The project aims to (i) recommend suitable policies and investment strategies to distribute the benefits of growth from the mineral and power exports, and (ii) examine the economy wide and distributional implications of the investment in mining and power industries, and a CGE modeling framework covering global, the PRC and the Mongolian economies.
|Project Name||Small-scale Technical Assistance for Developing a Computable General Equilibrium Modeling Framework for Analyzing the Impacts of Power Trading Between|
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Governance and capacity development
|Sector / Subsector||
Energy / Energy sector development and institutional reform
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||No gender elements|
|Description||The project aims to (i) recommend suitable policies and investment strategies to distribute the benefits of growth from the mineral and power exports, and (ii) examine the economy wide and distributional implications of the investment in mining and power industries, and a CGE modeling framework covering global, the PRC and the Mongolian economies.|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||
Regional cooperation and integration is a high priority for Asian Development Bank (ADB), and the strategy for Mongolia includes assistance for stable broad-based economic growth by diversifying the sources and geographical distribution of growth, and stabilizing export earnings. The same thrust on regional integration is underway, for instance, with the construction under the Western Regional Road Corridor Development Project?Phase 1 to increase market integration in western Mongolia and to link road systems in the Russian Federation to those in the People?s Republic of China (PRC). Similar ongoing projects that could have impact on economic integration are in activities like renewable energy, greenhouse gas abatement, and mitigation of air pollution from coal-fired power plants. Meanwhile, as demand for commodities like coal soars, the Government of Mongolia is considering export of energy resources to the PRC to meet its increasing demand that is fueled by rapid economic growth. The mineral resource boom, if effectively managed, could provide Mongolia with an opportunity to address a wide range of the country?s economic problems. In 2006, the mining sector contributed 18% to gross domestic product (GDP) and 76% of the value of export. Exploration activities have identified several new mineral projects, including: Oyu Tolgoi (copper and gold), Tavan Tolgoi (coal), Tsagaan Suvraga (copper and molybdenum), Tumurtei (iron ore), and Ulaan (lead and zinc).
Recently, because of the relatively small size of Mongolian economy, investment for mine development cannot be justified by the domestic demand, nor can Mongolia bear all the demand risk and price volatility of the export market. The development of export-oriented projects is held back because of poor infrastructure (namely, transport, communications and power); and public sector investment is unsustainable because of the extremely low population density (about 0.5 people per square kilometer in southern Mongolia).
The very large mineral and energy markets in the PRC offer a good opportunity to investors to develop the power resources in Mongolia for export. This is reflected in the direct foreign investments and large commercial interest of international mining companies to develop the mines in southern Mongolia. Though the government will benefit from the revenue stream of taxes and royalty, the trade-off would be the transfer of resources because of the foreign ownership of the projects. The estimated cost of some indicative projects are considerably larger than the capacity of the Government of Mongolia, for example, (i) implementation of a clean coal, zero-emission power project to replace the aging combined heat and power plant in Ulaanbataar and export about 2,000 megawatt to the PRC could cost about $15 billion; (ii) the high-grade, copper-gold mine development project with a peak annual capacity of over 200,000 tons per day is estimated to cost $7.3 billion; and (iii) the coal mine project with 30 million tons per annum capacity that is currently under bidding would cost $2 billion. In comparison to the size of these investments, Mongolia with a population of 2.6 million has a GDP of $2.7 billion (2006), which limits its capacity to bear the risk of such commercial investments. In order to understand the value of such investments, it is to be noted that the export revenue would be nearly $2 billion at 2007 average international price of $65 per ton for the smallest of these projects, i.e., the 30 million tons per year coal project.
