The objective of the CDTA is to strengthen engineering education at the tertiary level. The CDTA will analyze the trend in engineering and technical education, including the number of institutions, disciplines, their enrollment and faculty strength, and overall quality to explore how collaborative research and human resource development can be fostered.
|Project Name||Strengthening Higher Engineering Education|
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Governance and capacity development
Private sector development
|Sector / Subsector||
Education / Tertiary
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||Some gender elements|
|Description||The objective of the CDTA is to strengthen engineering education at the tertiary level. The CDTA will analyze the trend in engineering and technical education, including the number of institutions, disciplines, their enrollment and faculty strength, and overall quality to explore how collaborative research and human resource development can be fostered. The analysis will draw on the various reform initiatives in higher education on the one hand, and build on such initiatives to enhance the responsiveness of the identified engineering education institutions, on the other hand, in three areas: (i) enhancing the employability of graduates; (ii) partnering with industry to promote research and development relevant to emerging market needs; and (iii) establishing backward linkages (support to schools with science, math and information and communication technology as well as training of trainers for technical education and vocational training) and forward linkages (university-industry linkage through research and development).|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||
Nepal is among the least developed countries in the world, ranked at 138 out of 162 countries. It had 25% of its population living below the national poverty line. Agriculture has been the mainstay of the economy, providing a livelihood for 75% of the population and accounting for about 30% of gross domestic product, but the share is decreasing. Underemployment and non-wage employment are prevalent. The challenges to Nepal's growth include its landlocked geographic location, protracted socio-political transition, and susceptibility to natural disaster.
Nonetheless, Nepal has made progress in reducing its poverty, improving access to basic education, health and clean water. The government's strategy envisages tangible improvements in the living standards of the poor, disadvantaged and socially excluded sections of the population through: (i) employment-oriented and broad based high economic growth, (ii) improved governance and service delivery systems, (iii) inclusive social development, (iv) inclusive development and targeted programs, and (v) sustainable peace building. There is emphasis on massive development need for skills development and enhancing the capacity and entrepreneurship of the young population of Nepal. Together with continued emphasis on ensuring quality formal education, Nepal will be able to tap on its demographic dividend that it currently enjoys. This will require transforming the education system to focus on quality, relevance and employability so that the labor market can move up the value chain from the current heavy reliance on low level skills.
Nepal has three distinct advantages: (i) it is located between two economic giants (India and China) whose growth can trigger robust growth in Nepal; (ii) natural resources including hydropower and bio-diversity remain an enormous potential amidst huge needs for power and energy in South Asia; and (iii) tourism remains a major economic force that can fuel investments in infrastructure. In addition, Nepal's economy is highly dependent on remittances (over 20% of gross domestic product) from overseas workers which continue to expand. However, much of this labor force has low level skills resulting in lower income. All these areas can thrive only if commensurate human resource development can be systematically developed, retained and expanded.
The number of students completing and/or passing secondary education exam or 10 years of schooling (School Leaving Certificate/SLC) is rising fast. It increased more than 100% from 113,020 in 2005 to 259,916 in 2009. Higher education has also expanded rapidly, particularly through private sector participation in response to the unmet demand. The total enrollment increased 20 fold from a very low base of 17,000 students in 1970 to 351,900 students enrolled in 2009. This is still less than 8% of the corresponding age cohort. The majority of the students enroll in humanities and social sciences (86%) and only 6.4%% enroll in science and 4% in engineering. Overall, female enrollment is only 30% of the total enrollment and is often biased towards certain fields (e.g., education and nursing). In engineering, female enrollment is only around 15% of the total enrollment. The quality of education in general is considered low at the school level and the highest failures are in three subjects, i.e., English, math and science in SLC examination. As a result, a lower percentage of students are able to enroll in science and engineering courses at the university level.
While university education has expanded rapidly in the past three decades, the expansion has been largely in humanities and social sciences and less in science & technology and engineering fields. Quality is again considered low in general except for some technical institutes such as engineering and medicine. Higher education is facing several constraints: (i) students are unable to get jobs; (ii) it is detached from research and development in emerging areas that could support school education, skills development, and skills needs particularly in infrastructure; (iii) enrollment is imbalanced by field and sex; and (iv) governance in general is weak in many public and private institutions to allow innovation and necessary initiatives to respond to emerging market conditions. Despite these constraints there are some public institutions that have demonstrated good achievements and several other institutions are growing rapidly from private initiatives.
