Regional : Selected Evaluation Studies for 2010, Phase 2
This TA aims to help ADB continuously improve the development effectiveness of its operations and policies. The key activities include: (i) three special evaluation studies assessing the (a) development impact of private secto operations, (b) ADB's support on promoting good governance in the Pacific developing member countries, (c) ADB's experience in managing for development results; (ii) an impact evaluation of reforming vocational and technical education system; (iii) real-time evaluation on countrcyclical support facility; (iv) one information brief on good practices to be considered for project designs with multi-components, multi-executing agencies, and multi-location projects; and (v) support to Evaluation Cooperation Group.
Project Details
-
Project Officer
Van Rijn, Johannes Jacobus Frederik
Independent Evaluation Department
Request for information -
Country/Economy
Regional -
Modality
-
Sector
- Public sector management
| Project Name | Selected Evaluation Studies for 2010, Phase 2 | ||||
| Project Number | 44412-012 | ||||
| Country / Economy | Regional |
||||
| Project Status | Closed | ||||
| Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Technical Assistance |
||||
| Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||
| Strategic Agendas | Inclusive economic growth |
||||
| Drivers of Change | Private sector development |
||||
| Sector / Subsector |
Education / Technical and vocational education and training Public sector management / Public expenditure and fiscal management |
||||
| Gender | No gender elements | ||||
| Description | This TA aims to help ADB continuously improve the development effectiveness of its operations and policies. The key activities include: (i) three special evaluation studies assessing the (a) development impact of private secto operations, (b) ADB's support on promoting good governance in the Pacific developing member countries, (c) ADB's experience in managing for development results; (ii) an impact evaluation of reforming vocational and technical education system; (iii) real-time evaluation on countrcyclical support facility; (iv) one information brief on good practices to be considered for project designs with multi-components, multi-executing agencies, and multi-location projects; and (v) support to Evaluation Cooperation Group. | ||||
| Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | |||||
| Impact | Improved development effectiveness of ADB operations and policies through learning from evaluation findings | ||||
| Project Outcome | |
|---|---|
| Description of Outcome | Improved (i) formulation and implementation of country and sector strategies, and ADB policies; and (ii) better design and implementation of public and private sector operations based on IED evaluation findings, lessons, and recommendations |
| Progress Toward Outcome | |
| Implementation Progress | |
| Description of Project Outputs | Four impact and special evaluation studies, one real-time evaluation, one evaluation information brief, disemination of knowledge products and publications, and support for regional centers for monitoring and evaluation |
| Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues) | |
| Geographical Location | Regional |
| Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
|---|---|
| Environmental Aspects | |
| Involuntary Resettlement | |
| Indigenous Peoples | |
| Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
| During Project Design | |
| During Project Implementation | |
| Business Opportunities | |
|---|---|
| Consulting Services | Consulting services required for each evaluation study will be engaged on an individual basis with the detailed terms of reference indicated in the evaluation approach paper. |
| Responsible ADB Officer | Van Rijn, Johannes Jacobus Frederik |
| Responsible ADB Department | Independent Evaluation Department |
| Responsible ADB Division | Office of the Director General, IED |
| Executing Agencies |
Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550, Philippines |
| Timetable | |
|---|---|
| Concept Clearance | 13 Oct 2010 |
| Fact Finding | - |
| MRM | - |
| Approval | 13 Dec 2010 |
| Last Review Mission | - |
| PDS Creation Date | 29 Oct 2010 |
| Last PDS Update | 29 Oct 2010 |
TA 7695-REG
| Milestones | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Approval | Signing Date | Effectivity Date | Closing | ||
| Original | Revised | Actual | |||
| 13 Dec 2010 | - | 13 Dec 2010 | 31 Dec 2012 | 31 Dec 2015 | 31 May 2015 |
| Financing Plan/TA Utilization | Cumulative Disbursements | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADB | Cofinancing | Counterpart | Total | Date | Amount | |||
| Gov | Beneficiaries | Project Sponsor | Others | |||||
| 1,102,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1,102,000.00 | 17 Jun 2022 | 904,188.62 |
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
| Title | Document Type | Document Date |
|---|---|---|
| Selected Evaluation Studies for 2010 | Technical Assistance Reports | Dec 2010 |
| Selected Evaluation Studies for 2010, Phase 2: Technical Assistance Completion Report | TA Completion Reports | Sep 2016 |
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
Related Publications
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
Tenders
Contracts Awarded
Procurement Plan
None currently available.