government recruited consultants to provide hands-on training to all staff connected with GRM. The lessons learned are being mainstreamed into its work and they are being applied in projects funded by other donors as well.
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design||EIRP improvements for institutional strengthening and capacity building of self-help groups (SHGs) designed in consultation with SHGs.|
|During Project Implementation||Quarterly progress reports publicly disclosed and quarterly consultation meetings held with community representatives and NGOs.EIRP activities delivered through community groups (self-help groups) assisted by CUFA.|
The CDTA recruited 1 international consultant and 4 national consultants for a total of about 7 person-months international consultant inputs and 32 person-months national consultant inputs through individual consultants on an intermittent basis. Recruitment of consultants was done in accordance with ADB Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2013, as amended from time to time).
The CDTA also engaged an NGO (firm) for about 10 person-months on an intermittent basis to assist in building capacity of the affected households including self-help groups in financial management and microfinance development.
|Responsible ADB Officer||Sakai, Tsuneyuki|
|Responsible ADB Department||Southeast Asia Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Transport and Communications Division, SERD|
Asian Development Bank
6 ADB Avenue,
Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines
|Concept Clearance||26 Sep 2014|
|Fact Finding||10 Oct 2014 to 27 Oct 2014|
|Approval||15 Dec 2014|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|Last PDS Update||30 Mar 2020|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|15 Dec 2014||12 Jan 2015||12 Jan 2015||31 Jan 2017||14 Dec 2019||23 Jun 2020|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|1,400,000.00||0.00||70,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||1,470,000.00||17 Jun 2022||923,372.40|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
|Contract Title||Approval Number||Contract Date||Contractor | Address||Executing Agency||Total Contract Amount (US$)||Contract Amount Financed by ADB (US$)|
|Capacity Development||Technical Assistance 8810||14 Dec 2015||Cufa Ltd (Australia) | Suite 704A, Alfred Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia||Asian Development Bank||178,000.00||—|
|Capacity Development||Technical Assistance 8810||02 Nov 2016||CUFA Ltd (Australia) | Suite 704A Alfred Street North Sydney, NSW 2060 Australia [email protected]; [email protected]||Asian Development Bank||253,900.00||—|
None currently available.