Regional: Supporting Evaluations for Development Effectiveness in Asia and the Pacific, 2022-2023 (Subproject 2)
The knowledge and support technical assistance cluster (C-KSTA) on Supporting Evaluations in Asia and the Pacific, 2020 2024, consisting of 3 subprojects,_was approved by the Board of Directors of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) on a no-objection basis on 27 August 2020. KSTA 6701 (Subproject 1 of the C-KSTA)_is underway and agreed funding set aside for a regional assistance program evaluation, a corporate evaluation, and two sector-wide evaluations and validations of country partnership strategy final reviews, from its original scope. Subproject 2 will also fund high-level and other evaluations to improve ADB strategies, policies, processes, and operations._In doing so, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) follows internationally accepted principles and standards.
Graham, Benjamin M.
Independent Evaluation Department
Request for information
- Public sector management
|Project Name||Supporting Evaluations for Development Effectiveness in Asia and the Pacific, 2022-2023 (Subproject 2)|
|Country / Economy||Regional
|Project Type / Modality of Assistance||Technical Assistance
|Source of Funding / Amount||
|Strategic Agendas||Environmentally sustainable growth
Inclusive economic growth
|Drivers of Change||Gender Equity and Mainstreaming
Governance and capacity development
Private sector development
|Sector / Subsector||
Agriculture, natural resources and rural development / Agricultural policy, institutional and capacity development
Education / Education sector development - social protection initiatives
Energy / Energy efficiency and conservation - Energy sector development and institutional reform
Finance / Finance sector development - Small and medium enterprise finance and leasing
Health / Health sector development and reform
Industry and trade / Trade and services
Information and communication technology / ICT strategy and policy, and capacity development
Public sector management / Public administration - Public expenditure and fiscal management
Transport / Multimodal logistics - Road transport (non-urban) - Transport policies and institutional development - Urban roads and traffic management
Water and other urban infrastructure and services / Urban policy, institutional and capacity development - Urban sanitation - Urban water supply
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming||Some gender elements|
|Description||The knowledge and support technical assistance cluster (C-KSTA) on Supporting Evaluations in Asia and the Pacific, 2020 2024, consisting of 3 subprojects,_was approved by the Board of Directors of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) on a no-objection basis on 27 August 2020. KSTA 6701 (Subproject 1 of the C-KSTA)_is underway and agreed funding set aside for a regional assistance program evaluation, a corporate evaluation, and two sector-wide evaluations and validations of country partnership strategy final reviews, from its original scope. Subproject 2 will also fund high-level and other evaluations to improve ADB strategies, policies, processes, and operations._In doing so, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) follows internationally accepted principles and standards.|
|Project Rationale and Linkage to Country/Regional Strategy||Subproject 2 is_aligned with the C-KSTA's impact of improved development effectiveness of ADB operations, policies, and business processes._ Its intended outcome is the increased use of and learning from evaluations and their recommendations by the Development Effectiveness Committee (DEC), ADB Management and staff, and broader stakeholders. The implicit theory of change holds that under the 2022-2024 work program, IED will deliver a combination of evaluations that are strategically and operationally relevant to Strategy 2030. These, along with their knowledge sharing and outreach, will in turn support more effective ADB policies, processes, and operationssubsequently benefiting developing member countries (DMCs) in Asia and the Pacific.|
Development effectiveness of ADB operations, policies, and business processes improved
|Description of Outcome||
Use of and learning from evaluations and their recommendations by the Board, Development Effectiveness Committee, ADB Management and Staff, and broader stakeholders increased
|Progress Toward Outcome|
|Description of Project Outputs||
Corporate and Thematic Evaluations (a strategic mix of high-quality corporate and thematic evaluations with direct relevance to Strategy 2030 delivered, with evaluation knowledge management engagement and support.)
Country and regional program Evaluations and Validations (country and sub-regional evaluations delivered and feeding directly into ADB country partnership strategy planning and Board approval cycles, with evaluation knowledge management engagement and support.)
Sector Evaluations (sector-assistance program evaluations, sector-wide evaluations, and sector synthesis notes delivered and informing ADB sector plans and operations, with evaluation knowledge management engagement and support.)
Complementary, quick turn-around and other evaluation work (systematic reviews, topical papers, synthesis notes and other evaluation work and research delivered, with evaluation knowledge management engagement and support.)
