Nepal : Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project - Additional Financing
ADB is helping Nepal improve transport connectivity, infrastructure, and livelihoods in 18 poor hill and mountain districts. The project will also strengthen the decentralized management of rural infrastructure.
Project Details
-
Project Officer
Subedi, Laxmi P.
South Asia Department
Request for information -
Country/Economy
Nepal -
Modality
-
Sector
- Transport
Related Projects
Project Name | Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project - Additional Financing | ||||||||||||||||
Project Number | 38426-023 | ||||||||||||||||
Country / Economy | Nepal |
||||||||||||||||
Project Status | Closed | ||||||||||||||||
Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Grant Loan |
||||||||||||||||
Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||||||||||||||
Strategic Agendas | Inclusive economic growth |
||||||||||||||||
Drivers of Change | Gender Equity and Mainstreaming Governance and capacity development Partnerships |
||||||||||||||||
Sector / Subsector | Transport / Road transport (non-urban) |
||||||||||||||||
Gender | Effective gender mainstreaming | ||||||||||||||||
Description | The impact of the project will be reduced rural poverty in 18 poor and remote hill and mountain districts. The project outcome will be widened access to social services and economic opportunities. The project outcome will be achieved through the following outputs:(i) rural livelihood improved; (ii) capacity and decentralized local governance enhanced; (iii) rural transport infrastructure extended and maintained; and (iv) project management improved. Output 1: Rural Livelihood Improved The project will improve community infrastructure in the 18 districts. This will include 90 school buildings and health posts, 36 foot/mule/link trails, 54 water supply and irrigation schemes, 10 micro-hydropower, 8 rural market places, 10 ropeways, and other community infrastructure. The project will provide livelihood related skills training to 3,000 beneficiaries from the project impact zones, of which at least 40% are women and 60%, are from poor and excluded groups. In nine pilot districts, the project will work with existing savings and credit groups, and assist BGs willing to form themselves into formal Savings and Credit Cooperatives and facilitate their access to credit from existing institutional suppliers. Output 2: Capacity and Decentralized Local Governance Enhanced The project will improve district and national capacity building to promote improved decentralized governance. The thrust will be on establishing the capacity for sustainable management of rural road networks, strengthening the decentralized management of rural infrastructure, and raising central capacity to support local government bodies. Output 3: Rural Transport Infrastructure Extended and Maintained The project will improve 260 kilometers (km) of rural roads in the 18 districts (200 km new and 60 km upgrading). Rural roads of 1,200 km will be maintained in the 18 districts and 6,500 meters of trail bridges will be constructed. The implementation of the road sub-projects will employ labor-based equipment-supported methods, and works performed by BGs will be promoted over construction by contractors. Only those civil works that cannot be executed by the communities may be awarded on the basis of local competitive bidding to contractors. Output 4: Project Management Improved Technical support to project implementation will be provided through a Central Implementation Support Consultant (CISC) and District Implementation Support Consultant (DISCs) in each of the 18 project districts. |
||||||||||||||||
Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | The road networks are the major modes of transportation in the country because of its widespread mountainous terrain and difficult weather conditions. Pervasive poverty in the hill and mountain districts is linked to the lack of road connectivity, and commensurate high transport costs, which discourage the mobility of people, and movement of goods and services within and outside the regions. The majority of settlements in hilly and mountainous areas are not accessible by motorized vehicles; they are cut off from the road network, and thus face constraints of limited access to food supplies, health and education facilities, and other essential services. In these areas, rural transport is largely based on a trail-based system of foot trails, mule tracks, and trail bridges. Poor road connectivity hampers realizing economic opportunities in the remote and mountainous districts, adversely affecting the country's economic potential. | ||||||||||||||||
Impact | Reduced rural poverty in 18 very poor remote hill and mountain districts |
Project Outcome | |
---|---|
Description of Outcome | Widened access to social services and economic opportunities |