Mongolia and the PRC have been discussing a proposal to implement a coal mine, power generation and transmission project in southern Mongolia, specifically to export the power to the PRC. It is modeled after the Nam Theun Hydropower Plant in Lao PDR which aims to support a land-locked developing member country (DMC) to generate a secure, long-term flow of revenue to sustain economic development and reduce poverty through regional trading of power. In developing this Regional Power Cooperation Project, there is a need to better understand the impact of such large investments by foreign investors on the domestic economy, and how various beneficiaries would share the benefits under different scenarios. The optimal development path would be to (i) develop the mining resources gradually, (ii) use the tax and royalty revenues to strengthen infrastructure services, (iii) increase the returns and domestic savings that can then be invested to develop future mining projects, and (iv) include higher value addition to obtain higher export revenue.
To examine the sequencing of investments, it is proposed that a Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) modeling framework be developed. The main characteristics of CGE are its endogenous price specification, sectoral consistency, and behavioral specifications for each economic actor included in the model. The model specifications are derived from microeconomics, reflecting its solid theoretical basis. It views the economy as a system of mutually interdependent markets and seeks to analyze the economy from the microeconomics viewpoint of individual markets considered simultaneously. The CGE model is a useful tool to analyze economy-wide effects and distributional implications of a wide range of policy issues and implications. A CGE model for Mongolia would be fairly robust considering the small population and limited number of economic activities. Once developed, the CGE will be a useful tool for examining the impact of large project development, how benefits would flow to the different household categories, and providing the rationale for using public funds and sovereign borrowing to expand infrastructure services and ownership of the companies that result in higher investments.
During exploratory discussions with the Embassy of the PRC in Mongolia, a need was identified for explaining to the civil society and other stakeholders the benefits of integration with the PRC power market. It is expected that the proposed CGE model will provide the analytical basis for such consultation and building consensus on the project concept.
For the specific example, if the design includes clean coal, zero-emission power for export to the PRC, in addition to the benefits to Mongolia, there will be global benefits from the avoided greenhouse gas emissions, and benefits to the PRC on account of enhanced energy security and expanded trade. These can be examined using the modified versions of the available tools, namely the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Model (first developed by the Center for Global Trade Analysis, http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu) and the CGE Model of the PRC with more emphasis on Mongolia and the rest of the world. Therefore, the analysis could be conducted from the overall perspective of the global, the PRC and Mongolian economies.
|Impact||The impact of the TA will be the implementation of mineral and power export projects in Mongolia.|
|Description of Outcome||The outcome will be recommendations for suitable policies and investments strategies to distribute the benefits of export growth.|
|Progress Toward Outcome|
|Description of Project Outputs||Expected outputs are (i) an examination of economy-wide and distributional implications of the investments in mining and power industries, and (ii) CGE modeling framework covering global, the PRC and Mongolian economies.|
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design||Mongolia: Ministry of Fuel and Energy, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Industry and Trade, National Statistical Office of Mongolia. PRC: National Bureau of Statistics China, Embassy of PRC at Mongolia.|
|During Project Implementation|
|Consulting Services||The consultants will be selected and engaged individually, according to the Guidelines on the Use of Consultants by Asian Development Bank and its Borrowers.|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Teruhisa Oi|
|Responsible ADB Department||East Asia Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Energy Division, EARD|
National Statistical Office of Mongolia
The National Statistics Office of Mongol Government Bldg.-3, Baga Toiruu-44 Mongolia
|Concept Clearance||27 Jun 2008|
|Fact Finding||08 Apr 2008 to 10 Apr 2008|
|Approval||16 Oct 2008|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|PDS Creation Date||18 Mar 2008|
|Last PDS Update||05 Jul 2011|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|16 Oct 2008||-||16 Oct 2008||30 Apr 2010||31 Aug 2011||-|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|0.00||150,000.00||20,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||170,000.00||16 Oct 2008||98,000.70|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
|Title||Document Type||Document Date|
|Developing a Computable General Equilibrium Modeling Framework for Analyzing the Impacts of Power Trading Between Mongolia and the People’s Republic of China||TA Completion Reports||Jul 2012|
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
No tenders for this project were found.
No contracts awarded for this project were found
None currently available.