The TA aims to contribute to the ongoing global effort to increase the effectiveness of development assistance through the five pillars of the Paris Declaration: harmonization, alignment, ownership, management for development results and mutual accountabiltiy.
|Project Name||Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness|
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Governance and capacity development
|Sector / Subsector||
Public sector management - Economic affairs management - Public administration - Public expenditure and fiscal management
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||No gender elements|
|Description||The TA aims to contribute to the ongoing global effort to increase the effectiveness of development assistance through the five pillars of the Paris Declaration: harmonization, alignment, ownership, management for development results and mutual accountabiltiy.|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy|
|Impact||The proposed R PATA will contribute to the ongoing global efforts to increase the effectiveness of development assistance through the five pillars of the Paris Declaration: harmonization, alignment, ownership, management for development results and mutual accountability. DMCs will move towards achieving greater aid effectiveness and development effectiveness and contribute to achievement of MDGs and poverty reduction in the region. The TA will also have potential impact on improved practices on country ownership and conditionality through Cluster C work on conditionality study and documentation of best practices.|
|Description of Outcome||(i) enhanced capacity of DMCs through sharing of experiences on south south cooperation and development effectiveness, and on preparing their own country plans for implementation of the Paris Declaration (ii) enhanced DMC participation and contribution to the aid effectiveness debate, to discussions at the HLF 4 Roundtables and to the HLF 4 process and outcomes document (iii) influencing aid effectiveness and development effectiveness debate at the international level, and agreeing on the way forward (iv) better partnerships and harmonization of efforts on aid effectiveness and development effectiveness at the HLM and the HLF 4 to ensure intended development outcomes at the country level (v) improved donor practices and policies including for new players int he international aid architecture.|
|Progress Toward Outcome|
|Description of Project Outputs||(i) country case studies for the South South Cooperation and Capacity Development High Level Meeting (HLM) in March 2010 (ii) our sub regional workshops and subregional outcome documents providing timely inputs into the preparation, agenda and scope of HLF 4 Roundtables (iii) a single document consolidating all inputs from the sub regional workshops in order to provide a regional perspective and input towards the discussions at HLF 4 (iv) participation of DMCs at the HLM and at the HLF 4 including the Roundtable meetings, the Ministerial level sessions and the Marketplace (v) meeting to share experiences and ideas about the use of MfDR for achieving development outcomes, and identify common issues to be presented at the HLF 4 (vi) best practice document on conditionality (vii) website (viii) newsletter other publication|
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design|
|During Project Implementation|
|Consulting Services||(i) international individual consultant 6 person months expertise on aid effectiveness (conditionality) (ii) international individual consultant 3 person months expertise on economic regional cooperation (south south cooperation) (iii) international individual consultant 6 person months expertise in writing editing (iv) domestic individual consultant 24 person months expertise in coordination of a series of activities related to the HLF 4|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Senapaty, Manju|
|Responsible ADB Department||Strategy and Policy Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||SPBP|
Asian Development Bank
6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines
|Concept Clearance||25 Sep 2009|
|Fact Finding||11 Mar 2010 to 25 Mar 2010|
|Approval||01 Feb 2010|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|Last PDS Update||22 Oct 2009|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|01 Feb 2010||-||01 Feb 2010||31 May 2012||31 May 2015||-|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|1,370,631.00||920,658.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||2,291,289.00||01 Feb 2010||1,576,703.15|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Public Communications Policy (PCP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
|Title||Document Type||Document Date|
|Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness: Technical Assistance Completion Report||TA Completion Reports||Sep 2015|
|Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness||Technical Assistance Reports||Feb 2010|
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Public Communications Policy (PCP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.