Viet Nam : Sustainable Rural Infrastructure Development Project in the Northern Mountain Provinces
Following the successful implementation of the Rural Infrastructure Sector Project (RISP), the Government of Viet Nam (the Government) had received this technical assistance (TA) to prepare an investment project for sustainable rural infrastructure development in the 15 provinces of the northern mountain region. The planned investment project will aim to reduce poverty among severely disadvantaged ethnic minority communities in the target area through providing basic rural infrastructure, for improved access to markets, services, social amenities, and health and education. It is also expected to contribute to increased productivity of agriculture, increased incomes, diversification of employment opportunities through increased private investments in isolated areas, as well as improved school attendance of children, and reduced workloads of women and girls.
Project Details
-
Project Officer
Salter, Charles David
Southeast Asia Department
Request for information -
Country/Economy
Viet Nam -
Modality
-
Sector
- Agriculture, natural resources and rural development
Project Name | Sustainable Rural Infrastructure Development Project in the Northern Mountain Provinces | ||||||||||||
Project Number | 41461-012 | ||||||||||||
Country / Economy | Viet Nam |
||||||||||||
Project Status | Closed | ||||||||||||
Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Technical Assistance |
||||||||||||
Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||||||||||
Strategic Agendas | Inclusive economic growth |
||||||||||||
Drivers of Change | Governance and capacity development Knowledge solutions |
||||||||||||
Sector / Subsector | Agriculture, natural resources and rural development / Agricultural policy, institutional and capacity development |
||||||||||||
Gender | |||||||||||||
Description | Following the successful implementation of the Rural Infrastructure Sector Project (RISP), the Government of Viet Nam (the Government) had received this technical assistance (TA) to prepare an investment project for sustainable rural infrastructure development in the 15 provinces of the northern mountain region. The planned investment project will aim to reduce poverty among severely disadvantaged ethnic minority communities in the target area through providing basic rural infrastructure, for improved access to markets, services, social amenities, and health and education. It is also expected to contribute to increased productivity of agriculture, increased incomes, diversification of employment opportunities through increased private investments in isolated areas, as well as improved school attendance of children, and reduced workloads of women and girls. | ||||||||||||
Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | The Government is keen to address the problems posed by the persistence of poverty and hunger among ethnic minority populations in the northern mountain region. In its Five-Year Socio-Economic Development Plan (SEDP) 2006-2010, the Government enunciated its goals of rapid socioeconomic development for the northern mountain region, with respect to hunger eradication and poverty reduction, and reduced economic disparities across regions and among ethnic groups. For the northern mountain region in particular, the SEDP targets a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of $460-$530 by 2010, as compared to $250-$300 in 2008. The SEDP identifies a clear role for rural transport, water supply and other rural infrastructure in support of various sector objectives, by using the government budgets to focus on critical areas (e.g., irrigation, transport, and clean water supply) as means to agriculture and rural development and fundamental to transformation of production structures. The ADB assisted RISP, which supported rural infrastructure improvements in 23 provinces in the country (including several mountain provinces), demonstrates that improved access to rural infrastructure is an effective means of improving livelihoods and living conditions, and reducing rural poverty. The lessons from the RISP, to those of the World Bank assisted project, highlight the importance of the following: (i) an integrated investment approach to address the development needs of poor communities more effectively; (ii) active beneficiary participation in all aspects of subproject design and implementation; (iii) appropriate technical, institutional, and financial arrangements for each type of infrastructure; (iv) coordination among concerned provincial institutions; (v) compliance with safeguard policies; (vi) an adequate O&M budget; and (vii) the importance of ensuring the availability of productive resources and support services to enable target groups to increase their productivity and utilize rural infrastructure to its full potential. Further, the evaluation of earlier national targeted programs demonstrates the importance of community participation in planning, supervision, and monitoring of rural infrastructure; improving transparency and governance; poverty targeting; and better process monitoring and impact evaluation. As envisaged in the country strategy and program, SEDP, and associated provincial master plans, there is a need to increase agricultural production and enhance the marketability of local produce to reduce poverty in the region. Investments for upgrading rural infrastructure are critical to facilitating equitable socioeconomic development and enhancing the well-being of poor ethnic minorities. In view of these priorities in the northern mountain provinces, the Government has requested ADB to provide technical assistance (TA) to develop an investment project for sustainable rural infrastructure development. The PPTA is included in the Country Program and Strategy ADB's country strategy and program for Viet Nam (2007-2010)which recognizes the increasing complexity of poverty in the northern mountain provinces, as well as the need for promoting national investments to support sub-regional development. |
||||||||||||
Impact | Poverty reduction of ethnic minority populations in target provinces to be achieved through better access to markets, improved access to social services, increased connectivity to sub regional trade centers and improved social and environmental management. |
Project Outcome | |
---|---|
Description of Outcome | Improved livelihoods and human development through access to priority rural infrastructure |
Progress Toward Outcome | |
Implementation Progress | |
Description of Project Outputs | A detailed sector type investment project including the following: a)Sector assessment and lessons learned b)selection criteria for sub projects c)detailed feasibility studies for sample sub projects d)involuntary resettlement framework and plans e)ethnic minority development framework and plans f) gender action plan, poverty analysis g)socio economic impact assessment h)economic and financial analysis i) project management and implementation arrangements |
Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues) | |
Geographical Location |
Safeguard Categories | |
---|---|
Environment | B |
Involuntary Resettlement | B |
Indigenous Peoples | B |
Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
---|---|
Environmental Aspects | |
Involuntary Resettlement | |
Indigenous Peoples | |
Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
During Project Design | tbd |
During Project Implementation | tbd |
Business Opportunities | |
---|---|
Consulting Services | The TA will require a total of 79 person-months (pm) of consulting services including 35 pm of international and 44 pm of national consultants. A Rural Infrastructure Development Economist will lead the consultant team. Expertise required are rural infrastructure engineer, resettlement specialists, ethnic minority development and GAD specialists, CDD specialists will be recruited individually and the rest of the consultant team will be engaged through a firm in accordance with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants and other arrangements satisfactory to ADB for engaging consultants. |
Responsible ADB Officer | Salter, Charles David |
Responsible ADB Department | Southeast Asia Department |
Responsible ADB Division | Environment, Natural Resources & Agriculture Division, SERD |
Executing Agencies |
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development |
Timetable | |
---|---|
Concept Clearance | 13 Jun 2008 |
Fact Finding | 16 Jun 2008 to 24 Jun 2008 |
MRM | - |
Approval | 12 Dec 2008 |
Last Review Mission | - |
PDS Creation Date | 24 Oct 2008 |
Last PDS Update | 10 Nov 2011 |
TA 7215-VIE
Milestones | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
Original | Revised | Actual | |||
12 Dec 2008 | 24 Mar 2009 | 24 Mar 2009 | 30 Sep 2009 | 30 Jun 2012 | 16 Oct 2012 |
Financing Plan/TA Utilization | Cumulative Disbursements | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADB | Cofinancing | Counterpart | Total | Date | Amount | |||
Gov | Beneficiaries | Project Sponsor | Others | |||||
1,300,000.00 | 50,000.00 | 200,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1,550,000.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 1,273,017.41 |
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Title | Document Type | Document Date |
---|---|---|
Preparing the Sustainable Rural Infrastructure Development Project in the Northern Mountain Provinces (Financed by the Japan Special Fund) | Technical Assistance Reports | Dec 2008 |
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
Related Publications
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
Tenders
Contracts Awarded
Procurement Plan
None currently available.