Very limited information exists on graduate employment status. According to the 2008 Labor Force Survey, the unemployment rate in Nepal was 2.1%. However, masked in this statistics is a very high underemployment rate which was estimated at 43%. Of the roughly 400,000 new entrants in the labor market every year, two-thirds go abroad for jobs. Demand for graduates will increase to support infrastructure development (municipal services for rapid urbanization, transport, energy to particularly tap Nepal's hydro potential and large construction works), the tourism sector, and the rapidly expanding education system. Similarly, given that Nepal is located between two of the fastest and largest growing countries in the world, more graduates will seek overseas employment that will continue to trigger expansion of higher education in Nepal.
From recent discussions, experts and policymakers have indicated the need to identify priority areas in higher education that should complement development efforts associated with science and technology and the leadership role that higher education can play in enhancing the capacity and expertise in targeted areas to catalyze development and economic growth. High quality science and technology and technical education at higher education is crucial in supplying qualified workforce to support growing public and private investments in transportation, energy, municipal engineering, and tourism. Better skilled workers will be able to garner better wage from overseas employment. This approach is also intended to address the lopsided growth in higher education to develop a more responsive and balanced system in engineering, science and technology areas, although the initial focus will be mainly on engineering education.
During the interaction with the expert group, there was a strong support for enhancing engineering and technical education. Among others, the expert group identified four areas that require further follow-up and clarity, i.e., (i) seeking national consensus on the prioritizing engineering and technical education for high level of support; (ii) improving governance of higher education institution; (iii) financing options (subsidies, incentives or rewarding for results and excellence); and (iv) viable public-private partnership (PPP) models for innovation, relevance and resource mobilization. The CDTA will assist the stakeholders including the government, higher education institutions, students, parents, industry representatives, and experts to address these four areas.
The CDTA is fully aligned with ADB's Country Partnership Strategy for 2010-2012 and the government's priority given education's strategic importance in reducing poverty and social exclusion, enhancing economic opportunities and contributing to economic growth. ADB has supported the government in strengthen school education by improving quality and reducing disparity as well as in skills development to increase employability. ADB also plans to develop follow-up project in technical and vocational education and training. The CDTA complements well ADB's ongoing and planned investments, especially by aiming at higher education and exploring ways to strengthen backward linkage to secondary school education and skills development.
|Impact||Improved quality of higher engineering education to meet the emerging labor market needs.|
|Description of Outcome||The engineering and technical education system is designed towards greater market responsiveness.|
|Progress Toward Outcome|
|Description of Project Outputs||
1. An implementation plan is formulated for improved access to and quality of the engineering program.
2. A financing program for the expansion and improvement of the engineering education is prepared.
3. Improved capacity of IOE and participating institutions in human resource and financial management, and administration of academic institutions.
4. A study of various academe-industry-private sector partnership arrangements is completed.
5. Effective planning, management and coordination for the ensuing project to be operational.
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design||The TA preparation has benefited from active participation of key government agencies (Ministry of Education, National Planning Commission, Ministry of Finance) and higher education insitutions (Institute of Engineering, Kathmandu University, and Training Institute for Technical Instruction). ADB also engaged a group of 17 experts from higher education to obtain substantive inputs. Development partners in Nepal have been consulted, too.|
|During Project Implementation||The activities of the CDTA will be carried out through a consultative process involving the key stakeholders to ensure that the recommendations are developed based on consensus. The CDTA will conduct surveys, workshops and focus group discussions to incorporate the views from six types of stakeholders: (i) students; (ii) parents; (iii) teachers; (iv) policy makers (both government and education institutions); (v) private sector; and (vi) development partners.|
|Consulting Services||The TA will engage consultants to provide a total of 32 person-months of inputs (12 person-months of international and 20 person-months of national consultants). ADB will engage the consultants through a firm, using a simplified proposal for the quality- and cost-based selection method as well as on an individual basis, in accordance with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2010, as amended from time to time).|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Gi Soon Song|
|Responsible ADB Department||South Asia Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Human and Social Development Division, SARD|
Ministry of Education
|Concept Clearance||19 Nov 2011|
|Approval||13 Dec 2011|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|Last PDS Update||07 Oct 2011|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|13 Dec 2011||01 Feb 2012||01 Feb 2012||31 Dec 2012||30 Sep 2013||-|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|550,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||550,000.00||13 Dec 2011||292,156.83|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
No tenders for this project were found.
No contracts awarded for this project were found
None currently available.