The National Urban Policy (NUP) adopted by the government in 2007 gives priority to: (i) achieving a balanced national urban structure by directing infrastructure development and investment; (ii) improving the quality of urban life by building a clean, safe, and well developed urban environment; and (iii) setting up effective urban management by empowering capable local institutions. The 3-year interim plan (FY2008?FY2010) under the policy looks forward to government investments in urban infrastructure and other services, and to local institutions empowered and strengthened to build a clean, safe, and prosperous urban environment. While productivity in the urban areas is higher and poverty substantially lower, infrastructure development and service delivery have fallen behind in those areas. Public investments have not kept pace with the growth of the urban population, swelled (by more than 5% yearly) by internal conflicts and the dearth of economic and employment opportunities in the countryside.
|Project Name||Integrated Urban Development Project|
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Environmentally sustainable growth
Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Governance and capacity development
|Sector / Subsector||
Water and other urban infrastructure and services / Urban policy, institutional and capacity development - Urban sewerage - Urban water supply
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||Effective gender mainstreaming|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||
The National Urban Policy (NUP) adopted by the government in 2007 gives priority to: (i) achieving a balanced national urban structure by directing infrastructure development and investment; (ii) improving the quality of urban life by building a clean, safe, and well developed urban environment; and (iii) setting up effective urban management by empowering capable local institutions. The 3-year interim plan (FY2008?FY2010) under the policy looks forward to government investments in urban infrastructure and other services, and to local institutions empowered and strengthened to build a clean, safe, and prosperous urban environment. While productivity in the urban areas is higher and poverty substantially lower, infrastructure development and service delivery have fallen behind in those areas. Public investments have not kept pace with the growth of the urban population, swelled (by more than 5% yearly) by internal conflicts and the dearth of economic and employment opportunities in the countryside. Urban environmental conditions, already deteriorating, have worsened: inaccessible and poor quality drinking water and sanitation facilities, uncollected or improperly dumped waste, water pollution from untreated domestic and industrial wastewater, and waterlogging. Moreover, urban services outside the Kathmandu valley are scarce. As a result, premature death, disease, and associated economic burdens disproportionately affect the poor and the vulnerable. Poor health saps economic growth by reducing labor productivity and holding back educational attainment.
Further development in the Kathmandu Valley has its physical limits. New urban centers will inevitably emerge. But the environment in the urban centers urgently needs improvement to make up the lag in economic development in towns outside the valley and promote social and economic development. The municipalities of Dharan, Janakpur, Nepalgunj, and Siddharthanagar have been provisionally selected for the project on the basis of (i) economic growth potential, (ii) demand for urban services, and (iii) urban management capacity. Dharan is the second largest municipality in the Eastern Region after Biratnagar and rapidly growing as an urban center with an estimated population of 122,000 in 2008. Janakpur, located on the border and connected via an existing railway network with India, is considered a key regional hub in the Central Region, with an estimated population of 91,000 in 2008. Nepalgunj is also located on the border with India and referred to in the NUP as the potential regional economic center in the Mid-western Region with an estimated population of 65,000 in 2008, largest in the Region. Siddharthanagar, another border town with India, is rapidly growing along with Butwal in the Western Region, and has an estimated population of 64,000 in 2008.
The project is in line with the ADB Nepal country partnership strategy, which rests on four pillars: broad-based and inclusive economic growth, inclusive social development, governance and capacity building, and climate change adaptation and environmental sustainability. ADB has been playing a key role in supporting the government in urban development as the largest development partner in the urban sector. Reflecting lessons from similar projects, the project will (i) focus on a small number of physically integrated components (drainage, sewerage and road improvement, and solid waste management in the same area) to simplify administration and coordination; (ii) be confined to a few larger municipalities with relatively higher technical and financial capacity to implement the project and create visible impact; (iii) fully involve stakeholders in project identification and design from an early stage; and (iv) provide capacity development support before project implementation.
|Description of Outcome||tbd|
|Progress Toward Outcome||Interim report was submitted by the consultants in April 2011. Draft final report will be submitted by the end of June 2011. This will be further discussed with the government and project municipalities to reach an agreement on the project scope.|
|Description of Project Outputs||tbd|
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design||Socioeconomic survey including willingness-to-pay survey was undertaken for water supply subprojects. Focus group discussions and workshops have been held. Representatives of nongovernment organizations and community-based organizations were invited to the workshops. For the GESI capacity development component, consultations at central and municipal levels have been undertaken.|
|During Project Implementation||Stakeholder participation and consultation were continued during project implementation. Consultation, participation and TA implementation have been shared with the Government and development partners.|
The international team leader/sewerage and drainage expert engaged individually was mobilized on 18 January 2011, and the national social development specialist, also engaged individually, was mobilized on 12 January 2011. The contract with an international firm associated with a national firm consisting of 3 international and 9 national experts was signed on 1 February 2011, and the co-team leader/financial management expert/economist and national deputy team leader/drainage and sewerage engineer were mobilized on 15 and 3 February 2011 respectively. The inception report was submitted on 13 February 2011, which was discussed during the TA inception mission fielded from 15 to 21 February 2011. Two more individual consultants related to gender equality and social inclusion (GESI) issues, financed by another TA source, were mobilized on 15 March 2011. The interim report was submitted on 15 April 2011, which was the basis of discussions during the Mission.
Consultants will be recruited in line with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2010, as amended from time to time). The TA will require 47.5 person-months of consulting services (15 international and 32.5 national). In order to expedite project preparatory work, an international individual consultant (the team leader) and a national social development and gender specialist will be engaged through the individual consultant selection method. A tem of consultants, who will work under the overall guidance of the ADB project officer and the team leader, will be recruited under one package using the quality-and cost-based method of selection with a standard quality-cost ratio of 80:20. A simplified technial proposal will be used for the selection of a firm. A small number of individual consutlants will be additionally engaged to enhance project readiness and expedite project implementation, on an as-needed basis.
|Responsible ADB Officer||Saito, Norio|
|Responsible ADB Department||South Asia Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Urban Development and Water Division, SARD|
Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Transport
|Fact Finding||25 Aug 2010 to 31 Aug 2010|
|Approval||13 Dec 2010|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|PDS Creation Date||08 Sep 2010|
|Last PDS Update||28 Sep 2012|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|13 Dec 2010||03 Jan 2011||03 Jan 2011||31 Mar 2012||30 Sep 2012||-|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|0.00||800,000.00||142,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||942,000.00||13 Dec 2010||655,600.80|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
|Title||Document Type||Document Date|
|Integrated Urban Development Project: Procurement Specialist’s Services Final Report||Consultants' Reports||Sep 2012|
|Preparing the Integrated Urban Development Project: Final Report||Consultants' Reports||Aug 2012|
|Preparing the Integrated Urban Development Project: Final Report||Consultants' Reports||Jul 2012|
|Preparing the Integrated Urban Development: Final Report||Consultants' Reports||May 2012|
|Integrated Urban Development Project||Consultants' Reports||Sep 2011|
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
No tenders for this project were found.
No contracts awarded for this project were found
None currently available.