Micronesia, Federated States of : Public Administration Review of the National Government
The impact of the TA will be an overall political and administrative consensus on the need for revising the NPSS, and adoption of the recommended approach. The outcome will be that the Office of the President (OPR) endorses measures to strengthen the national public administration and the National Public Service System for submission to Congress.
Request for information
Micronesia, Federated States of
- Public sector management
|Project Name||Public Administration Review of the National Government|
|Country / Economy||Micronesia, Federated States of
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Governance and capacity development
|Sector / Subsector||
Public sector management / Public administration
|Description||The impact of the TA will be an overall political and administrative consensus on the need for revising the NPSS, and adoption of the recommended approach. The outcome will be that the Office of the President (OPR) endorses measures to strengthen the national public administration and the National Public Service System for submission to Congress.|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||
The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) has long recognized the importance of having a public administration that is responsive, effective, efficient and accountable. The "Development Framework - Looking to the Future", which was presented at the Development Partners Forum in November 2012, reiterates this notion once again. The track-record of past efforts to achieve this objective has, however, been mixed.
In the late 1990s, FSM embarked on a program of public sector reform, with support from the Asian Development Bank (ADB). This initiative emphasized the need to (i) sharply reduce the number of public servants and (ii) shift the balance of economic activity away from the public to the private sector. The reform reduced the number of public servants by 22% and while the size of the civil service has been modestly increasing since, the total number of civil servants is still 16% lower than it was prior to the reform.
At the same time, the Government has noted that the approach taken was not sufficiently balanced, in that it was too one-sidedly focused on incremental, unprioritized expenditure cuts without sufficiently considering the need to link the downsizing to a strategic plan for a future public service, focused on retaining critical numbers of qualified staff. Finally, the employment capacity in the private sector did not grow as expected, and did not absorb the separated civil servants to the extent anticipated.
Restrictions imposed upon the public service in order to reduce wage and salary costs, have impacted adversely on morale of civil servants, and have reduced incentives to perform at high standards. This has induced difficulties to maintain acceptable standards of service delivery and to perform core governmental functions, including planning and budgeting.
It is in this context that the national government has articulated the need to (i) carefully revisit the organizational set-up of its public administration and the management of the National Public Services System; and (ii) develop options to strengthen the institutional and human resource foundations to enable more responsive, efficient and accountable public service.
The proposed technical assistance (TA) is aligned with the Pacific Approach 2010-2014 , which identifies public sector management as a driver of change in the Pacific, and is included in the 2012 TA program in the FSM COBP 2012-2014.
Overall political and administrative consensus on the need for revising the NPSS, and adoption of the recommended approach
|Description of Outcome||
OPR endorses measures to strengthen the national public administration and public service for submission to Congress
|Progress Toward Outcome|
|Description of Project Outputs||
1. Assessment of the rationale for the national government's public administration set-up, and National Public Service System.
2. Options for alternative institutional and organizational arrangements in the national public administration submitted to OPR
3. Options for revisions to the NPSS operational manuals submitted to OPR.
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design|
|During Project Implementation|
|Consulting Services||The TA is expected to be implemented over 12 months, from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013, and will require an estimated 160 person-days of consulting services. Two international consultants will be recruited in accordance with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (April 2010, as amended from time to time).|
|Procurement||The proceeds of the TA will be disbursed in accordance with Technical Assistance Disbursement Handbook (2010 as amended from time to time)|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Usui, Norio|
|Responsible ADB Department||Pacific Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Urban, Social Development & Public Management Division, PARD|
Office of the President
|Approval||18 Dec 2012|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|Last PDS Update||21 Dec 2012|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|18 Dec 2012||-||18 Dec 2012||31 Dec 2013||31 Aug 2014||30 Sep 2014|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|225,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||225,000.00||17 Jun 2022||211,442.12|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
|Title||Document Type||Document Date|
|Public Administration Review of the National Government: Technical Assistance Completion Report||TA Completion Reports||Feb 2015|
|Proposed S-CDTA to Prepare a Public Administration Review of the National Government of the Federated States of Micronesia||Small-scale Technical Assistance Memo||Dec 2012|
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
None currently available.