Progress Toward Outcome | (i) Average annual income per household has reached to NRs. 186,311 which is higher than targeted annual 10% increment from NRs. 69,500; (ii) Transportation cost for people and goods reduced to NRs 10.4/km per person from NRs 18/km per person and to NRs 281/tons/km from NRs 491/tons/km respectively; (iii) Freight volume has increased to 0.645 tons/capita/in 2016, which is more than targeted annual 20% increment from 0.116 tons/capita/year; (iv) Per capita person trip to district HQ reached 16 from 4.39 trips of base year 2010, which is more than targeted annual 10% increment; and (v) A total of 9,205 public utilities have come up in subproject area through which 639,764 persons were getting better access to social services. |
Implementation Progress | |
Description of Project Outputs | 1. Rural livelihood improved 2. Capacity building and decentralized local governance enhanced 3. Rural transport infrastructure extended and maintained 4. Project management improved |
Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues) | CISC, NNGO and DISCs in 8 SDC supported districts in place. Individual consultants were mobilized instead of firm for 10 districts due to the case was in court. 21 nos. of four wheel vehicles and 37 nos. of motorcycles were purchased and supplied to districts. Other equipment items were also procured as per the need. A common financial management system was developed for the Ministry of Local Development, DDCs and DOLIDAR. Gender desk has established in DOLIDAR. 58 central and district level staff participated regional study tour. Most of the subprojects selected are those indicated in PAM. New roads in Gorkha, Lamjung, Bajhang, Kalikot and Humla are proposed on the basis of districts priority based on DTMP. DDC, DTO have demonstrated improved capacity to implement infrastructure subprojects, and to deliver development services. District level project staffs from DDC and district technical office has been capacitated in all aspects of development project planning, management, and implementation. The project constructed 552 community infrastructures schemes, slightly higher than the revised target of 550 infrastructures. This is in practice. The workers are aware of it and monitored by DISC & DPO during payment to BG members. A total of 7,575 beneficiaries trained in livelihood related skills of which 42.91% were women and 60.82% were from poor and excluded groups. Local NGO has been mobilized for microfinance access facilitation in 9 pilot project districts. Local NGO has completed orientation training related to microfinance access for BGs, existing saving and credit groups. Exposure visit for members of saving credit group organized. A total of 3,117 orientation, awareness raising, and consultation events were conducted in which 1,08,972 persons 41% women and 68% disadvantaged groups participated. Constructed 527 km road versus 555 Km revised target and rehabilitated 249 km road against revised target of 255 km. The achievement is 96% of overall road construction and rehabilitation target. A total of 29,314 running meter trail bridges completed, which was higher than revised target 20,500 running meter. The trail bridge construction target was increased to 26,600 running meter in both investment's MTR District road maintenance of 1,273 km has been carried out. This activity was dropped by MTR as recommended in assessment report. |
Geographical Location | Baglung, Baitadi, Bajhang, Bajura, Darchula, Dolpa, Gorkha, Humla, Jajarkot, Jumla, Kalikot, Lamjung, Mugu, Myagdi, Okhaldhunga, Ramechhap, Solukhumbu, Taplejung |
Safeguard Categories | |
---|---|
Environment | B |
Involuntary Resettlement | B |
Indigenous Peoples | B |
Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
---|---|
Environmental Aspects | The overall project is category B in accordance with ADBs Safeguard Policy Statement (2009). The executing agency and implementing agencies prepared initial environmental examinations, including environmental management plans (EMPs), for the sample subprojects. The environmental assessment and review framework was revised in accordance with ADBs Safeguard Policy Statement. The framework sets out the requirements for project screening and classification, subproject selection, information disclosure to, and consultation with, the affected people, environmental assessment, EMP development and implementation, and monitoring and reporting. The initial environmental examinations found the planned subprojects to have only small and localized adverse impacts on the environment, which can be managed by the mitigation measures proposed in the EMPs. |
Involuntary Resettlement | Most subprojects involve land acquisition and involuntary resettlement, but the involuntary resettlement impact is not considered significant. The resettlement framework has been revised and updated in compliance with ADBs Safeguard Policy Statement. The resettlement framework includes a due diligence procedure to ensure those donating land will not be impoverished through donation. Any donation will be confirmed through a written record, including a no-coercion clause verified by an independent external party. Land owners not conforming to the donation eligibility criteria will be offered compensation at replacement cost and/or assistance so that they maintain the same or better income and livelihood status. All subprojects has been screened early in the project cycle. Any subproject involving involuntary resettlement impacts, has prepared resettlement plan based on the detailed design, disclosed to those affected persons, and submitted for ADB approval in accordance with the resettlement framework. |
