India: Preparing the Integrated Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Project - Assam (Phase 2): Processing and Institutional Strengthening
The TA will help ensure implementation readiness of the Assam Integrated Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Investment Program.
South Asia Department
Request for information
- Technical Assistance
- Agriculture, natural resources and rural development
|Project Name||Preparing the Integrated Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Project - Assam (Phase 2): Processing and Institutional Strengthening|
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Environmentally sustainable growth
Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Governance and capacity development
|Sector / Subsector||
Agriculture, natural resources and rural development / Rural flood protection - Rural water policy, institutional and capacity development
Water and other urban infrastructure and services / Urban flood protection
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||No gender elements|
|Description||The TA will help ensure implementation readiness of the Assam Integrated Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Investment Program.|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||
The Brahmaputra river system is the fourth largest in the world in flood discharge. While it serves as a lifeline for North Eastern states, frequent flooding and severe erosion have major adverse effects on the economy and ecology, threatening key urban centers, basic infrastructure, industrial and agriculture areas, and natural heritage sites. They remain a major cause of poverty in NE states, with devastating impacts leading to high morbidity, forced seclusion, loss of livestock, crops and assets, and cessation of availability of basic services. Addressing the problems requires a comprehensive and cost-effective flood and erosion mitigation management strategy and programs, with a balanced combination of structural and nonstructural measures suitable in the context of NE states. Along with this, policy and institutional basis needs to be strengthened to support this end, with an integrated and basin-wide perspective. The Government's 11th Five-year Plan puts priority to provide appropriate protection measures of the flood-prone areas. The draft CPS for India notes that the water sector is of fundamental importance in promoting economic growth, poverty reduction, and environmental sustainability, and advocates integrated water resources management (IWRM) as a tool to these ends. It also focuses on poverty reduction of disadvantaged areas, especially in the poor NE states.
Against this background, the Assam Integrated Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Project (the Project) aims to promote economic growth and poverty reduction by enhancing the security against flood and riverbank erosion damages across the state. This is pursued through provision of comprehensive structural and nonstructural flood and riverbank erosion risk management (FRERM) programs. Structural measures will primarily focus on areas with vital economic and national interests in the Brahmaputra River. An adaptive, process approach is taken to provide options most suitable and cost-effective to local conditions, e.g., flood protection and riverbank protection along the reaches of vital interests, and more adaptive measures in rural areas such as strategic retirement of dykes and flood proofing. These will be effectively combined with appropriate non-structural measures, including flood and riverbank erosion forecasting, warning, and management systems, disaster prone area zoning, and safety net to the most vulnerable affected poor.
To prepare the Project, a PPTA was implemented for Assam (TA No. 4896-IND). It has prepared a MFF project package including three appraised subprojects, and actions and programs for policy and institutional development including the sector roadmap, through feasibility studies and sector and institutional assessments including diagnostic analyses to define capacity development programs. The TA also provided advice to the Assam state government's (ASG's) preparation process of its draft State Water Policy, which is in the advanced stage. Nevertheless, in effectively initiating the Project, there remains a large gap between the present and required policy and institutional framework and capacities of the executing agencies, which remain largely ad hoc and structure-oriented, with insufficient management systems to respond to the dynamic river environments in an adaptive, efficient, and sustainable manner. Capacities to pursue comprehensive FRERM programs in consultations with diverse stakeholders with effective linkages with the State's disaster management systems are also limited. There is also a need for providing immediate capacity strengthening of the relevant project institutions for the timely Project initiation and implementation. The subject TA, which is proposed as the 2nd phase of the PPTA, is needed to provide critical capacity strengthening support to these ends.
|Impact||The TA will enhance security against flooding and riverbank erosion and induced economic growth in the state's vital areas of economic interests (urban and productive rural centers, basic physical infrastructure, and natural heritage sites).|
|Description of Outcome||The TA outcome includes (i) improved policy environment, planning framework, and capacities of WRD and other agencies to operationalize IWRM integrated FRERM with set reform actions; and (ii) advanced management capacities and readiness to initiate the NEIFREMP (Assam) in terms of DPR preparation and clearance, project office establishment, staff assignment and capacity development, implementation materials and management systems, and progress in mobilization of consultants and in procurement.|
|Progress Toward Outcome||TA is substantially completed.|
|Description of Project Outputs||
Improved policy, planning, and institutional framework for integrated FREM, including progress in the preparation of state water policies, plans, institutional restructuring; and a better interagency coordination for FREM and other natural disaster management.
Strengthened capacities of WRD in Arunachal Pradesh and Assam with establishment of sound FREM management systems.
Improved maintenance funding systems through mobilziation of flood cess and other resources.
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design||Stakeholder workshops involving the Assam State Government (ASG), the Government of India, the consultants, and ADB will be organized at the inception, midterm, and draft final stages. Seminars and workshops will also be organized with the ASG taff and other stakeholders concerned.|
|During Project Implementation||During the completed PPTA, two state-level workshops were organized (one workshop completed in Dec. 2007, and another in June 2008), with the invitation of representatives of the Government of India, ASG, local governments, and local research institutions including universities, along with the advocacy NGOs active in social and environmental safeguards agendas in the NE region. The third workshop was also organized in Februry 2009 at the time of the loan fact-finding mission with similar setup. Given the highly dynamic morphological behavior of the Brahmaputra, the TA's approach, viz., improving the existing flood management infrastructure with an incremental manner adaptive to the natural processes, was supported. NGOs stressed that (i) the ownership and capacity of WRD should be strengthened to institutionalize the approach with stakeholder participation and accountability, which is presently lacking, (ii) careful environmental and social impact assessments should be undertaken with sufficient stakeholder consultation, and (iii) sufficient attention should be provided to enhance the livelihoods of the most vulnerable people who are mostly located outside the flood embankment systems.|
|Consulting Services||All consultant will be engaged individually by ADB in consultation with the Assam State Government and the Government of India. All recruitment will follow ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (April 2006, as amended from time to time) and other arrangements satisfactory to ADB for selecting and engaging national consultants.|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Yokoyama, Kenichi|
|Responsible ADB Department||South Asia Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Environment, Natural Resources & Agriculture Division, SARD|
Water Resource Department
Government of Madhya Pradesh
Bhopal, India 462 001
|Concept Clearance||11 Jun 2008|
|Fact Finding||22 Jun 2008 to 02 Jul 2008|
|Approval||26 Sep 2008|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|PDS Creation Date||21 Oct 2008|
|Last PDS Update||21 Aug 2011|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|26 Sep 2008||24 Nov 2008||24 Nov 2008||31 Dec 2010||31 Aug 2011||-|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|150,000.00||750,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||900,000.00||29 Sep 2021||893,036.07|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
|Title||Document Type||Document Date|
|Preparing the Integrated Flood and Riverbank Erosion Risk Management Project– Assam (Phase 2): Processing and Institutional Strengthening||Technical Assistance Reports||Sep 2008|
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
No tenders for this project were found.
No contracts awarded for this project were found
None currently available.