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)|
|Summary of Environmental and Social Aspects|
|Stakeholder Communication, Participation, and Consultation|
|During Project Design||During the inception stage of evaluations, the evaluation team consults with ADB Management and relevant staff (including resident missions) and, where appropriate, various institutions in government and civil society, including development partners and nongovernment organizations. It will coordinate with relevant government agencies and obtain on a no objection from the government before starting any activity under this subproject in the territory of that country.|
|During Project Implementation||IED will look for innovative approaches in preparing independent evaluations that add value for its clients, i.e.,_approaches, designs, components, features (e.g., development or application of advanced technology), preparation, or implementation processes that are new to its targeted stakeholders.|
The Subproject will fund the engagement of (i) sector and thematic specialists and researchers to help conduct in-depth analysis and/or give expert inputs on the development context and challenges during report preparation, i.e., data collection, surveys and processing, quantitative and qualitative analyses, background analytical papers, and main report preparation; (ii) external experts for independent peer reviews; and (iii) resource persons and/or coordinators to help organize outreach and knowledge-sharing activities. Full details of consulting services and terms of reference (i.e., positions, expertise, duration, terms of reference and deliverables, and cost estimates) will be developed at the inception phase of the evaluation or activity using a consultant recruitment note (if needed) and the requisite evaluation approach paper (EAP) and validation plan.
International and/or national consultants (either on an individual or resource person arrangement) will be engaged in accordance with the ADB Procurement Policy and associated Project Administration Instructions and/or TA Staff Instructions. Details of consulting services and terms of reference will be firmed up at the inception stage of an evaluation or activity. Subproject activities will tentatively require 22 international consultants for 49 person-months; 33 in-country national consultants for 32 person-months; 17 ADB Headquarters-based consultants for 63 person-months; and 13 international consultants cum resource persons for 5 person-months. The use of a consulting firm will be considered at the inception phase of an evaluation especially those which involve major survey, broad and complex quantitative analyses.
|Procurement||Implementation arrangements for_procurement will be finalized prior to approval of the evaluation approach paper._The purchase of evaluation tools, supplies and services will be for core evaluation and dissemination work such as conducting conferences, seminars, and/or workshops; and surveys._These will range from programming and database tools to analytical instruments, and services as inputs during report preparation and supplies and services for seminars, workshops, and surveys. Any purchase of goods or services will be in accordance with ADB Procurement Policy (2017, as amended from time to tie) and the Procurement Regulations for ADB Borrowers (2017, as amended from time to time) and the associated project administration instructions and/or staff instructions.|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Graham, Benjamin M.|
|Responsible ADB Department||Independent Evaluation Department|
|Responsible ADB Division||Office of the Director General, IED|
Asian Development Bank
|Approval||23 Dec 2021|
|Last Review Mission||-|
|Last PDS Update||27 Dec 2021|
|Approval||Signing Date||Effectivity Date||Closing|
|23 Dec 2021||-||23 Dec 2021||31 Dec 2024||-||-|
|Financing Plan/TA Utilization||Cumulative Disbursements|
|2,150,000.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||0.00||2,150,000.00||16 Nov 2022||8,789.43|
Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program. Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) recognizes that transparency and accountability are essential to development effectiveness. It establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced.
The Accountability Mechanism provides a forum where people adversely affected by ADB-assisted projects can voice and seek solutions to their problems and report alleged noncompliance of ADB's operational policies and procedures.
In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
|Title||Document Type||Document Date|
|Supporting Evaluations for Development Effectiveness in Asia and the Pacific, 2022−2023 (Subproject 2): Technical Assistance Subproject Report||TA Subproject Proposal||Dec 2021|
Safeguard Documents See also: Safeguards
Safeguard documents provided at the time of project/facility approval may also be found in the list of linked documents provided with the Report and Recommendation of the President.
None currently available.
Evaluation Documents See also: Independent Evaluation
None currently available.
None currently available.
The Access to Information Policy (AIP) establishes the disclosure requirements for documents and information ADB produces or requires to be produced in its operations to facilitate stakeholder participation in ADB's decision-making. For more information, refer to the Safeguard Policy Statement, Operations Manual F1, and Operations Manual L3.
Requests for information may also be directed to the InfoUnit.
|Tender Title||Type||Status||Posting Date||Deadline|
|Supporting Evaluations for Development Effectiveness in Asia and the Pacific, 2022−2023 (Subproject 2): Policy and Development Results Advisor/Lead Consultant (Evaluation of ADF 12 and 13)||Individual - Consulting||Closed||12 Oct 2022||18 Oct 2022|
|Supporting Evaluations for Development Effectiveness in Asia and the Pacific, 2022−2023 (Subproject 2) - PVR Analyst/Coordinator||Individual - Consulting||Closed||06 Aug 2022||12 Aug 2022|
No contracts awarded for this project were found
None currently available.