Indigenous Peoples | The indigenous peoples planning framework has also been revised in compliance with ADBs Safeguard Policy Statement, with special assistance measures for indigenous peoples and other vulnerable groups. Considering the nature and scale of the subprojects, any negative impact on indigenous peoples is expected to be limited to a few involuntary resettlements and land acquisition cases. In addition, a gender equality and social inclusion plan contains specific actions favorable to indigenous peoples. Three indigenous people plan has been prepared and implemented for the subproject where impact on indigenous people were noticed. |
Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
During Project Design | |
During Project Implementation | The road subprojects are being selected from the priority list of the district transport master plan (DTMP). The DTMP is being prepared through consultative process. During selection of road alignment project beneficiaries are being consulted. Similary, the community infrastructures are selected with wider consultation with beneficiaries. The consulation has been carried out by DPO, DISC and VWRCC in a participatory way. During the preparation of safeguards plans the affected persons and beneficiaries were consulted. |
Responsible ADB Officer | Subedi, Laxmi P. |
Responsible ADB Department | South Asia Department |
Responsible ADB Division | Nepal Resident Mission |
Executing Agencies |
Department of Local Infrastructure Shreemahal, Pulchowk, Lalitpur, Nepal |
Timetable | |
---|---|
Concept Clearance | 09 Aug 2010 |
Fact Finding | 15 Jun 2011 to 30 Jun 2011 |
MRM | 18 Aug 2011 |
Approval | 21 Dec 2011 |
Last Review Mission | - |
Last PDS Update | 19 Jun 2019 |
Grant 0267-NEP
Milestones | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
Original | Revised | Actual | |||
31 Oct 2011 | 01 Feb 2012 | 23 Apr 2012 | 30 Jun 2017 | - | 04 Apr 2019 |
Financing Plan | Grant Utilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Amount in US$ million) | Date | ADB | Others | Net Percentage | |
Project Cost | 28.45 | Cumulative Contract Awards | |||
ADB | 7.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 6.35 | 0.00 | 95% |
Counterpart | 14.39 | Cumulative Disbursements | |||
Cofinancing | 7.06 | 17 Jun 2022 | 6.35 | 0.00 | 95% |
Status of Covenants | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Sector | Safeguards | Social | Financial | Economic | Others |
Rating | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | Satisfactory |
Loan 2796-NEP
Milestones | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
Original | Revised | Actual | |||
31 Oct 2011 | 01 Feb 2012 | 23 Apr 2012 | 30 Jun 2017 | - | 05 Apr 2019 |
Financing Plan | Loan Utilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Amount in US$ million) | Date | ADB | Others | Net Percentage | |
Project Cost | 18.00 | Cumulative Contract Awards | |||
ADB | 18.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 14.76 | 0.00 | 100% |
Counterpart | 0.00 | Cumulative Disbursements | |||
Cofinancing | 0.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 14.76 | 0.00 | 100% |
Status of Covenants | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Sector | Safeguards | Social | Financial | Economic | Others |
Rating | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | Satisfactory |
Loan 8257-NEP
Milestones | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
Original | Revised | Actual | |||
21 Dec 2011 | 01 Jun 2012 | 06 Feb 2013 | 28 Feb 2017 | 31 May 2018 | 11 Sep 2019 |
Financing Plan | Loan Utilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Amount in US$ million) | Date | ADB | Others | Net Percentage | |
Project Cost | 20.00 | Cumulative Contract Awards | |||
ADB | 0.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 0.00 | 19.67 | 100% |
Counterpart | 0.00 | Cumulative Disbursements | |||
Cofinancing | 20.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 0.00 | 19.67 | 100% |
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
Title | Document Type | Document Date |
---|---|---|
Nepal: Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project | Validations of Project Completion Reports | Aug 2020 |
Related Publications
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
Nepal: Will Development Come on a Bus in the Most Beautiful Place on Earth?
Binita Shah Khadka from ADB's Nepal Resident Mission makes the long trek west to Rara Lake in remote Mugu district where a new road is expected to bring development to some of the country's poorest communities.
Tenders
Contracts Awarded
Procurement Plan
Title | Document Type | Document Date |
---|---|---|
Decentralized Rural Infrastructure and Livelihood Project - Additional Financing | Procurement Plans | Jul 2013 |