Kazakhstan : CAREC Transport Corridor 1 (Zhambyl Oblast Section) Investment Program - Tranche 3
ADB is helping Kazakhstan upgrade a key road that will contribute to increasing domestic and regional trade. The third project will improve 118 kilometers of the highway in Zhambyl Oblast. This will be part of the Central Asian Regional Economic Cooperation Transport Corridor I, running from Khorgos city through Almaty and Shymkent to the Russian Federation's western border.
Project Details
-
Project Officer
Capulong, Ma. Virginita A.
Central and West Asia Department
Request for information -
Country/Economy
Kazakhstan -
Modality
-
Sector
- Transport
Related Projects
Project Name | CAREC Transport Corridor 1 (Zhambyl Oblast Section) Investment Program - Tranche 3 | ||||||||
Project Number | 41121-043 | ||||||||
Country / Economy | Kazakhstan |
||||||||
Project Status | Closed | ||||||||
Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Loan |
||||||||
Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||||||
Strategic Agendas | Inclusive economic growth |
||||||||
Drivers of Change | Gender Equity and Mainstreaming Governance and capacity development Partnerships Private sector development |
||||||||
Sector / Subsector | Transport / Road transport (non-urban) |
||||||||
Gender | Some gender elements | ||||||||
Description | Project 3 constructed 117.7-km road sections in total. ADB financed the (i) construction of a new 80-km Otar-Blagoveshchenka road section (Km 162-260); and (ii) rehabilitation of 10.3-km existing asphalt concrete road, and construction of a new 7.4-km asphalt concrete bypass approach road to the Kyrgyz border. JICA jointly cofinanced the construction of 20-km Kulan bypass road section (km 383-404). | ||||||||
Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | Roads are a key element of Kazakhstan's transport system. They play an important role in providing access to rural areas, and facilitating transit traffic and in-country transport movement. However, much of the road network is in poor condition--about 60% of the national roads require major rehabilitation and proper maintenance. Moreover, the feeder road network serving the rural population is not fully developed; and is characterized by poor conditions and a low service level, especially during wintertime. This results in high transport costs. The road sector has long-standing bottlenecks: (i) the network is incomplete, and in some sections in bad condition; (ii) truck overloading is frequent, cutting into the economic life of road assets; (iii) revenues from transit are low, affecting cost recovery and reinvestment capabilities; (iv) inefficient cross-border procedures increase the burden on trade and traders, and raise the cost of doing business; (v) weak road sector planning affects sound investment sequencing; and (vi) project development and project management shortcomings create inefficiencies, high costs, and bad governance. These gaps translate into higher-than-average transport costs. They also hamper regional cooperation and integration opportunities, and ultimately the country's competitiveness. The Government of Kazakhstan's Western Europe-Western PRC Corridor (the Corridor) Development Program intends to remove these constraints to improve the road sections in the Kazakhstan territory of CAREC Transport Corridor I, which total 2,715 km running from Khorgos through Almaty and Shymkent to the Russian Federation's western border. The Corridor Development Program will improve the existing road and construct bypasses and new alignments to make the Corridor suitable for international traffic. The Government sought assistance from the international financial institutions to finance sections along the Corridor. ADB, with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) finance 470 km in Zhambyl Oblast. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the World Bank finance 102 km and 1,062 km, respectively. Teaming up with IDB and JICA, ADB committed to improve 470 km in Zhambyl Oblast through the multitranche financing facility (MFF). On 13 January 2009, the Government and ADB entered into a framework financing agreement (FFA) for the MFF, with an aggregate principal amount not exceeding the equivalent of $700 million. ADB approved the MFF on 12 November 2008. ADB approved the first tranche for $340 million on 30 December 2008, which was reduced to $225 million, the second tranche of $187 million on 7 October 2009, and the third tranche of $173 million in 15 November 2010. |
||||||||
Impact | Contribution to sustainable economic development |
Project Outcome | |
---|---|
Description of Outcome | Development of an efficient transport network in Zhambyl Oblast |
Progress Toward Outcome | The completed three road sections increased average traffic volume, reduced average travel time, reduced vehicle operating costs, and reduced the road crash rate. |
Implementation Progress | |
Description of Project Outputs | 118 km of road section in Zhambyl Oblast of the CAREC Transport Corridor 1 reconstructed |
Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues) | The construction at Kulan Bypass (Km 383-404) was completed in 2013 and defects were rectified by the end of the defects notification period in November 2015. The construction at Otar-Blagoveschenka road sections (Km 162-260) and Korday-KGZ border road section (Km 0- 17.7) were substantially completed in November 2014. Defects are currently being rectified until the end of the defects notification period in November 2016. All road sections were open to traffic after substantial completion. |
Geographical Location | Bayzak District, Blagoveshchenka, Georgiyevka, Korday, Kulan, Lugovoe Audany, Merke Audany, Taraz |
Safeguard Categories | |
---|---|
Environment | A |
Involuntary Resettlement | B |
Indigenous Peoples | C |
Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
---|---|
Environmental Aspects | Each contractor prepared site-specific environmental management plans (EMPs) following the original EMP since the project covers three separate sections. The construcition supervision consultant monitored the EMP implementation. Bi-annual environmental monitoring reports were prepared and disclosed at ADB website. The EA and ADB closely monitored and assessed any environment issue along the project roads during project implementation, through review missions, consultations and meetings, progress reports and bi-annual environment monitoring reports. |
