The SRSIP will provide incentives by way of grant funds to eight focus states, for progressive improvement of effective road safety. A dynamic ranking system, based on monthly and yearly performance, in road safety interventions, will be set in place for the states. The indicators for measuring performance will be at outcome levels for accident fatalities, as well as identified interventions covering institutional, accident risk mitigation, accident response, and awareness. Subject to specified metrics being achieved, MORTH would pass on ADB's financial assistance and funds from its budgetary sources as a grant to the states.
| Project Name | State Road Safety Incentive Program | ||||||||
| Project Number | 53336-001 | ||||||||
| Country | India |
||||||||
| Project Status | Proposed | ||||||||
| Project Type / Modality of Assistance | Loan Technical Assistance |
||||||||
| Source of Funding / Amount |
|
||||||||
| Strategic Agendas | Inclusive economic growth |
||||||||
| Drivers of Change | Gender Equity and Mainstreaming Governance and capacity development Private sector development |
||||||||
| Sector / Subsector | Transport / Road transport (non-urban) |
||||||||
| Gender Equity and Mainstreaming | Effective gender mainstreaming | ||||||||
| Description | The SRSIP will provide incentives by way of grant funds to eight focus states, for progressive improvement of effective road safety. A dynamic ranking system, based on monthly and yearly performance, in road safety interventions, will be set in place for the states. The indicators for measuring performance will be at outcome levels for accident fatalities, as well as identified interventions covering institutional, accident risk mitigation, accident response, and awareness. Subject to specified metrics being achieved, MORTH would pass on ADB's financial assistance and funds from its budgetary sources as a grant to the states. | ||||||||
| Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy | The results-based lending modality (RBL) is the most suitable for SRSIP on account of the following factors: (i) Road safety in India is a difficult area of intervention given the nature of the causes and remedial interventions, multiplicity of agencies involved, and mix of strategy and specific actions. (ii) MORTH has already spent over two years in developing the framework and institutional structure, which demonstrates strong interest and ownership of the government. (iii) While NRSP aims to set up the various central- and state-level institutions and governance mechanisms, further efforts are required for making these operational and effective. (iv) ADB has a large road-sector portfolio in India. However, interventions on road safety are generally through engineering interventions or in ancillary terms, like safety audits. Addressing road safety issues in a systematic and comprehensive way will leverage ADB financing and improve positive impacts of ADB's involvement in India's road sector. (v) SRSIP is a results-based program, incentivizing states to achieve better results in road safety, and offer opportunities for harmonization with other development partners. |
||||||||
| Impact | Road safety in India improved | ||||||||
| Outcome | Fatalities from road accidents in focus states reduced | ||||||||
| Outputs | Institutional monitoring system established Accident risk identification systems established Vehicle fitness checks and accident risk spots rectified Accident response system strengthened Awareness campaigns implemented |
||||||||
| Geographical Location | Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh | ||||||||
| Safeguard Categories | |
|---|---|
| Environment | C |
| Involuntary Resettlement | C |
| Indigenous Peoples | C |
| Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects | |
|---|---|
| Environmental Aspects | The program's environmental and social impact will be assessed, and a safeguard systems assessment report will be prepared as necessary, including the Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) policy principles that will be likely applied to the SRSIP. |
| Involuntary Resettlement | The program is not expected to entail land acquisition due to civil works. Involuntary resettlement impacts and issues will be confirmed during program due diligence and further processing. |
| Indigenous Peoples | The program is not expected to entail impacts on indigenous peoples. The program awareness campaign and information dissemination will be ensured to be accessible to all in terms of language used and distribution of road safety materials. |
| Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation | |
| During Project Design | The general population of the states participating in the program will be the primary beneficiary followed by the commuters and road users, line and state agencies, transport-related institutions, and businesses. Widespread consultations and focus group discussions shall be conducted for the program in all participating states to obtain the views of the community, in particular, women and the vulnerable, about the program and its potential benefits. |
| During Project Implementation | |
| Business Opportunities | |
|---|---|
| Consulting Services | All consultant recruitment will be carried out under ADB's Procurement Policy and Regulations (2017). |
| Procurement | N/A |
| Responsible ADB Officer | Peri, Ravi Venkat |
| Responsible ADB Department | South Asia Department |
| Responsible ADB Division | Transport and Communications Division, SARD |
| Executing Agencies |
Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Transport Bhavan Room 509 |
| Timetable | |
|---|---|
| Concept Clearance | 10 Oct 2019 |
| Fact Finding | 20 Apr 2020 to 28 Apr 2020 |
| MRM | 02 Jul 2020 |
| Approval | - |
| Last Review Mission | - |
| Last PDS Update | 11 Oct 2019 |
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
| Title | Document Type | Document Date |
|---|---|---|
| State Road Safety Incentive Program: Initial Poverty and Social Analysis | Initial Poverty and Social Analysis | Oct 2019 |
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
Related Publications
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
Tenders
No tenders for this project were found.
Contracts Awarded
No contracts awarded for this project were found
Procurement Plan
None currently available.