Involuntary Resettlement | The Project involved land acquisition and resettlement (LAR) along the project roads. The land acquisition and resettlement plan (LARP) was prepared and disclosed in 2010. Most of the LAR-related activities were completed and verified by an external monitor. The external monitoring report was also disclosed in 2012. A supplemental LARP was prepared for the Kainar cloverleaf interchange. The works at this interchange were suspended until the supplemental LARP was implemented. The EA and ADB closely monitored and assessed any LAR issue along the project roads during project implementation, through review missions, consultations and meetings, progress reports and bi-annual LAR monitoring reports. |
Indigenous Peoples | There was no impact on indigenous peoples. |
Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
During Project Design | The Committee of Roads under the Ministry of Transport and Communications, (Implemention Agency) conducted consultations with raion akimats and project-affected peoples (APs) since 2007 for designing the project. Consultations were again conducted in May 2009 and March 2010 in preparing the land acquisition and resettlement plan (LARP). Brochures in Kazakh and Russian were distributed to APs, and LARPs were posted in both the ADB and Committee of Roads' websites. |
During Project Implementation | Public consultations were held during implementation. Grievance redress mechanism was set up in 2010. The establishment of Coordination Liaison Group (CLG) strengthened the grievance mechanism. A CLG Coordinator was engaged to monitor and report complaints, and facilitate resolution. |
Business Opportunities | |
---|---|
Consulting Services | Recruitment of consulting services followed ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants. A consulting firm for construction supervision was selected and engaged using the quality- and cost-based selection (QCBS) method with a standard quality-cost ratio of 80:20, and full technical proposal. |
Procurement | Procurement of civil works financed by both ADB and JICA loans followed ADB's Procurement Guidelines. Three civil works contracts over $3 million were procured through international competitive bidding (ICB) procedure without pre-qualification of bidders. ADB's prior review procedures were followed. The safeguards requirements under ADB's Safeguards Policy Statement (2009) and relevant sections of the ADB's Anticorruption Policy were included in the bidding document and contracts. The ADB Management has approved advance action for procuring civil works to be financed by ADB under the Investment Program, including this Project. MOTC has been informed that approval of advance contracting does not commit ADB to finance the Investment Program or any project. |
Responsible ADB Officer | Capulong, Ma. Virginita A. |
Responsible ADB Department | Central and West Asia Department |
Responsible ADB Division | Transport and Communications Division, CWRD |
Executing Agencies |
Ministry of Industry and Infrastructure Development formerly "Ministry of Investments and Developments" Mr. Ascar Mamin [email protected] 32/1 Kabanbay Batyr Ave., Astana |
Timetable | |
---|---|
Concept Clearance | 19 Feb 2008 |
Fact Finding | - |
MRM | - |
Approval | 15 Nov 2010 |
Last Review Mission | - |
PDS Creation Date | 27 Apr 2010 |
Last PDS Update | 19 Sep 2016 |
Loan 2697-KAZ
Milestones | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
Original | Revised | Actual | |||
15 Nov 2010 | 15 Dec 2010 | 15 Jun 2011 | 31 Dec 2013 | 31 Dec 2014 | 22 Apr 2015 |
Financing Plan | Loan Utilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Amount in US$ million) | Date | ADB | Others | Net Percentage | |
Project Cost | 213.00 | Cumulative Contract Awards | |||
ADB | 173.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 164.67 | 0.00 | 100% |
Counterpart | 40.00 | Cumulative Disbursements | |||
Cofinancing | 0.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 164.67 | 0.00 | 100% |
Status of Covenants | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Sector | Safeguards | Social | Financial | Economic | Others |
Rating | - | Partly satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | - | Satisfactory |
Loan 8251-KAZ
Milestones | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
Original | Revised | Actual | |||
31 May 2010 | 23 Aug 2010 | 15 Jul 2011 | 15 Jul 2020 | - | 01 Aug 2016 |
Financing Plan | Loan Utilization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total (Amount in US$ million) | Date | ADB | Others | Net Percentage | |
Project Cost | 68.00 | Cumulative Contract Awards | |||
ADB | 0.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 0.00 | 68.33 | 100% |
Counterpart | 0.00 | Cumulative Disbursements | |||
Cofinancing | 68.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 0.00 | 68.33 | 100% |
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
Title | Document Type | Document Date |
---|---|---|
CAREC Transport Corridor 1 (Zhambyl Oblast Section) [Western Europe–Western People’s Republic of China International Transit Corridor] Investment Program and Taraz Bypass Project (Kazakhstan) | Project Performance Evaluation Reports | Oct 2020 |
Казахстан:Инвестиционная программа по транспортному коридору 1 ЦАРЭС (участок в Жамбылской области) [Международный транзитный коридор Западная Европа - Запад Китайской народной республики] и проект объездной дороги г. Тараз | Project Performance Evaluation Reports | Oct 2020 |
Kazakhstan: MFF-CAREC Corridor 1 (Zhambyl Oblast Section) Investment Program | Validations of Project Completion Reports | Dec 2018 |
Kazakhstan: CAREC Transport Corridor I (Zhambyl Oblast Section) [Western Europe–Western People's Republic of China International Transit Corridor] Investment Program (Tranche 3) | Validations of Project Completion Reports | Oct 2017 |
Related Publications
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
Tenders
Contracts Awarded
Procurement Plan
Title | Document Type | Document Date |
---|---|---|
CAREC Transport Corridor 1 (Zhambyl Oblast Section) Investment Program - Tranche 3 | Procurement Plans | May 2015 |